The Pros And Cons Of Cheating

These same devices that can enhance our learning can also backfire and detract from it. The same technology that allows teachers some benefit, professors also find a nuisance. The mobile phones that have basically become mobile computers are considered a major distraction because of the silent ringers, e-mails, and instant messages that interrupt us constantly while we are in class. Distraction is not the only worry to the teachers in classrooms worldwide; technology has also made cheating more easily. Stephanie Dunnewind states her point of view in Internet Creates New Opportunities for Cheating, but Also Learning that “More than three-quarters of public school students admitted to cheating on an exam in the past year, either by copying, using crib notes or helping another student. Some students justify dishonesty as a fairness issue”(113). The problem with students multi-tasking is that it takes awhile for our brains to get back into focus of what we were doing prior to the intrusion. Intrusions during class result in the students finding trouble with participating in the lesson getting their class work done. The technologies of the

The article, “Academic Cheating on the Rise”, by Amanda Oglesby discusses how technology has become a major contributer to the cheating scandal. Oglesby writes, “Companies such as Spycheatstuff.com will mail overnight a kit with tiny wireless earbuds to allow a test-taker to discreetly “phone a friend” during a test. Others offer to write acdemic essays for a fee, and students are using built-in thesaurus software on word-processing programs to try to cover plagiarized paragraphs” (Oglesby). While proctors, teachers and administrators find ways to ensure academic integrity, students have found clever technology to allow them to cheat on the test without getting caught. The creators of this easy-to-cheat technology have accepted the idea of students cheating and now see it as a new market and buisness

this incoming technology is not only a distraction for the students, but for the teachers as well.

ABC NEWS, the author of A Cheating Crisis In America's Schools, states "technology is giving students even more ways to cheat nowadays" Technology, is very useful to learn, but students are using it to find better ways to cheat (ABC NEWS). I believe cheating is practice in all school levels. Therefore , when student go to college, they think it would be easier to cheat instead of studying.

Technology allows information to be readily available for students whenever they need it. With all this information effortlessly obtainable, students can take the shortcut and look up the answers, which can be viewed as cheating. Not having to work for answers could lead students to forget the “old ways” of studying; having to actually think and read could become a thing of the past. Shawn, a 26 year old teacher, had a slow class and many students were giving vague answers to his reading assignment. He “found out that only a handful of students had read the chapter while the others had either read the cliffnotes or found a summary online.”, most of the students in his class were determined to go to great universities (Rosen 23). This is proof

Remember that scary, grotesque, evil monster we were all scared of when we were younger? Well, it's alive, we just can't see it, and it's called technology. As we all know, technology is changing and evolving every day; but it's almost as if the technology is taking over the minds of our future generation. Schools are incorporating technology into learning more and more all the time. Every month there is a new phone, tablet, television, laptop and even thousands of websites. These devices can come in handy and can be helpful, but they almost are consuming everyone's mind and minimizing critical thinking. Many of technology users are children or young adults. Although the use of technology in education can have some positive results, it has more negative effects that are affecting students.

Student Ethics in the Digital Age Final Draft In America, college and high school students have consistently participated in academic dishonesty. Students are driven to cheat because they feel pressured to be the best at school and recently technology has made it effortless for the students to be dishonest. Students should not cheat in school, because it can affect the moral standards of a person, such as their sense of right and wrong in the world outside of school. Many people believe that students engage in cheating only because they are dishonest, but that is not always the case.

Electronics are believed to interfere with learning. Jose Antonio Bowen states in his article, “NO: Classrooms Must Be a Place of Focus and Mental Stillness,” that instead of improving education, technology “doesn’t solve the problem, it only brings it into the classroom.” However, these problems could be prevented if students were given restrictions while still having the ability to find different and unique ways to boost their knowledge. In “YES: New Tools Let Students Learn More, and More Deeply,” Lisa Nielsen explains that just because they have access to electronic devices does not necessarily mean that they are doing something other than texting or cheating, and that teachers are monitoring their students at the best of their ability.

Studies have shown that over fifty percent of students have cheated once in there life. Since one person copies off someone else it makes it easier for other people to consider the idea of answering dishonestly. Technology has made cheating much more easier. It takes only one picture for an image of the homework from last night to go around the whole

Would you believe that 80 to 95 percent of high school students admit to cheating at least one time in the past year? (2nd source). Students use many tactics for cheating because they do not understand the subject, or they stress the need to be successful. I believe, because of transformation of cheating and lack of disciplinary consequences, cheating has become more prevalent in schools in our society.

Schools are recognizing this advancement in technology, and are trying to accomplish involvement to help students elaborate on their school work. The unfortunate side to this remarkable advancement in technology, it is giving an easier and more appealing way to cheat. Students have found creative ways to cheat including color coding with candy, pictures sent from cellular devices, and Pictures saved to a student's wallpaper on their cell phone. “Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—I took the one less traveled by, And that has made all the difference.” -Robert Frost. A student who decides to take the “easy road” never recognizes their true potential. Their academic Achievements mean nothing,and they have to depend on other people and outside sources. For the student who studies every night works hard in and out of the classroom will receive the same job opportunities. Two of which have the same qualification and connections one will have earned it more. Fairness and equality will not be existent in the problem. The student that worked hard through school just to have been cheated off of will receive the same diploma. Today earning a diploma is just a piece of paper. The academic process is being made a mockery of the people who are not willing to put in the time or the effort into their school

The final result of using digital devices during school hours is not a good one. Students can cheat more easily, which means that they are not preparing for the future and society.

Technology ought not to be utilized as an approach to keep students possessed. A little number of computers or gadgets in a classroom can be a welcoming focus, whether it is a relegated or a picked toward oneself one. In the event that you utilize technology as a part of thusly, pick astutely when you choose what the students will do with the technology. There are a lot of people, numerous inventive choices accessible. It ought not to be just to keep students occupied while you work with little gatherings of

Technology is rapidly evolving and changing, and as a result of the increasing availability and propagation of several forms of technology, academic dishonesty cases in every college and university have greatly multiplied and become a global issue. The issue on cheating behaviors in students is so pervasive and uncontrollable that it is almost considered as commonplace (Arhin & Jones, 2009). One of the hardest challenges for educators is knowing how and when to discipline their students. In the given scenario, there are several issues to take into account; the first and foremost being the issue of academic dishonesty. Academic dishonesty is defined by the Webster dictionary as the intentional participation in deceptive practices regarding one’s academic work or the work of another (Faucher & Caves, 2009). Jones (2011) states that many institutions of higher education have adopted academic dishonesty policies, instituted academic integrity tutorial completion prerequisites for next term registration, and acquired plagiarism software detection tools. They go on to say that within the past few years, high-tech cheating is gradually replacing the simple cut-and-paste cheating, and educators must be proactive and develop instructional strategies that integrate all facets of appropriate digital citizenship, that is, digital ethics. By implementing these academic dishonesty and integrity policies and making them attainable to

Many people tend to equate ethics with their feelings. But being ethical is clearly not a matter of followings one’s feelings. Ethics, however, cannot be confined to religion nor is it the same as religion. Being ethical is not the same as following the law. The law often incorporates ethical standards to which most citizens subscribe. But laws, like feelings, can deviate from what is ethical. Finally, being ethical is not the same as doing “whatever society accepts.” In any society, most people accept standards that are ethical. But standards of behaviour in society can deviate from what is ethical. An entire society can become ethically corrupt. Nazi Germany is good example of a morally corrupt society. What then, is