The Pros And Cons Of Civil Protests

The  Civil Rights Movement is a substantial example of civil disobedience for the reason that  they were peacefully protesting while accepting their consequences.  On the other hand, people today believe that they're protesting peacefully however, peace can lead to violence and take away the credibility of their cause. Causing destruction in their community, where civil disobedience impacts society negatively because the situations get out of hand that cause chaotic cases which involves brutality.

One example of the success of peaceful protest is Brown vs. Board of Education. In the case Plessy vs. Ferguson, the Supreme Court ruled that the issue of segregation in schools did not violate the constitution, that it was “separate but equal” . The reality of segregated schools is not equal it segregated children with a different color skin from white children, and deprived them of a proper education. Brown vs. Board of Education was a very important United States Supreme Court case it stated that the state laws that made segregation legal were said to be unconstitutional. Through time and togetherness the people of topeka chose to peacefully address the issue

Similar to protests, rebellions evoke change in the system through peace. If words are not enough, often times citizens take matters into their own hands. The Montgomery Bus Boycott and the 1963 March on Washington are both famous examples. Without violence, the famous bus boycott drew the attention of the Supreme Court. In 1956, the Supreme Court ruled that the laws segregating African Americans on Montgomery buses were unconstitutional; consequently, this was a large victory for the African Americans, and propelled their case for equal rights. In 1963, the world was no so peaceful for African Americans. Violent attacks on peaceful demonstrators were consuming the deep south, and this called for a mass protest march into Washington D.C. This peaceful demonstration drew the attention of John F. Kennedy, and provoked him to pass a federal civil rights bill later that year. The success of peaceful rebellions is explicitly shown through these two examples, which both brought on major changes. Civil disobedience is like a construction site. It is long and occasionally messy, but the outcome that results is without a doubt worth the initial troubles. The refusal to comply with unjust laws is what drives the United

How does the social responsibility of intellectuals to demonstrate civil disobedience differ from Lincoln and MLK’s time and today as demonstrated by Black lives matter and Antifa

Ever since the American Revolution Americans have resisted against laws that they view as unfair. The resistance of laws can either be done peacefully like the Civil Rights Movement or violently like the American Revolution. Peaceful resistance has a positive impact on the free society because it has the ability to get to congress and have laws changed to make them fair for everyone. The Civil Rights Movement peacefully resisted segregation laws and was able to change those laws and lead towards integration.

Peaceful resistance to laws has a positive impact on society. Because it's not harming anybody and they're standing up for what they believe in and they have equal rights to every one else. One example was Rosa Parks. At the time, blacks had to go to the back of the bus and one day she decided she was going to stay in the front of the bus because she was tired. She was also making a statement that people should be able to sit wherever they choose to.

Peaceful resistance proved that Black Americans could rebel against the government without using violence.Though not everyone agreed with these principles, it helped kick start the civil rights movement showing that African Americans were not going to let racist remarks tear them down. Our national government needs to focus on peaceful protest, instead of using media to only focus on violence. There is continuing problems with racism in the United States, and a peaceful resistance benefits the cause to rebel. Using voices instead of fits to resist the flaws in the government is the basis of

Peaceful resistance is positive in the way that it draws attention to an issue in society. This point is important because when we live in a country where individuals come from all different ethnic, racial and monetary differences. It is important because these vast differences tend to blind us to the problems of others with different backgrounds than us. This is most evident in the racial issues that still exist within today's society. It is hard being a white middle class teen to see the mistreatment that is still occurring today to my African American peers that has had a lot of attention drawn to it recently. Had the peaceful protests done

America is a country that has been ominous as nation that was openly discriminating against the African-American community. The subject on what is deemed right or just was a controversial topic throughout history, mostly in regards to the black community. Peaceful protesting pertains to the setup of a just law and the emphasis in Martin Luther King Jr, Henry David Thoreau, and Ralph Waldo Emerson opinions has shown that nonviolent protest is moral and highly effective.

The United States of America was founded with the remarkable purpose of unifying a multitude of states-homes to citizens all of cultures and beliefs-whom shared a similar goal of creating a life of freedom and prosperity. In order to secure structure and solidity within an entire nation, it has always been extremely vital to maintain a regulatory government with a strong constitution to represent its citizens as a whole. However, the government can often represent the character of the American man in a way which misinterprets his very intentions. When morals and ethics are found to be void within our governmental institution, and it then becomes a “corporation without conscious”, civil disobedience can be the vital key in awakening human emotions

Civil disobedience and peaceful resistance to laws have instigated within our country, in so many instances, much-needed change. The Boston Tea Party, the Suffragettes, Rosa Parks, Martin Luther King Jr. and the Civil Rights movement are only a few examples of times that civil disobedience has redefined our country. Without peaceful resistance to laws on moral or political grounds, the citizens of the United States would not have many of the freedoms we value.

People of color would go into restaurants the laws prohibited them from going in and sat down, to protest that there should be no segregation. While breaking these laws they put themselves in danger and the ones around them in danger. In the end the peaceful resistance to the segregation laws did in turn accomplish the change in laws and created three new amendments, Although they did put many people in danger including themselves because of their actions. I do believe that “We the People of The United States” (United States Constitution preamble) have a say in what our government does and we do have the right to overrule the government if its power becomes too great. I also believe we should do so in an order that obtains the laws, because they are put into place for a reason even if that reason is hard to understand. My opinion would be that although peaceful resistance has been positive in history it has also been negative, and within a free society there are many ways of changing a law without breaking any. American citizens are educated on ways to change laws and they should go about doing so legally without breaking any

Peacefully protesting to show support of a cause is not harmful to society. In the past, it has been a technique simply to show you feel that your situation, a law or a proposition is not justified, in your eyes. Protesting in that way does not damage society, however protests too often escalate to anger and violence, diminishing the validity of the cause being demonstrated.

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. Rather than having violent movements and harming citizens, it is better to peacefully resist. Once a violence is used, the resistance to the law becomes nulled. People tend to not follow a violence protester. Once a violent riot starts, chaos is everywhere. People forget what they are truly fighting for. They unconsciously run away with the fear of getting harmed and dare not to go back. A peaceful resistance on the other hand leads citizens to join and support. People are able to see what they are fighting for and their real intentions. They are able to stand and cause no problem to people passing by as they are showing their support through silent voices. Many famous activists and leaders are for nonviolence. Mahatma Gandhi, a primary leader of India’s independence

In conclusion, people believe that violent protest are more effective. That believe that, despite the destruction of personal property and harm that is inflicted on other people, violence solves all problems