The Pros And Cons Of College Education

There are many choices and paths to choose when the time comes to attend college however, a question to ask is, is it worth it? If decided to attend college, the following decision to be made revolves around an area of study one would like to pursue and the topic of study that will be available for them. Though many can further their education in different ways, a couple of ways consist of attending a four year college (private/ public) or a community college. Not going to college at all is the other alternative, but is it really a smart idea? Most adults have continuously told young students all through high school to attend college. A student’s chance of economic success in the future can be risen due to a college education. Judith Scott-Clayton, who is an assistant professor of economics and education at Teachers College at Columbia University states, “Individuals with bachelor’s degrees earn about 60 percent more than those with just a high school diploma, who in turn earn about 40 percent more than high school dropouts.” Students who seek higher education, are more likely to experience a better future and a better life. The cost of going to college may seem overwhelming at times however, the experiences and education obtained throughout college is priceless in regards to the way one interacts with others on a global basis, has a stronger job stability, and has better employment benefits.

It’s an idea that pops up every now and then. Every year many young people work hard to pass their school-leaving exams and enter a college. However, for many of them acquiring good marks is not the only worry. Unlike the lucky minority from wealthy families, they must also think about the ways of getting money to pay for their education. For a half century, federal funding has flowed to students in the form of vouchers, and students have had the power to choose from an array of providers--public, private, and for-profit. Making education free can stretch from an array of getting rid of student debts/loans to decreasing the amount of unqualified jobs with the help of President Obama 's idea of making community colleges "free." The government claims that free education is impossible, as there is no possibility to subsidize the universities and colleges with the budget funds. Moreover, when education is fully supported financially by the state, colleges lose their independence and the spirit of democracy and freedom. .

With the shockingly high number of student debt in America, it is no wonder why people constantly look for alternatives to make education cheaper.Certainly, higher education is in need of reformation. However, it should not come at the expense of dollars from people who pay taxes. In theory, free college sounds fantastic, but it must be understood that this luxury is not free. The money would come from people who pay taxes, which is evidently twisted as a majority of people do not value higher education. They should not be forced to pay for something that is optional in one’s life. People will be paying for free college for the rest of their lives in taxes. Moreover, free college removes the incentive of valuing education in high school. There

Why do we work hard in school and attempt to get good grades? Why do we believe that you have to do an outstanding job in high school? The answer is because the majority of us want to go to college and hopefully pursue a career that we'd enjoy. So, why is it that just 65% of us obtain a college degree. The main factor is that college costs are soaring. According to reports the cost of a college degree has increased by 1,120 percent in just 30 years. Consequently, this has lead to difficulties for families to pay for the immense cost of college. Therefore, the government should invest more money to make college education free because students leave school with an unreasonable amount of debt. It also leads to a more prosperous country, and

George Leef discusses several important points in his article “You Will Pay for “Free” College” (n.pag.). Leef first explains that college will never be completely free (n.pag.). In order to have one thing we must give up another and there is no way around that (Leef n.pag.). Leef clarifies with his readers that all the government can do about college tuition is transition the cost from students to taxpayers (n.pag.). George continues his argument with his point that free college tuition will influence colleges in a negative way (n.pag.). A move from students to taxpayers will not only result

A college education has become a necessity in today’s civilization. Students all over the country are concentrating on their academics and are attempting to receive perfect grades. Many students struggle with tuition fees and are forced to find financial aid. Think of it this way, what if you were working hard to support you and your family and you had to pay for your education, would you want to do it? If student’s pay for their own education then they have to put more efforts in doing job to pay their tuitions. By this their grades are getting lower and lower as time passes during their education. Thus, many students, teachers, and people wonder if free college tuition should be granted. A four-year degree has basically replaced the high school diploma as the necessary preparation for a career in this modern economy. Currently most noteworthy discussion is going on through our president Barack Obama to make first two year of college tuitions free.

The costs of a decent college education have risen significantly over the past 50 years and continue to climb at a rate that stands a threat to the future of college education. The most recent presidential election brought about a new round of discussion over the possibility of free state college tuition. President Barack Obama first mentioned the idea in 2015 and conflicting opinions have arisen surrounding the topic ever since. Many people think that free state college education would enable more Americans to receive and then use an education at a higher level than in years past. Others argue that there would be more disadvantages to free state college education and this would far outweigh the possible benefits. Providing free state college education to all citizens would not only lend to increasing the enormous debt of our nation but would potentially offer financial assistance to families without real need and would contribute to the lack of motivation and responsibility of future of the United States of America.

If someone were to ask me if I wanted to go to college for free, I wouldn’t even think twice about my answer. In 2013, seven out of ten graduating seniors had student loans for non-profit colleges. An average of $28,400 for each graduate to have to worry about while trying to find a job (Thompson). Imagine if that number could be cut in half. President, Barack Obama, introduced a proposal to allow the first two years of college to be free for students who attend community college. Of course, the program will have requirements for students who want to waive the tuition costs such as maintaining a 2.5 GPA, make steady progress towards completion, and be enrolled at least half-time. Also for his plan to work, states must supply ¼ of the necessary funds as well (Dash). The project is predicted to cost about sixty billion dollars throughout the next ten years. The White House claims that the program could help nine million students a year. Whether the student is trying to transfer to a four year school or is a mom who wants a degree, the program has the potential to help anyone who meets the requirements.

College education will no longer be an issue for students, so I disagree with this statement, “The value of college education cannot be reduced to a simple economic number.” The topic on every college student’s mind is: college tuition. Since the cost of college is so far-fetched, students are leaving college with high amounts of debt. However, some students can’t even afford college.There are many ways that can reduce the simple cost of college education such as which college was attended, applying for scholarships or grants, and their FAFSA. Students who want to go to college should be able to attend college with a simple economic number.

Our country doesn’t provide free higher education for our society. The majority of people agree that due to high cost of tuition the large amount of people can’t afford higher education at all. Our society facing the biggest challenge today is drowning in student depts. Today, a few people still debate about the importance of free college education. In the article, “What’s Wrong with Guaranteeing a Free College Education?” Stephen Krason argues that “federally guarantee free college tuition holds every promise of not only being an albatross for taxpayers and an incredible economic drain but making worse in multiple ways the whole struggling enterprise of American higher education.” (398) I strongly

Many People only see the negatives in going to college, but the positives highly outweigh the negatives. This is due to the many benefits that college provides, such as getting paid more, and with teaching valuable life skills.

With an explanantion on why college shouldn’t just be free overall consists of the idea that everyone would take advantage of the situation but likewise; the entitlements of the job or degree you’re studying would mean much less. (Pullman, Joy). With costs being cut means it would lead to more college educations, instead of the “463,000 fewer people enrolled in college” (Pathe, Simone). Continuing in the downward spiral, in 2013 the two year spiral was “930,000 fewer college students” (Pathe, Simone). With this drop in students, it should be no question that they need to make college more

“Making college free for everyone would almost certainly mean giving far more money to students from richer families than from poorer ones” (Bruenig 113). The attendance rates of children from wealthy backgrounds exceed those from families who are poor. A student that comes from a wealthy family is more likely to go to college directly after high school as opposed to a student from a poor family (Bruenig 113). Families who have greater wealth are less likely to require financial assistance. Those students coming from poorer families that do not get the opportunity to attend college most often attend community colleges versus four-year institutions because they are cheaper (Bruenig 113). Given that two years of education would be free, children’s families who do not have a stable income are more likely to stop there with their degrees. Only a handful of these students have the support of their families and the assistance through counselors to succeed in college (qtd. in Nguyen and Serna 127). Those from wealthy backgrounds would find it even easier to climb the financial success ladder by utilizing the possible four years. Once again placing them in a higher income bracket in society. When you consider the national debt in today’s society, the thought of free college tuition seems unrealistic (Knoblach 14). If getting a degree did not cost a thing, more

On January 20th, 2015 former President of the United States Barrack Obama, in his State of the Union address spoke on behalf of our education system. With the Barrack and Michelle Obama’s background in education, the controversial topic was raised about the possibility of making college, specifically junior college free for college students. The article written on the State of the Union address by pbs.org states that Obama’s plan for a free junior college education system would provide tuition-free classes for students going to school at least half time who maintain a GPA of 2.5 or higher and are making steady progress toward a degree or transferring to a four-year institution. In this paper, the discussion that is going to take place is tuition

Free tuition is problematic in that it may cause students who are not necessarily suited for college to feel obligated to enroll. If college becomes the new “bare minimum” level of education, young people may feel compelled to attend, even if it is not the correct choice for their personal and professional goals. This could cause dropout rates to increase, leaving students in a worse position than if they had entered the workforce directly after high