The Pros And Cons Of College Sports

Although college football is the third-most-popular sport, the majority of schools lose revenue on athletics. The National Collegiate Athletic Association, also known as the NCAA, is promoting beneficial ideas to help players in need while increasing academic standards. As stated in the article, “On some LSU teams, Martin said, half of the players are “special admits””, which means multitudes of players do not achieve the same levels of academic success as “normal” students. As long as academic budgets are miniscule compared to athletic budgets, there will always be controversy. This tension increased when “legendary head coach” Joe Paterno, along with Jerry Sandusky, were fired for being involved in a sex-abuse scandal with a minor.

The NCAA recognizes one of its core values as “the pursuit of excellence in both academics and athletics” (NCAA Core Values). This shows that the NCAA is looking to benefit the students at all costs. They want to include the coaching staff of universities in this core value, but much confusion has been found between the NCAA and university athletic staff. This confusion has resulted in a tension and conflict leading to a discussion on the steps of resolution that can be taken to put this core value back into sights for both coaching staff and the NCAA.

In 1906, the NCAA was formed to protect student-athletes by incorporating a compliance approach to ethics which would ensure student-athletes are not being exploited or endangered by developing and enforcing rules that lay out three types of violations and their corresponding penalties in order to keep games fair and respectful of student-athlete rights. In today’s world of college football which has become more of a business, rather just a sport, that can bring in millions of dollars as well as thousands of college applications yearly to many universities, the NCAA is there to prevent unethical behavior by objectively setting and enforcing standards of conduct while encouraging universities to also set up their own systems of compliance.

Should college student athletes be paid for the services they offer during their years of study? This has been one of the biggest, ongoing debates in college sports for years. Successes of bigger schools such as, the University of Alabama and the University of Texas in today’s society are major contributors to this debate. Those that are pro-salary argue that college athletes bring in too much revenue at their schools not to be paid. In my opinion, college athletes should not get paid because they already receive a scholarship that pays for tuition, classes, and housing; they also would not perform up to their full potential and there’s no fair way to pay these athletes.

Paying colleges athletes is one of the biggest debates in college sports history. The argument has been around for at least a decade, with people believing in positive effects and negative effects. College athletes have been playing sports without pay since the beginning. It has begun to gain popularity within the last few years due to incidents such as Reggie Bush. He received more than $100,000 in financial aid from the University of Southern California. Paying or giving gifts to players is a violation of NCAA rules. The NCAA is an organization that is in charge of college sports in the United States. The idea of paying college athletes has its pros and cons. Some people believe the pros outweigh the cons, but some people think different.

High School sports are safe havens for people all over America. Kids grow up and dream of bringing home state championships for the town they grew up in. However, more often than not they fall short. Public schools are at an extreme disadvantage in high school sports due to the simple fact that they draw from a set area of kids, while private schools can pick and choose. This leads to a question if whether public and private schools should be in a separate division for high school sports. Public and private schools should be in a separate division due to their ability to recruit, absolute dominance in sports and dwindling attendance of fans at sporting events.

There has been many occasions where high school teachers have to make a hard decision when an athlete is failing, what should they do. I believe that no high school athlete deserves any help from their teachers in order to play. They should be able to complete the circumstances needed in school if they truly wanted to play the sport these athletes are in. If this idea was allowed in high school what will happen to these kids later on in life like in college, will they be able to accomplish the goals at that point when it matters most?

The first time that I had any type of knowledge about the possibility of college sports being banned was just a few weeks ago inside of my English 101 class. I cannot express how surprise I was when I found this out. Not in a million years I ever would of thought a activity that most athletes live by every day can just go away in a snap of a finger. How could somebody even turn professional if they have not been in the college phase yet? Questions just arise in my head when I hear about this topic. How could a promising talented basketball player leave their high school and just go to the NBA without college guidance? How could a promising football player leave their high school and just go to the NFL without any college guidance. This whole topic has to be the most stupid thing I ever heard of and does not even deserve an piece of argument. I understand that more and more people are being hurt and seriously damaged, but let's be real, it's not like they don't know their risk. Everybody who play's an sports knows what their getting themselves into and the possibilities that can happen. In one article I read that a lot of brain damage incidents are happening prior to college sports, resulting in a ban on all college programs. I just don't get why all of the blame has to be on college sports. What about high school and junior high football, and youth programs like Pop Warner? If brain damage can be found in college players, shouldn't youth programs of sports and high school

Over the years, changes have been made to the postseason of NCAA football. There have been two major types of game series: the Bowl Championship Series (BCS) and the College Football Playoffs (CFP). The BCS was introduced to have the best teams in the nation voted to secure spots in bowl games, determining who is the best team of that year. The CFP let all games in the regular season help a team reach the playoffs and play in the championship game to be declared the NCAA champions. Although many people claim that the CFP’s are the best option for the NCAA, many people argue that the BCS is the better choice to conclude the football season, which leads to think if the change to the CFP was the right choice. The BCS should be reinstated because of its ability to have the top contenders for national champion play each other in order to be the best in the NCAA.

College football players are naturally at risk of injury. The reasons why are due to the aggressiveness of the sport,lack of proper technique, technology,and equipment used by players. The crazy thing is however, that's what we sign up for on a regular basis. There have been rule changes to help avoid injury, but a few rules isn't what is going to fix things. There must be new gear and medical test to make sure players are safe. If players wish to continue playing for a long period of time attention to their bodies is a necessity. Far too many football players careers are cut short due to brain injury and damage.Football players need better medical attention for their bodies.

In 1906 Theodore Roosevelt helped establish the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The NCAA was initially established to protect the players and improve the safety of sports like football. Today, the NCAA is a twelve billion dollar industry (Chris Beck). Most of the money is generated from ticket sales and merchandise. With this money generation the NCAA has strayed away from its original goals, which were to improve the safety of college sports. The NCAA has now begun to focus on penalizing athletes for breaking rules that they put in place.

Some college athletes were starving in their dorm after practicing and playing in games for a week straight. Since they make no money from the sport the play they decided to call and beg their coach to buy food for them. Recently the have been pushing him to talk to someone about getting them paid to play college football. This isn’t the only time this has happened. Student compensation has been a big topic in the world of sports. The NCAA has been an amateur league ever since its creation. It was never thought of widely to pay college athletes 10-20 years ago but many are thinking it may be it may be time to start paying the athletes. Since the beginning of college sports and the NCAA there have been many debates on whether or not college

The NCAA ball competitions, or "Walk Madness," have turned into an immense business. As Forbes' Chris Smith composed, CBS and Turner Broadcasting make more than $1 billion off the amusements, "thanks to some extent to a $700,000 commercial rate for a 30-second spot amid the Final Four." Athletic gatherings get a large number of dollars in payouts from the NCAA when their groups propel profound into the competition. Same for the mentors of the last squads standing. The NCAA, all in all, makes $6 billion every year.

Millions, even Billions have been generated by the National Collegiate Athletic Affiliation (NCAA) for more than 60 years. The NCAA has done this through entryway income, endorsements, TV, tournaments, and so on. In any case, college athletes have not gotten a solitary penny of this income. All the athletes want is money to help them get by in school, but because the NCAA is not paying them they decide to leave school for the professional ranks as soon as they can. While at these colleges, these same competitors are compelled to take out loans that will more than likely abandon them under water until the point when they can profit to pay it off. So now these children are not

When I was looking at our results I found some things that was interesting to me. I looked at if student athletes watched more or less of Netflix. The answer, to this is more. The student athletes are the ones who watched more Netflix. However, there was a few who said they watched a lower amount but, majority of the student athletes watches 3-4 hours a day 7 days a week. Then I looked at if students who worked watch more or less Netflix. The answer to this is less. Majority of the students who work stated they didn’t have time to binge watch unless they weren’t busy. Some also stated that they don’t feel like they binge watch because they only watch 1-2 hours a day and not all week. Then I looked into if the students who missed more classed binged more or less. The answer to this is, more. They had the tendency to binge watch every day. Then I noticed the students who stated, they didn’t binge watch had a higher GPA average and didn’t miss class at all.