The Pros And Cons Of Common Core

This article, written in 2014, titled, Common Core Switch Could Be Costly, gives the reader an overview of what Common Core really could do to American taxpayers. A taxpayer is someone who, “pays a tax or is subject to taxation,” (dictionary.com). The cost relates to how times have changed because a lot more money is spent on trying to give children a bigger and better education. When people think about how school was 100 years ago, and then think about where life has gone to today, there is a vast difference. Technology is one thing, but the way children were taught and how many children did not even go to school is quite another. But many differ from the point of view that it was better way back when, just as Kimberly Kennedy does in her article Common Core Is Working, Don’t Break It in which she states, “We must prepare our kids for a future where technology reigns and more jobs will require college degrees,” (Kennedy). Technology is an argument in itself, but it does play a certain role in Common Core, but that will come further along. Nevertheless this article argues the fact that Common Core is helping Kentucky with scoring higher grades on tests and becoming a smarter

The Common Core State Standards (CCSS) was first implemented in 2010, nine years after I graduated from high school. Although I wasn’t personally affected by the new academic standards, it has a direct impact on the current and future generation of leaders, innovators, and world changers including my future children. The initial purpose of the Common Core Standards is to set high-quality learning goals designed to prepare students to be college and career ready. Given the current controversies surrounding CCSS, studies have shown that although the intent was to benefit students in the long-run it may actually be hindering their mathematical and reading skills. To further explore the arguments behind the Common Core initiative, I will

There are many opinions to whether the Common Core should be enforced across the United States. One of the most wildly accepted views is that even though the Common Core could be a good idea, it is unnecessary, that America has done just fine without it. The Common Core is not working how it should and schools should go back to the way it was before. Many professors and researchers agree that the Common Core does not work and might even be hurting the youth of America. Parents who disagree with the Common Core have started pulling their children out of public school resulting in national education to be even less standardized, which is the opposite affect than what the Common Core was meant for. It is also not preparing students for future

If not every state actively follows Common Core, how can they be certain the lessons are being taught equally? Also, how can they monitor the grades when these are the standards that are supposed to be reached in 90% of all schools in North America? Their standards are intended to be challenging, but not all minds work in the same way. Each student learns differently and has different methods. I feel as though forcing each student to learn the same way is almost more harmful than helpful. Common Core sets a prime example of one of those ideas that seems flawless in theory, but later proves to be almost completely ineffective in

Forty-five states and the District of Columbia have already adopted the Common Core, due to “President Barack Obama’s Race to the Top initiative, which awarded more than $4 billion in federal grants to states that demonstrated a commitment to education reform and

The Common Core State Standards are considered to be a high-quality group of academic standards. Before the standards were developed, it seemed as if the progress of the students in the United States was remaining stagnant and that America students were falling behind their international peers. The blame for this setback has fallen on the fact that standards are not consistent and from state-to-state students are required to know different things at different grade levels. As a result students are not graduating with the same set of skills (Common Core State Standards Initiative, 2014).

Common Core State Standards is being heard throughout the education world. Many cringe when the words are spoken and many fight to support what the words stand for. Common Core was introduced in 2009 by state leaders. Common Core State Standards were developed to prepare children for the business world or the reality after grade school. “The Common Core is a set of high-quality academic standards in mathematics and English language arts/literacy, also known as ELA” (About the Standards, n.d.). The goals for the standards outline what students should know before leaving his or her current grade level. “The standards were created to ensure that all students graduate from high school with the skills and knowledge necessary to succeed in college, career, and life, regardless of where they live” (About the Standards, n.d.). This is an ambitious goal, but with much support can be accomplished. According to Common Core State Standards Initiative (n.d.) The Common Core has been adopted by forty-two states already and is accompanied by District of Columbia and Department of Defense Education Activity. Common Core was developed to improve the academics in society’s schools. Academics in the past years have not been successful and the United States has fallen behind international education. “One root cause has been an uneven patchwork of academic standards that vary from state to state and do not agree on what students should know and be able to do at each

Our country has been falling behind in the academic aspect compared to out international peers. Our remediation rates in college have grown over the past few years. The main problem is because our states vary in what they believe students should be able to do in each grading level K-12. So, technically Common Core Standards is giving students a better education. Based on my research from English Language Arts Standards, I found that the Common Core Standards are built off of these five standards:

Though the American Common Core has slightly improved national percents in Math and English, it has many adverse effects on our state rights, economy, teachers, and children. The fundamental goal of the Common Core is to get every school, teacher, and classroom in America to follow the same national standards. This system means teachers and parents have little power over what their children learn in the classroom; it is a federal intervention in state-led affairs. Another negative point about the common core is the massive price to run and implement. For example in Washington, “{The}Washington State Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction estimates that Common Core will cost the state $300 million.” And in California, “{The} California

In contrast, many schools have adopted Common Core because they have realized the struggle of living in a contemporary society; furthermore, they have realized the value education holds and have made an attempt to try Common Core. Many believe Common Core is used for the greater benefit of the children, specifically to improve their lives so they would not have to struggle as they grow older. Due to their mentality, the Common Core State Standard was established in 2009 where the National Governors Association had

Today, 43 states have voluntarily adopted and are working to implement the standards, which are designed to ensure that students graduating from high school are prepared to take credit bearing introductory courses in two- or four-year college programs or enter the workforce.” Common Core provides a benchmark for each grade which shows teachers what areas they need to work on with their students. Common Core advocates learning and implementing concepts using real world experience rather than memorizing facts. There are separate standards for both K-12 grade and high school graduates. Another main idea of Common Core is that all state will be have the same standards, which should level the playing field by making sure that every student that graduates is on the same page regarding academics. The website also gives a concise list of the characteristics they want Common Core to achieve: “The standards

Common Core is one of the most debatable topics in education today. In order to explain the significance that Common Core holds to our nation’s education, one must first define what Common Core is. The Common Core State Standards Initiative is an educational initiative in the United States that details what grades Kindergarten-12th grade students should know in both English and Mathematics by the end of each grade level. The standards were created to ensure that all students graduate from high school with the skills and knowledge necessary to succeed in college and the job force regardless of their geographical location. Common Core Standards are effectively implemented in forty two of the fifty U.S. States. Common Core Standards are internationally benchmarked which places our standards in the same rank as other countries throughout the world. Common Core requires students to actively engage in their learning through the use of hands-on activities as well as higher order thinking Q&A discussions that students often lead. Common Core State Standards are beneficial to education because they are more rigorous than and built upon previous state standards, promote equity between students, and prepare students to be more competitive in our global economy.

Like No Child Left Behind, Common Core is shaping up to be a failure that only causes resentment but hinders the learning experience. If you look beyond the standards that are praised by supporters of Common Core it seems that there is little benefit to the students, however, major reward and prestige is given to the textbook and testing companies. In addition for schools to receive funding they must accept the methodology of Common Core and change their systems. This coercive method of forcing schools to enact the system proves the negative perceptions and adverse effects of Common Core. “The program is incentivized with federal grant money that is given to states that implement the standards,” (Business

Common core is inappropriate for young children; it does not help them learn it making it hard to learn because of all the thing that have to be done with common core. Common core came together because of the education leader in the United States and other countries would benefit from a common core expectation for student completing a secondary education and would college and career ready. The goal in mind by the educators for common core is defining what student should know

Common Core gives all kids in the united states equal opportunity to do things in life. Common more is supposed to “develop a common curriculum that outlines what students should know at every grade level so that students attending different schools in different states get roughly the same education.”3 With this implemented in schools, there will be no disadvantage in living in a certain city of state because all the students will be getting the same education. This will make it so that the test results in every state will be roughly the same. Common core will also challenge students on the necessary skills such as critical thinking and problem solving skills. The necessary skills that a student will learn in common core is going to help them as they continue to college and careers.1 This is great because the whole purpose of schools is to prep the students for the next stage in their lives whether or not it be going to college or pursuing a career. Although the intentions of Common Core are all supposed to help students, the multiple flaws