The Pros And Cons Of Communication Technology

Sherry Turkle’s “Stop Googling. Let’s Talk” article was published on September 26, 2015 in The New York Times. The author explains that college students spend more time on their phones than talking face-to-face. Turkle mentions that parents have realized this at the dinner table with their kids or just trying to have a conversation with them. Teenagers and young adults claim that they can multitask and understand what the person is saying while being preoccupied. Multiple studies have been done to demonstrate the influence and behaviorial changes without a device. This generation reports that they feel more personal when their phones were taken away for a certain period of time. A boy from one of the studies describes this dilemma as “It’s what texting does to our conversation when we are together that’s the problem” (Turkle par. 6). Texting has become more popular as time goes on and college students were born in a world where phones were a problem and with new features coming out, they have become more intrigued. Using rhetorical strategies such as mentioning research studies and rhetorical appeals, the author effectively explains how technology changes society.

The article Sherry wrote explain that technology not only took over people but there community while Jenna Warthan, the author of “I Had a Nice Time with You Tonight “and a writer for new York times, argue that social media such as Facebook messenger, Twitter, Instagram and snap chat does not control us but help us be closer to friends and family at all times.Wortham also, admit that the internet makes us more comfortable, for example she says that video messages our more casual than phone

All advantages have corresponding disadvantages. Sherry Turkle’s essay “Connectivity and its Discontents” address her stance towards technological communication. Throughout her essay, she provides examples that illustrate how the world is consistently depending on technology for communication. Turkle’s opinion towards the issue is that, “she believes we’ll eventually sacrifice communication for mere connection.” Her examples make the reader consider that technological communication leads to human beings losing intensity in communication in both personal and professional situations because of distraction and convenience. The twenty-first century widely introduced a variety technological advancements which made people rely often on the technology. Thinking back to her opinion towards the issue I would agree with the idea that humans are becoming too attached to technology, but I would disagree that technology draws a wedge between people.

She finds that everyone even old adults who grew up without cell phones, tablets, or laptops seem to be hooked to being on their phones computers and other devices that allow us to connect to the internet. She seem to mention most is connection versus conversation and that devices that allow mobile connection affect the lives of all who use them young and old it changes how they act towards other people how they run their businesses and who they are. In Turkle’s narrative people have become accustomed to being enabled by technology we are “alone together”. We are able to be somewhere and elsewhere connected to whatever or wherever we want to be.

“No Need to Call” by Sherry Turkle is an article written about the relationship people have with technology, and specifically with communicating via technology. How it has affected the way we want to interact with people, or how we end up interacting with people. This being due to social norms having changed when it comes to our way of interacting, such as the meaning behind making phone calls rather than texting. The article itself brings up many viewpoints as well as different opinions on the subject, plus a few pros and cons to show that certain things are not always to be seen as black and white. Technology has its advantages, but even the most tech savvy, devoted people have to admit that it has its disadvantages, brought up in this article. Examples are brought up with each point to

For instance, after a student has told her that they would rather talk to a screen then their own parents about dating advice, she states, “this enthusiasm speaks to how much we have confused conversation with connection and collectively seem to have embraced a new kind of delusion that accepts the stimulation of compassion,” (138). She uses reasoning from her own studies explaining how technology has affected our attitudes and mentality toward certain factors. For example, a high schooler wants to talk to an artificial intelligence program about dating advice rather than another person, such as a parent or sibling because they feel as if they can only trust a computer screen more than their family. In another instance, Turkle incorporates reasoning into why technology has become a big factor in our everyday lives. She states, “In the silence of connection, people are comforted by being in touch with a lot of people. We can’t get enough of one another if we can use technology to keep one another at distances we can control: not too close, not too far, just right,” (137). Here, Turkle reasons that technology is a favorable option to many, in for instance, having a conversation, because one has control of what they are saying, how they are saying it, and when they are saying it. All with the benefit of editing. Turkle says that one would rather be

The use of technology has increased rapidly as time has gone by.  In “Growing Up Tethered”, Turkle proves that the young generation need to be connected at all times by relying on their phones a lot. Reality is now based on technology, which people now live off of. Turkle’s argument in “Growing up Tethered” was used in the form of a book, with a well-organized smoothly transitioned article telling of the disconnection of the world we live in today, due to technologies such as cell phones, and social networks. We are slowly becoming a society of distance amongst each other with face to face conversations being limited to 20minutes phone conversations, and on social network sights we are making a portrayal of a person who we are

It is widely accepted that technology can be used for people to connect with one another. One primary example that may spring to mind is the smartphone. No matter the distance between two people, the other party is only a text, call, or instant message (IM) away. In consideration of that, certain methods are favored over others. In her work titled “No Need to Call,” Turkle examines why there is a decline of phone calls. She surveys different generational demographics that bring her to the consensus that, regardless of age, texting holds wider appeal because there is less commitment involved. As a result, calls are more significant, only to be used if one is a family member or if the message cannot be properly expressed over text. Cases of the latter may even come with restrictions. One person that Turkle interviewed claims that it was easier to deal with traumatic news without immediately speaking about

In the article, “Stop Googling. Let’s Talk.”, Sherry Turkle claims that technology is leaving us vulnerable to the world. Cell phones along with other technology can be detrimental in certain situations. She bases her claim off of several experiments done with all ages of kids and technology. The article, written in 2015 and published in the Sunday Review, targets how the conversations today are becoming shallow because the world attached to their phones. Even though Turkle’s argument that conversations are dying and are shallow, her article shows evidence that conversations are different when phones are in sight. She offers vital information and evidence about scenarios where conversations are changed because of the use technology. She provides statements and facts that are true to our everyday lives especially our lives with technology.

In order to support her claim, Turkle uses examples from real people to describe how their interactions and behaviors are changing as a result of texting and emailing. The first girl that Turkle interviewed, Audrey, talked about the power texting gives her compared to phone calls stating, “In texting, you can get your main points off; you can really control when you want the conversation to start and end. You say, ‘Got to go, bye.’ You just do it” (378-379). People prefer are starting to prefer texting over phone calls because they feel they

She uses different apps to communicate with her long-distance boyfriend (393). Wortham says “ These interactions help us feel physically close, even if they happen through a screen.” (394). Conversations feel more casual to her then normal conversations. She says “... it feels more like the kind of casual conversation you might have over a meal or while watching television together.” (394). She quotes Turkle in her essay, “ Turkle.. Said technology saturated type could ‘forget what a face-to-face conversation can do’” (396). Wortham disagrees, she explains, “ If anything, the pervasiveness of technology in my life has heightened my desire for actual one-on-one meetings.”

They see the bad side of the technology and fear for the destruction of society by the encroaching technology. In "No Need to Call," Sherry Turkle shows how social media and text message are changing our society. She is worried about how these new ways of communication are affecting our

Turkle’s use of logos is possibly the strongest part of her argument. One could argue that her argument is lacking because it does not possess any statistics or solid facts and relies solely on examples from her personal experience. However, Turkle does not base her conclusion on some singular instances but on a diverse and wide range of similar situations, which I think makes up for her lack of data. She proposes three main grounds to support her claim. Beginning in the eleventh paragraph, Turkle states, “Texting and e-mailing let us present the self we want to be. This means we can edit… Human relationships are messy… We have learned the habit of cleaning them up with technology… In conversation we tend to one another… we are called on to see things from another’s point of view.” Her main point in these quotes is that technological communication does not accurately simulate a real and meaningful conversation. The underlying

Technology has revolutionized communication and the world like nothing before. The Internet has given the world a freedom never explored in the past. The Internet has broken communication barriers to an extreme level. Now day’s two people from two different countries can talk or chat without interactions. Internet has given people the ability to connect forever through social networking. Some of the biggest world social networking services are Facebook and Twitter. Through technology communication is made much easier, but the communication with the people that are right next to us might be getting weak. Technology has its positive and negative impacts on society. It could keep us informed, but it could also affect anyone’s communication life. Even though it’s an easy communication barrier it’s being over used by society every day. The Internet has charge everyone and everything over the years, it has giving us the ability to be informed on a much deeper level. Families are losing their communication, but not just because of technology. Not everything is positive when it’s about technology. It could help us connect no matter the distance, but we could lose communication and relationships. The world has not yet notice that losing important face to face communication because of technology it’s important.

Sherry Turkle argues the point of how people have sacrificed conversation for mere connection (Turkle 136)