The Pros And Cons Of Crusades

The Crusades were great military missions developed by Christian nations of Europe for the purpose of rescuing the Holy Land of Jerusalem from the hands of the Moslems. Jerusalem was extremely important to the Moslems and Christians at this time. Many religious events happened there, and many landmarks of both religions were located in Jerusalem. There were many Crusades some more significant than others, but in general the Crusades were very important to the spread of Christianity and religious based knowledge. The Crusades are an example of religious rebellion that is timeless and universal throughout the world.

The Crusades was a horrific time. Many people had lost their lives, friends, even family. The Crusades were a battle over the holy land, Jerusalem. The Crusaders, people who had fought in the Crusades, were Christians. They wanted the holy land because they believe that’s where Jesus had died and rose. They had fought against the Muslims who were defending themselves against the Crusaders. The Crusades had its positive outcomes as well as its negative results. Some may wonder, were the results of the Crusades more Positive or Negative? I strongly believe the outcome was mostly negative mainly because the Crusaders didn’t win the holy land, lots of lands were destroyed, and so many people lost their lives in the battle of the Crusades.

According to an article published in 2009, it is believed that there were a numerous effects of crusades:

The Crusades were a group of Christians that Pope Urban II started back in 1095. They also had 9 Crusades, or 9 times when they would attack to get the Holy Land, against the Muslims and Jews, but mostly against the Muslims. During those battles there were both positive and negative. Were the results of the Crusades more positive or negative? The Crusades were more negative than positive because they worsen their relationship with the Jews and Muslims, or religious hatred, they destroyed and betrayed their closest ally, and their towns or cities were difficult to handle.

Many people may wonder were the Crusades more beneficial or were more people against the things that crusaders did like war or the things the believed in. Many people think that the Crusades were more negative because of religious hatred and cause death. Also the Crusades were more negative because they were difficult to maintain.

The crusades were more negative than positive because there were many innocent people were killed because of their religion. In document 1 it states In Europe, crusaders sometimes turned their fury against jews, massacring entire communities. They would do this just because they were

The crusades were a combined of nine wars for the holy land in jerusalem. Were the results of the Crusades more positive or more negative?The results of the crusades were more negative. Because it grew religious hatred between the three also the crusaders sacked the city of constantinople.Also because of the slaughter of the jews which left hatred.

The Crusades were a bloody war that the church deemed holy and necessary for salvation of the knights soul. The Crusades are a highly controversial and very dark stain on the Catholic church and Hierarchies past. The war was brought to the church from there Roman allies who they had tense dealings with. The where seeking aid in the fight against the muslim turks. The church decreed there act holy and justified. The people who were under the churches thumb had no objections to the slaughter that their beloved God had suposably justified.

The crusades was a religious war between Muslims and Christians started primarily to secure control of holy sites considered sacred by both groups. The crusades occurred in the Middle East between 1095 and 1291, there were nine crusades in total. Ask anyone if they’ve ever heard of the Crusades the answer would most likely be yes. But does that mean they know what the crusades were. No. And most people are unaware of the beginning of the bloodshed that took place. So what was the beginning? How did it all start?

The first crusade was the first Christian journey to Jerusalem, the holy land so that they could aid the Eastern Christians lay siege to the city and take it back from the Saracens, a name for the Muslims during the Crusades. In November 1095, Pope Urban II called for the first crusade and announced it at the town of Clermont, central France. He proposed that Christians go to Jerusalem to liberate the church in the name of religious devotion, a cover-up for people seeking honour or glory. The crusaders were mainly comprised of peasants from France and Germany. When the crusade began on the 1st of November 1098, Bohemund and Raymond Toulouse both claimed to be in charge; an argument broke out. While the Crusaders captured the town of Ma’arra, Bohemud returned to Antioch and captured the city for himself. Bohemund proposed that he would let Raymond lead the crusade if he could have Antioch, and so Raymond led the crusade. On 7th June 1099, the crusaders finally reached Jerusalem. It is said that as the great walls of the city came within sight they wept with joy, but this was not the end of their journey. Jerusalem had solid defence and was heavily guarded which presented a challenge for the Crusaders as they did not have the necessary siege equipment to break through the walls as that would require wood which was scarce. Then a priest had a vision that if the Soldiers marched around the city 3 times bare foot. The crusaders did this and within a week they took control of the

Founder of Constantinople, Constantine claimed the great Byzantine Empire and in turn inherited the new Holy Roman Empire. With the Edict of Milan in 313, Constantine proclaimed religious tolerance of Christians throughout the empire and soon the religion spread. Constantine then transformed the city of Byzantium into the new capital of the Roman Empire, which then was known and proclaimed as Constantinople. The new capital would profit from its location being closer to the east frontier, having then the advantage of better trading, and a militarily sound location being protected on three sides by water.

The Crusades had 9 of battles and the Crusades still affect us to this day. Do you think that the Crusades were more positive or negative? They were more negative because only had battles and wars to take their land or to get back at them.

European Christians began a series of nine wars between the eleventh and thirteenth centuries known as the Crusades. The Christian crusades sought to reconquer the Holy Land of Jerusalem from the Muslims and had both a positive and negative impact on the Eastern and Western worlds. The positive effects of the Crusades were unexpected. The original goal of the Crusades was to repossess former Christian holy lands under Muslim rule in order to strengthen Christian Ideology throughout Europe.

The Crusades were a series of holy wars, they are characterised as taking vowels and granting indulgences to who participated in the crusades. The have fought against many cities, religions. The crusades left the legacy bitter and hatred behind them. It states in the D.B.Q packet “Christians and Muslims they committed appealing atrocities in the name of their religion, moreover turned their fury against the jews massacring the entire communities.” Mostly the Crusades were negative the always fought people, blamed people then they would kill them. They would join the Crusades just to kill people if they didn’t believe in god it was apparently wasn’t true the Pope would say that so they can't take over the city again. Those are the most main

Even though Europe lost its control of the holy land the crusades still benefited Europe in many many ways. Such as the exchange that happened during the Crusades facilitated the spread of the Islamic math and science. This had exposed the Europeans to improvements in there navigation techniques. These advancements had helped to usher in Europe's age of exploration and that led to nearly five whole centuries of European cultural ans economic dominance