The Pros And Cons Of Designer Babies

Gender of a child may not have much significance for some couples wanting a child, but this was not the case with the Masterton family.

With the advancement of genetic technology parents may soon be giving the option of modifying their unborn children.If this happens I’m sure the x-linked disorders will all be a thing of the past. No more passing down bad genes to your children. Mitochondrial manipulation technologies is a controversial topic many countries have banned its use. Some people feel that you should let mother nature run it’s course with making babies while others feel genetically modified babies are a thing of the future.

Technology is quickly advancing, and many opportunities only dreamt about previously have developed. One of these opportunities arising is designing your baby. Currently, scientist can eliminate genetic diseases or screen for gender, and in the future, will be able to choose various traits. Pursuing this research of designer babies is creating a conflict though. Through multiple techniques, scientists can alter the embryo to the parent’s desire but while this has numerous benefits, there are also many concerns.

The article “Ethics of Designer Babies” by Sarah Ly Keywords addresses a variety of perspectives regarding the controversy if designing your baby with your own characteristic s desired and a less percent of giving them any disease is a ethical or unethical problem for society. In the first place, this article explains the specific definition of designer babies. Designer  babies are a babies whose genetic makeup has been artificially selected by genetic engineering combined with in vitro fertilization to ensure the presence or absence of particular genes or characteristics. Vitro fertilization begins with an embryo DNA being modified and then introduce in the womb.

With all the freedom in America, is it fair to design a child? “A baby developing from an embryo created by in-vitro fertilization and selected because it had or lacked particular genes, the genetic makeup often having been notified by genetic engineering” (Dictionary,com), If this were to become popular the world would lack racial diversity and there could be genetic consequences.

Over the past decade, the scientific technology of genetic engineering has grown drastically. Online articles propose that the chance to pick the accurate characteristics a guardian wants for their child will be accessible, “Any couple with several thousand dollars to spare can choose the sex of their offspring” (Ehrich and Williams, 2004). Progressed regenerative advances permit people and specialists to screen embryos for a hereditary issue and select solid developing lives. Although Designer babies have been a subject that has been banned in China, UK, and India, it is still a mainstream point far and wide. This subject brings a considerable measure of verbal confrontations about the basic, yes and no, but additionally about when and when not.

For years the discussion on designer babies has been up surging and is now at the forefront of many medical and academic discussions. An experimental technique, known as gene therapy, birthed the idea of designer babies (“Gene Therapy”. GHF). This very experimental technique, why, uses healthy genes to treat, or rather prevent diseases that could be passed down from parent to child. However, scientists have ventured to further expound on the concept of preventing disease to a more cosmetic and superficial approach. The more imposing science of gene therapy would attempt to take science further into the realm of altering physical characteristics ultimately allow parents to choose their babies eye color, gender, and other physical characteristics that have no bearing on the child 's well being or health. The term now coined as “Designer Babies” is used to describe how by using gene therapy, parents can quite literally design their babies employing genetic screening combined with in vitro fertilization to alter otherwise naturally occurring physical appearances. Whether or not this revolutionary new science should be banned in the United States has become a very controversial topic in the U.S. igniting the strong opinions of scientists and politicians alike. Those in opposition believe that gene therapy is unethical, arguing that science is pressing toward a level that is morally perverse by allowing science to create the next generation instead of

Science is now able to better improve human health and safety thanks to the advanced modern technology and medicine that are available. Yet with today's technology being implemented into science comes the questions of human morality, or bioethics. One of the bioethics debates is on the coined term “Designer babies”; on if or where society should draw the line on genetically altering our children before they are born. With the technology able to stop hereditary diseases, the scientific development’s are able to change the child’s “eye color, hair color, social intelligence, right down to whether or not your child would have a widow’s peak” before the child is born. From the options on choosing whether or not your child will look or act a certain

The purpose of a designer baby is for the parents to be able to artificially select the baby’s genetic makeup, usually to produce desirable traits such as appearance, personality, and intelligence, can also be modified. This will provide the child with many advantages in life if it is given more genes that can increase athleticism, intelligence, artistic ability and plenty more according to the parent. Not all of these options are currently available because our technology is too limited. In the

With the new technology being created these days, things that people thought couldn’t happen, is happening. Scientists have discovered ways to make babies meet the criteria their parents want. They refer to these as designer babies.

Engineering designer babies who are perfectly healthy, intelligent, and athletic is just a glance at what the future may hold. This brings about controversy involving the ethics. Society would be dividing from genetically engineered people and natural people. The rich who can afford the treatment will be superior to those who cannot afford it. In society, people’s individuality will be stripped away. The child does not even have a choice in what happens to it. Engineering designer babies in the future may ruin the society people live in today.

For the society of GATTACA to exist, there needs to be lots of technology/information that are necessary. The future of a society like GATTACA is not to far in the future. Some information that will be needed for a society like GATTACA to exist, is being able to identify what genes and traits a human has based on a blood sample, in the matter of a day. The technology of being able to create “Designer Babies”, needs to be available for a society like GATTACA to exist. Scientists and doctors will need to be able to have the ability to extract any imperfect genes from the sperm or the egg to prevent any imperfect traits of an offspring. Last in the movie GATTACA, they had the technology to determine one’s DNA sequence in the matter of minutes using a sample of them. This technology is a must if a GATTACA society ever existed.

The remarkable advancements in technology and the exceptional discoveries in science has brought this generation one step closer to unlocking the secret to the modification of embryos to our own wishes. Designer babies allow society to customize offspring that hold certain, desirable traits through the process of genetic engineering during in vitro fertilization. Although scientists have possibly found a way to genetically modify the genes of a human embryo, it has become clear to me that I disagree with the process of engineering a child as people will use it only for appearances, be misused that’ll lead to a form of abortion, and create a gap within society.

I believe that parents should be able to choose the characteristics of their children, for clients can benefit by choosing to genetically

Thats were society argues that this treatment has gone too far. Parent should not change their child’s natural features, as its just not right. According to the bible Genesis, chapter 1, verse 27 - “So God created mankind in his own image”, we were created in the likeness of God, therefore modifying any aspects of ourselves would be against God. Genetic alteration of human embryos is not supported by the Catholic Church as it is against their beliefs.