The Pros And Cons Of Disarmament

1676 Words7 Pages
Human invented disastrous things like atom bomb hydrogen bomb etc. to rule the world but actually it is not happened. In reality atom rule the world now.
There are mainly three peace keeping approaches in the international politics to manage the war or big threat to the world like world war first and second, cold war and terrorist attacks by the means of arms and destructive weapons and nuclear weapons which can ruin the world, those approaches are :-
1. Arms control
2. Disarmament
3. Collective security
Disarmament is the process of reducing, limiting or abolishing weapons. Disarmament generally refers to the type of military or specific weapon system in a country. The most common form of disarmament is the abolition of weapons of
…show more content…
in support of the disarmament which imposes restriction on these countries to stop the missile programs or destructive weapon program.

AIM AND OBJECTIVE OF DISARMAMENT
“Thousands of nuclear weapons remain on hair trigger alert. More States have sought and acquired them. Nuclear tests have continued. And every day, we live with the threat that weapons of mass destruction could be stolen, sold or slip away. As long as such weapons exist, so does the risk of proliferation and catastrophic use. So, too, does the threat of nuclear terrorism. . . . Nuclear disarmament is the only sane path to a safer world. Nothing would work better in eliminating the risk of use than eliminating the weapons themselves.” : BAN KI-MOON, United Nations Secretary-General

Disarmament is a phenomenon which has some serious objectives for the mankind, it is not for the individual, and it is concept to protect the whole world and civilization from the arms, weapons, wars like world war 2nd and calamities like Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It has some aim and
Get Access