The Pros And Cons Of Dual Citizenship In Singapore

Citizenship is the legal status of an individual living within a particular country. Having citizenship gives people rights and responsibilities as well as a sense of belonging to a community. Citizenship can influence the lives of people as it gives people a sense of identity and how to live their life.

“National service is a small individual sacrifice for the sake of a country’s defense.” Is totally referring to Singapore as even though we are a little red dot we still have quite a strong army due to our individual small sacrifices. As our NSmen makes up to more than 80% of the Singapore military defense. Which shows that even

While the initial sparks of Singaporean nationalism may have stemmed from being under the British colonial rule or arose due to the brutality that the people were put through during the Japanese Occupation between 1942 to 1945, it is difficult to ascertain exactly when the start of Singapore’s nation building efforts began. Characterized by the process where a large body of people associated with a territory commits to its own government, I would define the start of Singapore’s nation building process from the time its people started to strive for their independence. In this essay, I would argue about how the Japanese Occupation was indeed, a significant turning point that led to cultivation of Singapore as a nation.

The United States is not the only country that questions the necessity for dual citizenship. This article is surrounding the issue of dual citizenship in Canada but it highlights similar issues to those brought up in debates on this subject in the U.S. The main argument is if people with dual citizenships should receive the same treatment as a plain citizen. Choosing to live in a particular country shows one’s commitment and membership to a country. By attempting to become a citizen of another country may seem like a betrayal of the original country. This article, similar to many op-eds surrounding this issue, uses ethos to prove its point. The morals surrounding criminal activity and its consequences are stated. The argument is how people

To obtain American Citizenship is something that you can do and you must follow different steps, which are very important. Exist different ways to legalize your status here in the U.S., It can be with the help of a lawyer, or you can do it by yourself, or if you born her on the United State you do not need to do anything. You just have to provide everything the lawyer require from you, or if you want to do it alone, you can go to the website of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services www.uscis.gov. Many foreign people can obtain U.S. citizenship, make their dream come true, and get a better life for themselves as well for their families.

Mexico does not require anyone to renounce citizenship of the country an immigrant hails from. A potential citizen merely fills out a form and turns it in with some other paperwork, and a fee, then waits a few months to be called back. When the call summons the citizen candidate to the immigration office, the candidate fills out even more forms, pays another fee, and waits an extra couple of months. Once that process is complete the immigrant receives a naturalization certificate allowing them to live in Mexico. From there the person is required to study the history of the country, learn Spanish and after two years have passed with them living in Mexico they can take the naturalization test. Immigrants are highly advisable to contact the Embassy of the United States for Mexico before moving to Mexico, to make sure there are not any surprises or extra details that should be taken into consideration. The embassy website can be found at: http://www.usembassy-mexico.gov

Birthright citizenship is the term used to refer to the citizenship that is granted to an individual who is born on the associated territory. Providing an individual with citizenship of any state or country means that one now has the rights, privileges and duties of a citizen in the related region. In the United States, birthright citizenship is a highly

Application for citizenship is different in every country and the United States and Canada demonstrate this fact. Although they both have similar basic structures, the U.S. system has more exceptions and a generally longer process. Both countries require Permanent Resident(PR) status and one must be 18 years of age or older to apply. They also both allow parents and guardians to apply for citizenship for their children and make exceptions to the general rules in those cases. While both require an extended physical presence in the country before they sign their application, Canadian law allows applicants to count days as a temporary resident or protected person towards that requirement whereas the United States does not; further, they differ in the details, as in the U.S., generally (there are exceptions), one must have not been out of the country for 30 months or more, must have not

Singapore and Malaysia were both similarly colonized by the British. However, their development after independence differed in many ways. In this paper, I will examine, with help from resources provided in the course and minimal research, how their colonial experiences affected their political and social development after independence. After which, investigating the depth of influence their colonizers had, and why, differing racial ideologies had the greatest impact on their development.

qualify for naturalization if you are a U.S. citizen, the child was born outside the U.S., the

The dual definition of citizenship from May Joseph’s article Nomadic Identities: The Performance of Citizenship, can be used to analyze the different forms of citizenship that are presented in the film, Bend it Like Beckham, directed by Gurinder Chadha. Citizenship is typically referred to as someone as being considered a member of a country under specific laws. This general idea of citizenship is further analyzed in Nomadic Identities: The Performance of Citizenship. The article presents the idea that citizenship is found to be more than a member of a country and is concluded that citizenship can be much more personal and unique to each individual person. There is more than one definition

Since Singapore’s establishment in 1965, the government of Singapore had adopted a genre of paternalistic leadership in many areas (Lee, 2008). Personally, I have so far taken the view that it was the most fundamental thing for this tiny oriental country.

As the majority of people have different definitions of the word multiculturalism as well as different views on the cultural and political impacts, I will put forward the different views throughout the chosen texts. As stated in the text ‘The successes and failures of multiculturalism’, the author defines the idea of multiculturalism as “the essence of multiculturalism is the idea that, if one makes immigrants feel welcome by allowing them to retain their culture and by seeking to address discrimination against them.” (Manning, A. 2011, page 1) This text argues that the apprehension about multiculturalism is interconnected to the conviction that in the United Kingdom, not all the minority groups that are living here consider themselves to be British, due to their ethnicity. In the table showing the Percentages Reporting a British National Identity by Ethnicity, on the second page of the ‘The successes and failures of multiculturalism’ text written by Alan Manning in 2011, it is shown that each different ethnic minority group have certain percentage of their population living in the United Kingdom that consider themselves to be British nationals, whether they were born in the United Kingdom, or abroad. Though the percentages diverge between each minority group, there are still a large number of people that consider themselves as British Nationals (Manning,

Nationality and citizenship are central components of human security on the grounds that they give individuals a feeling of having a place and personality. They give a legitimate premise to the activity of numerous human rights. Persons without a nationality are in numerous nations denied various human rights that natives underestimate, in the same way those people lacked from human basic rights, such as access to schools and therapeutic consideration, responsibility for, marriage and establishment of a family and delight in legitimate assurance. All around the world, unfortunately an expected 15 million individuals are viewed as stateless.

The rapid advancement of society in recent years has greatly increased connectivity and communication capabilities across the globe, such as the development of the worldwide network known as the Internet. The increased connectedness between countries has also brought greater visibility to the substantial cultural differences around the world, from religious freedoms to accepted social behaviors. This global expansion has furthered the opportunity to promote the development of global citizenship, which Reysen and Katzarska-Miller (2013) defined as the embrace of cultural diversity through awareness, acceptance, and the promotion of social justice and responsibility. Global citizenship allows individuals from many cultural backgrounds to develop productive relationships by decreasing the tensions brought on by cultural differences, as well as promoting open sharing of contrasting views to develop better ideas as a group (Wang & Hoffman, 2016). Becoming a global citizen is essential to furthering societal development, improving cross-cultural communication, and promoting awareness and acceptance of different cultures.