The Pros And Cons Of Federal Gun Control Laws

The United States should make stronger gun control laws because it is possible that guns can get into the wrong hands. Imagine an unstable person carrying around a gun, anyone is at risk. “In 2007, Seung-Hui Cho, a student at Virginia Tech, used two guns to kill 32 people and wound several others in two attacks two hours apart on the college campus in Blacksburg. Cho, who had a documented history of mental and emotional health problems, had nonetheless been able to purchase guns because the state of Virginia had failed to share his history with NICS.” (“Gun Control”, 2016, pg. 5) Thirty-two families will suffer from losing their loved ones because there was not an extensive background check. There are mentally ill people who are not seeking treatment that legally buy guns

The debate over gun control has been raging through the American political systems for years. On one side, there is the National Rifle Association (NRA) and 2nd Amendment-citing citizens who use their firearms for hunting and self-defense. On the other, there is Handgun Control Inc. (HCI) and followers of the Brady Campaign who want to ban guns on the basis that they are dangerous. Both sides have strong arguments, anchored in historical precedent and statistical analysis. Anti-gun control lobbyists’ arguments include the guarantee of the 2nd Amendment, the definition of “militia” as any adult male, self-defense, the relative uselessness of permits and regulations, and court cases in favor of firearm possession. Pro-gun control activists

What gun control laws are going to help stop mass shootings? Even if the government banned the sale of assault rifles and guns in general,people with bad intentions are going to purchase them illegally. In the three recent mass shooting that caused many deaths, the shooters got their guns illegally with no trace of the sale on these weapons. Sandy Hook,Columbine,and San Bernardino were all mass shootings where the shooters got their guns illegally, stole the gun from family members or other people, and caused a lot of danger and harm to people. There would be no regulations to stop them because even if there were stricter gun laws, they still would be able to purchase their guns illegally.Stricter gun laws will not prevent crime,people will still get illegal firearms,and no sales to the public will reduce revenue.

Should gun control laws be changed? Well, first, gun control is entirely based off the notion that people are committing gun related crimes because they have access to them and these debates are whether or not the nation should ban guns entirely. This whole rebel of gun control change is said to help reduce violent crimes (Swickard). This is a well-known debate in today’s world. Many are involved in protests all around the world, while their schools are getting shot up and are asking for changes to make gun control laws stricter. However, the fact is, guns are not the problem in this world, it is the individual. If you put a gun in a criminal’s hand, they could do whatever they wish. Gun control laws should not be changed because current laws

Through 1999 and 2013, there were approximately 464,033 deaths by guns (ProCon.org). The U.S. should enforce gun control to minimize the amount of deaths by firearms. The debate of whether gun control laws should be enforced or not began in 2002, when at least 20 children were killed in a mass shooting in Connecticut. On average, 96 deaths occur daily and about 13,000 gun homicides strike the U.S. yearly. The origines for America’s extensive ties to guns originates from the Second Amendment, revolutionary roots, and frontier expansion. The U.S. should enforce gun control laws to reduce gun deaths and prevent hazardous situations between two or more enemy parties.

Gun Control has been a main topic lately throughout social media and news networks due to all the mass school shootings and other gun related crimes! People are calling for stricter laws on gun control. In 1981 President Reagan rejected a call for additional gun legislation, saying “there are today 20,000 gun control laws in effect being federal,state,and local in the U.S.”. So what we should be asking for instead of stricter laws on gun control is the laws that are already in place be enforced more diligently. Thus insuring less criminals and mentally ill are able to obtain firearms and commit heinous crimes. Everyday 96 people of all ages die from gunshot wounds either by murder, assault, suicide,or police intervention. With already 20,000

Gun control laws should be strictly enforced because individuals can take advantage of the relaxed enforcement and harm others.

With all these shootings happening around the country, many people believe new, stricter laws on guns would prevent these tragedies from happening in the future. One of the main reasons that people believe gun laws should be stricter is to reduce the deaths caused by guns. Whether it be suicide or homicide caused by guns, stricter gun laws would bring down the rate of that. In the article, "Firearm Legislation and Firearm Mortality in the USA: A Cross-Sectional, State-Level Study," written by Bindu Kalesan, Matthew E. Mobily, Olivia Keiser, Jeffrey A. Fagan, and Sandro Galea it says, “There were 464,033 total gun deaths between 1999 and 2013: 270,237 suicides (58.2% of total deaths); 174,773 homicides (37.7%); and 9,983 unintentional deaths (2.2%).” This statement proves that guns cause many deaths. Because of these deaths and tragedies, it is driving people into thinking that guns are bad and shouldn’t be permitted in the

In this paper I discuss why gun control laws are working. I am in favor of very strict gun control and removal of guns from the hands of criminals. I n the paper, I discuss some of the most objectionable practices:

With more and more people starting to get fed up with all of the gun control laws, the question is, should gun control laws become more lenient or should they become more strict? First point is that people kill people not the guns. Second, people should be able to use guns as they like without breaking the law plus the gun control laws don’t deter crime. Last, if guns are getting taken away then other things should be taken away too that some may not even think about.Many people think that they should be more lenient and that is a very valid side of the story.

A DAY HAPPENS like any other day. Then some guy asks you for all of your card information. You refuse. He then pulls a Vector (a sub-machine gun, still fully automatic) and points it right at you. Luckily, the police pull up and take him away for illegal assault. Automatic guns and rifles are banned for civilian use, mostly because of how dangerous they are. This is the gun control law.

“I have a very strict gun control policy: if there is a gun around, I want to be in control of it” (Clint Eastwood). Every year according to ATF statistics, over six million guns are sold on average in the United States alone. As of 2015, gunviolencearchive.org reported 46,350 incidents related to firearms. Out of those incidents 11,664 deaths were attributed by a firearm. “Staggering numbers on both fronts with no resolution in site. The second amendment states “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” many have challenged this right, and it has become one of the most controversially debated subjects to date.

Gun control and gun safety is a highly debated topic throughout the government. Between the candidates for president, Senate, and Congress there are tons of different opinions and laws that different people want passed. The government has made some decisions that some people are upset about concerning guns. The government will continue to make decisions in order to control gun safety.

Did you know that when trump was elected gun owners thought this was good because he would agree with them and he believes in the second amendment? I am writing this article on behalf of the second amendment which is in great danger. This right was put into the bill of right so that the government could never overthrow the people of american and so that the people know if they were to try to overthrow us we had things to protect ourselves with rather than just our hands and words. This right is important not only because we need to protect ourselves and family but also to protect us from the government.The second amendment is under attack because people feel do to the gun violence in the world today we should take guns away to prevent the violence from happening.

Some people think that their needs to be stricter guns laws why some think that the laws we have in place now are fine. This essay will compare and contrast two different viewpoints about our 2nd Amendment rights. Jeffrey Goldberg is a staff writer for The Atlantic and says that America needs stronger gun laws in place. John Malcolm and Jennifer Marshall both work for the Heritage Foundation and they state that our 2nd Amendment rights should stay the way they are. While Goldberg has very strong points about ways gun control can be fixed with longer waiting periods, and more background checks, Malcolm and Marshalls points are stronger stating that gun problems will be fixed focusing on state and local levels, in the community within the