The Pros And Cons Of Forced Sterilization

The idea of eugenics made it possible for involuntary sterilization. In order to improve the human race, it meant regulating reproduction. 1907 Indiana passed to sterilize the mentally insane and inmates. Their plan was to eliminate “defective” genes. By 1960 63,000 people were involuntary

The Birth Control Movement of 1912 in the United States had a significant impact on Women’s Reproductive Rights. Women in the 1800s would frequently die or have complications during or after childbirth. Even if the woman would have died, they would still have a great amount of children. As the years progressed into the 1900s, the amount of children being born dropped. Because of this, birth control supplements were banned, forcing women to have a child that she was not prepared for or did not want to have in the first place.

In the mid-1800s American women united to participate in social reforms movements more than ever before. This movement’s involved: struggle to abolish slavery, outlaw alcohol, and ban child labor among others (Rupp, 1987). Despite the failure of the women's movement to attain one among its primary goals, the passage of the ERA , the movement overall accomplished an excellent deal. For several women activists, management over their bodies was a central issue in the campaign. Women needed to be liberated to explore and control their gender, while not being judged by society. An oversized a part of management during this arena concerned having access to birth control, or contraception ways (Fishman, 1998). The contraception pill, associate inoculant,

Sterilization legislature was enacted on the state level with the goal of physically preventing the procreation of individuals deemed to be unfit, mainly handicapped persons or criminals. Though the nature of these laws did not outright target certain races or social classes, a disproportionate amount of the individuals sterilized were non-white or of immigrant background. Prominent eugenicists and eugenic organizations in the U.S. played a key role in lobbying for state sterilization laws. Harry H. Laughlin, superintendent of the Eugenics Record Office, drafted the American Model Eugenical Sterilization Law in 1922, which served as a model for many sterilizations laws in the states (Berenbaum, 1998). By 1926, 23 states had passed sterilization laws that were voluntary and/or involuntary in nature (Sofair, 2000). Laughlin and other eugenicists called for the sterilization of institutionalized individuals under the assertion that their “genetically inferior” traits would be passed to their progeny and be an economic drain on the state. Many states complied, and by 1935 over 30 states had some form of sterilization law with over 21,000 compulsory sterilizations performed (Allen 1997). Though the eugenic nature of these laws was stressed by eugenicists, it was acknowledged that the political support of such laws were greatly financially motivated. Another important legislation passed by the U.S. was the Immigration Restriction Act of 1924, which was the first immigration quota

When one contemplates the concept of eugenics, few think of modern contraception and abortion when in reality they are one in the same. The American Eugenics Society, founded in 1923, proudly proclaimed that men with incurable “conditions” should be sterilized. However these conditions were often none that could be helped, such as, one’s intelligence, race, and social class (Schweikart and Allen 529-532). The purpose of the society was to create the perfect class of men; elite in all ways. Likewise, Margaret Sanger’s feminist, contraceptive movement was not originally founded with this purpose. It was marketed as a way to control the population and be merciful to those yet to be born, again determined also by race and

In the state of Kansas between 1913 and 1961, Kansas practiced forced sterilization on mentally unstable women.” In addition to laws regarding sterilization, several marriage restriction bills were proposed in Kansas as part of the eugenics movement. Although they were never enacted as state law, marriage bills were proposed in 1915, 1917, and 1927, demonstrating the popularity of eugenic ideals.” (University of Vermont…Kansas). Dr. F. Hoyt Pilcher performed 150 sterilization in the Kansas State Home of the Feebleminded. Between the years 1913 and 1916 there were 1,274 women sterilized in Kansas. In the year 1921, sterilization in Kansas was at its all-time lowest. Between the years 1950 and 1963, sterilization in Kansas was at its peak. It is

Humans have been engaging in sexual acts since the beginning of time. Sex has evolved from reproducing to sustain life, to being one of the most intimate experiences one can share with another. Knowledge about safe sex was limited, so people would have it whenever they pleased. Contraceptives were not widely available before the mid 1800s, so people would have unprotected sex and not know the serious implications it could lead to. As the years progressed, people realized that without taking the proper precautions, sex could leave them with life changing consequences, so something had to be done. In 1916, Margaret Sanger took it upon herself to open up the first birth control clinic where women could receive birth control. This was the beginning of the Planned

Lorenzo smith Mr. Alvarado P.5 Gilded Age During the Gilded Age America was going through a time of extreme change, advancements, and also conflicts. The gilded age was originally coined by Mark twain who described the times as gilded with gold and fortune but under the surface was filled with unnoticed conflicts. The Gilded Age lasted from 1870-1900 and was a time of rapid economic that created some of the big businesses we know today.

he most significant reason against this policy includes the violation of female rights in behalf of the government deciding the number of infants a family have to have and the increment of crime against women. Since, 1979 the law has prevented around 250 million births since ultrasound tests and abortions became easier to access (Doc E). Also, since ultrasound tests are more accessible this policy created sex discrimination and the number of abortions increased since they could find out earlier if they were expecting a male or female (Doc E). It is imperative to mention that since there's fewer woman, woman became more vulnerable to suffer a crime against them and it represents the power the government is capable of using. This information

On May 2, 1927, the U.S. Supreme Court, by a vote of 8 to 1, decided the case of Buck v. Bell. This decision gave affirmation to the constitutionality of Virginia’s law which allowed state-enforced sterilization and determined that compulsory sterilization laws did not violate due process given by the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. This decision established the legal authority for sterilizing a toll of U.S. citizens that would grow to more than 60,000 in over thirty states until as late as the 1970’s.

Sterilization of the developmentally disabled or the mentally retarded is an issue that has long been debated in America. Mental retardation is defined as the inability to learn normally and develop mentally. Traditionally in America if a mentally retarded person was born to a family, that family had 2 choices- take care of the child at home, or it was strongly recommended that the child was sent to a state run institution or hospital. The state institution was where this person would spend his or her entire life. Unfortunately these hospitals were often huge warehouses of people with disabilities, or mental illnesses. These hospitals offered no contact with the

Stange says that a women’s right over her body was one of the earliest rights women obtained. This means that women had the right to refuse sexual acts of their husband in order to avoid pregnancy. Procreation was a large factor in a women's market value and thus allowing a women to control this aspect of her life, if contraception is not available,

Just because someone lives with a disease doesn’t mean they are immune to the idea of bearing children, what if they want to experience the rollercoaster that is having a child? What if they change their mind and later want to conceive? Then thanks to sterilisation they will be forced to live their lives with regret.

The act of removing a woman’s ability to have a child, also known as sterilization, is a common way for governments to exert control over their people. Globally, sterilization was used as a way to control social behavior, but most practices were abolished in the 20th century. Forced sterilization was declared “an act of violence, a form of social control, and a clear and documented violation of the right to be free from torture” due to the clear discriminatory practice that harmed victims both psychologically and physically (Frohmader, Australian Civil Society). Despite this, sterilization is an ongoing practice in Australia originating in the early 20th century. Australia has permitted social and legal negligence when it comes to the sterilization of disabled women due to societal pressure and inconsistencies within the law.

The people’s lack of morals led to an even more severe issue, a severe decline in population because of urbanization and industrialization that was under way (L.C). To ensure the economy’s increase, industrialization and a plentiful population, he decided the only way was to implement an anti-abortion policy. The policy was introduced in 1966 with the description of “ … prohibited abortion on demand” (Bachman). This decree also included the introduction of other pronatalist acts that would increase births. The decree outlined several requirements that must be followed: