The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control

The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Courts have universally agreed, however, that the right provided by the Second Amendment is not absolute and that many kinds of gun legislation designed to protect public safety remain valid ("Gun Safety & Public Health," 2013). The ongoing debate between the gun rights versus gun control has caught more attention as number of cases involving gun violence increased significantly. In one study, it stated that major mental illnesses are associated with increased risk of violent act. In recent years, there were several news headlines on

“Gun are designed to kill. They have no other function” (Bowman and Newton). Today, there is a major debate whether or not guns should be legalized or stay legal. The Second Amendment allows people to right to bear arms, but many people disagree with that and to express their opinions, both sides protest. Guns have a long history in the United States. They were made for military purposes and are now used for anything a individual wants to use it for, like for example hunting. Stricter gun control laws should be enacted because they will cause fewer deaths, save money, and for increased public safety.

The Constitution states the second amendment as, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”1 This amendment gives the people the right to own and carry guns for their protection and for the security of their homes. There are many controversies surrounding the issue of people owning guns and gun related violence because of the second amendment. One of the biggest controversies is the regulations on gun control regulating what type of guns people may possess and what kind of registration is required. The tenth amendment says, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”2 The second amendment (along with all the other amendments) is under federal jurisdiction; therefore the states do not have power in this case.3 The second amendment gives the right to all American citizens to bear arms, therefore, the States do not have the power to regulate what type of firearm they may possess and how they carry or keep it.

Gun Control has been a long debated, and hot topic among the American population for many decades. The 2nd Amendment to the United States Constitution states that, “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”. Both sides of this debate have very logical arguments for increasing gun control or lessening gun control. These arguments tend to spike shortly after active shooter events, eventually having some type of legislature passed to prevent these atrocious acts from happening. But ultimately active shooter events continue to plague the United States, and much of the world.

“I have a very strict gun control policy: if there is a gun around, I want to be in control of it” (Clint Eastwood). Every year according to ATF statistics, over six million guns are sold on average in the United States alone. As of 2015, gunviolencearchive.org reported 46,350 incidents related to firearms. Out of those incidents 11,664 deaths were attributed by a firearm. “Staggering numbers on both fronts with no resolution in site. The second amendment states “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” many have challenged this right, and it has become one of the most controversially debated subjects to date.

The gun control controversy initiated in the 2010's after the amount of mass shootings in the United States began to rise exponentially. The shocking amount of gun related incident sparked a desire for more control. Two arguments are based on what restrictions should be active when buying a gun. These restrictions are formally known as gun control. According to New York Times, gun control is defined as: "a broad term that covers any sort of restriction on what kinds of firearms can be sold and bought, who can possess or sell them, where and how they can be stored or carried, what duties a seller has to vet a buyer, and what obligations both the buyer and the seller have to report transactions to the government." Recently, the debate has no clear winner, with both sides having loads of facts and statistics to support their claim. Throughout this expository, you will discover the advantages and disadvantages of higher gun control, and the effect that guns have on crime rates.

Gun control, it’s a common topic that gets thrown around debates very often, whether the second amendment should remain legal or it should be banned in the United States. I, among many law abiding citizens, prefer to keep the second amendment within our government just like it has been since our founding fathers signed the Declaration of Independence. However, with this law still in place, it also means anybody over a certain age, depending where they live in the United States, can buy a gun. This puts me on edge because not everybody in our nation is a very self-controlling person, regardless of their gender, ethnicity, religion, and so on. This brings back those tragic moments in our generation such as the Newtown School Shooting, where a man walked into an elementary and shot little boys and girls, and also teachers. Or that time when the man shot many innocent bystanders inside the Pulse Nightclub in Orlando with a rifle and handgun. That is why there should be strict background checks for anyone who is going to buy a firearm, because it’s important to know just who exactly is going to buy a gun.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." - The Bill of Rights.“The 21st century” a backdrop for the War On Terror, has since changed that view on the right to bear arms enough to call for major gun reform. Orlando, Florida 50 killed and 53 injured June 12, 2016. San Bernardino, California 16 killed and 24 injured December 2, 2015. The media slanders two weapons of so called “terror”, the infamous AK-47 and the AR-15. The AK-47 a soviet made weapon a by product of the cold war, and the AR-15 a weapon invented to combat the AK-47. Both weapons are used in many mass shootings, in fact the New York Times calls both assault rifles

Gun control to some people has its pros and cons, but to me all it has is cons. Gun

Gun control has been a long debated topic. There are many pros and cons to each side, this essay will discuss both of them. First I will discuss the pros. The first pro to more gun control laws would be it would update the law. To start off many people believe that the gun laws are old and outdated so it’s time for a change. The second amendment was ratified in 1791, it is 2017 and guns today are completely different from guns made in 1791. In 1791 one of the most advanced firearms was a Girandoni air rifle, this gun held about thirty bullets. The first shot was the most powerful and each shot after declined in energy. One of the most advanced guns that can be legally owned today is a Barrett M82, this gun has a maximum range of about 7,450 yards, but the most effective firing range is about 2,000 yards. This gun is very powerful and has about 15,000 foot pounds of energy at the muzzle. Guns today are increasing in power, and are more dangerous which is why people believe that updating gun laws would be beneficial.

There are 105 deaths per minute and 55.3 million deaths per year. The large debate is what is causing these deaths, and what might lead to the end of humans.

Some people like it and some people hate it. Gun control is not needed. I am against gun control. Taking guns away from people will not keep criminals from finding a way to get one.Therefore rendering people defenseless. More gun control leads to less suicides and homicides. Gun control laws do not prevent suicide,people will just find another way to kill themselves. If the government tries to take our guns away,the people with guns are not going to do it peacefully. People don’t understand the second amendment, they need to understand and then they will stop. If they take our guns away, then the government will take over.More gun control is not needed; education about guns and gun safety is needed to prevent accidental gun deaths. Strict

In today’s society we see more and more people getting killed by guns than we have in the past. It has become a major topic of conversation throughout the United States. Every time you turn on the TV, there has been some sort of senseless shooting. The victims of these shootings vary in age, gender, ethnicity, nationality and economic status. Americans are starting to become angry and scared. They want to know why this is happening to them and their community. However, ask yourself do guns kill people or do people kill people? It takes a person to load the gun, aim it and then fire the weapon. This then in turn results in the homicides we are seeing today. The same can be said of other physical objects and weapons such as cars, planes, knives, golf clubs, and many other objects when placed in the wrong person’s hands. All in all, the end result is death.

Gun control is a clear safety measure in our society today. Some gun stores do not use background checks, or the laws are not clear, so civilians can find loopholes to still use/make guns and buy the ammunition needed (Times Editorial Board). If these laws were made clearer and were stricter, events such as school shootings could see a significant decrease. Gun control is crying out for a reform to make our societies safer for our friends, families, neighbors, and co-workers.

For many years, people have been pushing the American government to implement new laws that deal with gun control. Supporters of the argument claim that increased gun control will drastically reduce the crime rate in America. Nevertheless, a majority of gun control arguments are formed from strict control of data and emotional appeal. The mainstream media picks up these stories and broadcasts them to viewers without providing any context to them. While gun control activists assert that gun control is necessary, the American government should not ban guns because of the following reasons: potential vulnerability of innocent people being shot at by criminals and the inability for people to defend themselves against their own government.