The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control

For many years, people have been pushing the American government to implement new laws that deal with gun control. Supporters of the argument claim that increased gun control will drastically reduce the crime rate in America. Nevertheless, a majority of gun control arguments are formed from strict control of data and emotional appeal. The mainstream media picks up these stories and broadcasts them to viewers without providing any context to them. While gun control activists assert that gun control is necessary, the American government should not ban guns because of the following reasons: potential vulnerability of innocent people being shot at by criminals and the inability for people to defend themselves against their own government.

As firearm ownership and firearm manufacturing have been increasing over the past twenty years, gun murders have been decreasing (“Gun Rhetoric” 2). Although, many mass shootings have taken place over the past twenty years and have inflamed the gun control debate. The major problem with enacting more gun control laws is most mass shootings have happened with illegally obtained guns.

This article stood out to me as the author of this article does not have a strong stance in any of the side regarding gun control. However, it has convincing content of gun control in both side of the argument. I plan to use this article’s points in relation to the cons of gun control, and express it to my audience. Nonetheless, I plan to revoke every appeal the other side of argument holds for gun control.

Gun Control has been a hotly debated issue for many years. In modern American politics gun control is debated between the left, who seeks to increase gun control laws, and the right, who seek to protect gun ownership. Gun Control should not be enacted because Gun Control Laws have been proven ineffective, The Second Amendment allows American Citizens the right to keep and bear arms, and Gun Control laws take power from American Citizens.

Many think that if gun control laws were put into place then it will save lives. However that is not exactly true. Handguns purchases should not be limited. “Most handguns used in crimes are stolen and passed frequently from criminal to criminal or purchased not by mass gun buyers but by a friend or relation-which would not be affected by ‘one handgun a month’.” By limiting the purchase of handguns, it will not save people from killing others. Either way with or without gun control laws, people are going to steal guns to kill. Concealed guns should be allowed. “‘Shall Issue’ concealed carry laws, which allow ANY law abiding citizen to carry a concealed pistol, have spread to 40 states across the US since 1987. Millions of ‘average’ Americans exercise this right, and there have been no explosions of crime, shootouts over parking spots, or road rage gunfights.” People throughout the years have carried a handgun, and it has not been a problem yet. Therefor, why change it if it is not a problem. With more guns does not mean more accidental shootings. “But it is a fact that gun accidents have reduced in a number much faster than gun ownership has increased. And in every household there are dangerous items- household cleaners, swimming pools, and other items that cause many more accidental deaths than guns….” There are more than guns that are dangerous, but nobody is going to take them away due to their enjoyment of it. Why not make laws about swimming pools or household cleaners? An abundant amount of people think that most deaths are caused by guns, and that’s why they want gun control laws

In light of recent tragedies like San Bernardino, Aurora Colorado, Sandy Hook Elementary and many other mass shootings. The heated debates over how much and what kinds of gun control the country needs are beginning to come up in the news again. Companies, politicians, and anti-gun activists are calling for a total and complete seizure and ban of all firearms (citation). But what they truly don’t know is that gun control flat out doesn’t work.Bans on assault weapons like the AR-15, AK-47, FN SCAR, and the Saiga 12 just to name a few. As well as restrictions on handgun sales, magazine sizes, and calibers all do nothing to stop gun violence in America. Honestly how can people think that the only way to protect the people is by taking away their

Many people have different opinions about gun control and they may view this matter in different ways. Some people may ask, “What would we protect ourselves with?” Some people might say, “It’ll help save lives.” I believe that gun control will not help with the problems that we are currently facing. I also do not believe that gun control will help these shooting sprees that are occuring. The first reason why I believe that gun control will not make a change in our society is simply just wondering; when gun control passes, how many criminals or people with mental health issues, are going to give up their gun? The answer is none. Unfortunately, it would be too complicated for law enforcement to take away guns from all the people who already own them. According to a newsday article, it states that, “ There are about 270 million

It’s been brought to my attention that gun control laws have an ever-growing presence. People have made claims that guns made the world a dangerous place. Sure it does, but that doesn’t mean that they should be banned. It comes down to the person using it, not the gun itself. Some may argue that gun control laws would help, but it really won’t. They say it will make less crimes, less suicides, and many other things.

People have argued for decades whether we should or shouldn’t enact more gun control laws. More gun control laws should be enacted because it could reduce gun violence along with reducing the amount of deaths and crimes caused by guns and reduce teenagers from obtaining guns.

I believe the number one argument we hear when discussing gun control is that guns are dangerous and lethal weapons, that do nothing more than hurt people. And I would have to agree completely with these arguments, but just because this is true does not mean that no one should be allowed guns, or their choice of gun. Of course they are dangerous weapons with 8,300 people dying from unintentional shootings between the years 1999 and 2010 (Violence, 2016). Not to mention the average of 268 people shot every day in the U.S. alone (Record, 2013). It’s quite clear why people would be so eager about ensuring gun laws are strengthened to bring these statistics

Just speaking the word “gun” can immediately spark a heated debate. To some, guns are talked about like they are children. The more you possess, the stronger they make you feel and appear to others. There has been a lot of debate over whether or not to reform gun laws. A lot of Americans believe that gun control laws aren’t doing enough to make citizens feel protected. On the other hand, there are some who believe that if these laws were changed, their Second Amendment rights would be infringed upon.

The reason that I chose this topic is lately becoming a controversial issue among the society. While some are for more laws to control the use of guns, others are entirely against this approach. Personally, I am for strict laws that can limit the use of firearms.

Currently gun control has been amidst one of the most thought of debates not only in recent times, but also in prior occasions. The mass shootings occurring more-often lately have fueled the altercation pertaining to one subject, gun control. Gun control may have many different meanings, or descriptions varying from person to person. One may think that gun control is banning guns all together, banning a certain category of weapons, or banning certain items like high capacity magazines, and flash suppressors. All of these would be forms of gun control, but the true meaning of gun control, as stated by an online article What Gun Control Could Look Like, “Gun control would allow citizens in the United States to still purchase firearms, but there would be reasonable regulations on firearms” (Greenblat). This statement introduces the idea that gun control would not be banning guns, but banning items that are unnecessary for civilians to have possession of. Banning all guns cannot happen because it would be infringing upon the second amendment, the right to bear arms. The second amendment cannot be changed or challenged, but perimeters may be set to keep guns and people’s capabilities with them limited. A firearm in the hands of a criminal or someone with bad intentions is not good, but it can be prevented. Gun control needs to happen, or mass shootings and high rates of violence will continue to occur in society.

The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Courts have universally agreed, however, that the right provided by the Second Amendment is not absolute and that many kinds of gun legislation designed to protect public safety remain valid ("Gun Safety & Public Health," 2013). The ongoing debate between the gun rights versus gun control has caught more attention as number of cases involving gun violence increased significantly. In one study, it stated that major mental illnesses are associated with increased risk of violent act. In recent years, there were several news headlines on

More gun control can save the lives of people. Most people who suggest no gun control give many arguments to support their cause, but one of the most common is, "Guns don 't kill people, people kill people." ("Rolling Stone", 2015) There are many reasons why this statement is wrong. One reason is that this is not true because guns kill people no matter who pulls the trigger of the gun. Also, it doesn 't matter how much hate is in the man who pulls the trigger, like in a mass shooting, the absolute amount of damage a gun can do in a span of five to ten minutes is tremendous, thus giving the reason to limit the type of guns that one get obtain.