The Pros And Cons Of Gun-Free Zones

Gun control has and probably will always be an issue that is argued for or against from all political sides, regardless, of your own beliefs one must look at the pros and cons of gun control to determine what is necessary. To address this, we must first look

For this reason, it is incredibly hard for the country to agree or disagree on controversial topics such as gun control. Gun control laws and restrictions are methods in reducing the accessibility of firearms to the ordinary citizen. The belief is that with less dangerous firearms in the streets, the less crime there will be. Numerous studies and evidence show that a reduction of gun ownership can ironically increase the crime rate. This trend might seem counter intuitive but when seen at a different perspective, it becomes logical. When law abiding citizens are not able to purchase a weapon but a criminal is through illegal means such as the black market, it leaves people helpless against the gunman. Many advocates for gun control seem to ignore the facts and trends that show that gun ownership and crime rate does not have any correlation. Instead, these advocates seem to rely on the emotional appeal of people, exploiting the tragedies that are caused by shootings, wars, and criminal activities. The purpose of this essay is to educate people on the negative side effects of gun control and on how guns can actually decrease

“Are gun free zones worth having in American schools?” Through the recent struggles in policy related to mass school shootings in gun free zones, I believe that we should evaluate current policies and if need be, propose new policies, to limit or eliminate mass shootings in schools, which can and should be prevented. A common misconception when talking about ‘gun free zones’ is that Gun free zones can easily be misunderstood as meaning zero guns, but rather (usually) means that an unauthorized person cannot carry in that area (which may vary from state to state). But the issue isn’t with the misconception, but more so with the lack of safety that schools have or so we think.

What gun control laws are going to help stop mass shootings? Even if the government banned the sale of assault rifles and guns in general,people with bad intentions are going to purchase them illegally. In the three recent mass shooting that caused many deaths, the shooters got their guns illegally with no trace of the sale on these weapons. Sandy Hook,Columbine,and San Bernardino were all mass shootings where the shooters got their guns illegally, stole the gun from family members or other people, and caused a lot of danger and harm to people. There would be no regulations to stop them because even if there were stricter gun laws, they still would be able to purchase their guns illegally.Stricter gun laws will not prevent crime,people will still get illegal firearms,and no sales to the public will reduce revenue.

Gun rights and gun control are always hot items during any political discussion, whether it is between peers or politicians. One of the many great advantages to being an American is the ability to choose for one's own self what to believe in, another advantage, in my opinion, is the right of the people to keep and bear arms. It is my intention over the next several pages to make you aware of my point of view on the issue of gun rights. I will bring up arguments for gun rights and against gun control, citing all sources used. Some topics to be discussed are the Second Amendment, media influence on weapons violence, and the effects of crime rates in areas that allow open or concealed carry. I would like to preface with some safety notes,

The gun control epidemic has swept across America like wildfire. Opposing views on gun control have been argued tirelessly to no avail. As guns become more readily available, a great number of protests come forth. This seemingly never-ending cycle is at the forefront of most North American's conscience.Whether these protests are on the local news stations, newspapers, or on the abundance of social media outlets you cannot escape the gun control conversation and propaganda. Many people believe citizens should not have access to guns and others believe in their rights to bear arms. Both points of view boil down to who these people believe needs protection.

In modern day America, it seems like there is a never-ending amount of issues and controversial topics. Opinions on these different topics are virtually everywhere. They are on the news, on the radio, and especially social media. People have very differing opinions on these issues. These people have different reasons for having the opinion that they have. One huge topic that is always being talked about is gun control.

Due to the increasing number of senseless public shootings involving multiple victims, the controversy between supporters and non-supporter of stricter gun control laws are at an all-time high. The key reason why there has not been a sway in either direction is that there are too many unanswered questions in the argument for or against gun control. Since gun control is such a broad topic, if the argument was narrow down than those in favor of stricter gun control laws would have a chance of persuading the majority. By hindering or prohibiting the purchasing or owning of handguns by civilians, multiple, pointless deaths are avoided. Furthermore, arguments such as people are to blame and guns are the most controllable would fall apart and even the Second Amendment could not back the rebuttal.

Since the very beginning of the United States, gun rights and gun control have comprised one the most controversial debates of the county. On one hand gun rights advocates believe that the right to bear arms is a basic human that should not be in any way violated, and on the other hand gun control advocates have long been thriving for a complete ban of guns. The debate has grown over time from reasonable arguments for gun rights and regulations to an ideologically polarized and extreme argument, making it extremely hard to find any common ground between both ideas. The compromise between gun rights and gun control becomes even harder with both arguments having strong ethos at one point and losing their ethos at another. By zooming the

These two killed fourteen and injured seventeen innocent people. The people were in shock and tears because of the incident. The people inside were forced to find cover and hide so they wouldn’t get shot. This is tuck in their minds forever and most will have ban feelings about being in gun-free zones.

In recent years, violence has affected society immensely; in the Las Vegas community specifically, bullying, and crimes involving deadly weapons have been detrimental to the hearts of families.

A DAY HAPPENS like any other day. Then some guy asks you for all of your card information. You refuse. He then pulls a Vector (a sub-machine gun, still fully automatic) and points it right at you. Luckily, the police pull up and take him away for illegal assault. Automatic guns and rifles are banned for civilian use, mostly because of how dangerous they are. This is the gun control law.

85% of Americans say that they favor making background checks for buying guns stricter. 88% of Democrats and 79% of Republicans support this cause (Dent). Despite this fact the background checks are still debated by the government, while everyday more people are getting their hands on dangerous weapons. Gun control laws need to be stricter to prevent mass shootings and other violent crimes with high powered guns.

There are a few laws that I would change, simply because I do not agree with the conditions of these laws. The right to bear arms, the legalization of marijuana, and the transportation of alcohol are examples are laws that I feel need to be adjusted or edited.

Logistically there is no way to end this type of crime, however there are preventative methods we can use to reduce the occurence of them. This tends to be a touchy subject between gun holders and those who aren't. Speaking on behalf of those who do not possess any type of firearms, they tend to argue that guns should be banned and that there should be stricter rules against who can obtain one. Whereas those who do carry firearms believe that guns are not the problem it is the unrightful people who use them. As people and guns are the overall problem we first must begin somewhere, and that is by doing thorough background checks on those who are looking to own a gun. By distributing civilians personal information into the system this allows