The Pros And Cons Of Gun Massacres

The author makes several main claims throughout his articles such as, “national news stories are virtually never done on permit holders stopping mass public shootings,” and “the proposals put forward by gun control advocates wouldn’t have stopped this attack.” The columnist firmly believes in the power of the second amendment and as such, he wants to limit the amount of new laws that control how much the people can hold and use weapons. The claims listed are claims of fact and policy respectively. He gives several examples of how these different prevented mass shootings were not widely advertised and how the ones that were not stopped were all over news stations to convince people that guns are not helping the common people. The author then proposes that the changes that gun control advocates propose will not make a difference and begins to give reasons why which makes this a claim of policy. He says that making a change will not make any change so the laws should be left the same as they are now, or they should be more inclusive to allow more people to carry a concealed weapon.

Guns are one of the most controversial and debated-upon topics in America today. In the Constitution, Americans are given “the right to bear arms,” and many Americans are proud of and believe strongly in that right. Though, that right has been constantly misused. Homicides by gun are at a higher rate in the United States than any other country in the world, mass shootings are at an all time high (many of which have occurred in the past two years alone), and terrorism has been at an all-time high. So, naturally, it is a topic that needs to be discussed. In the articles Change Your Gun Laws, America (1), author Fareed Zakaria provides the readers with some harrowing statistics on guns and insight over how the U.S. laws on guns need to be managed.

In the past decade alone, there have been countless mass shootings in the United States alone resulting in a large body count. Whenever a mass shooting occurs, a debate always follows about how easy it is to obtain firearms, despite background checks that have been enacted to make it difficult to purchase firearms. Background checks are “designed to determine if the prospective buyer fits any criteria that prohibit purchase or possession of firearms, including a prior felony conviction, certain domestic violence misdemeanors, unlawful use of controlled substances or, inter alia, commitment to a mental institution.” (Vernick et al. 98). Background checks are necessary for public safety, but people manage to maneuver their way around background checks when it comes to purchasing a firearm. A background check is not required when purchasing from an unlicensed dealer such as an online store or dealers at a gun show. People prohibited from purchasing guns go through unlicensed dealers because they are not required by law to perform background checks for a firearm purchase. For example, four to ten percent of online shoppers are prohibited by law from possessing firearms, yet they still are looking around in online

Well over half of the population in the United States own a firearm of some sort. There are over one-hundred and fifty laws in the United States, this includes state and government laws. These laws are very strict when it comes to carrying guns and handling them in public, but the problem is it is very easy to get a gun permit online or through a short class. In the process of getting a firearm simple questions are asked such as “Have you ever been convicted of a felony? Have you ever been convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence? Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any other depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance? Are you a fugitive from justice? And Have you ever been committed to a mental institution?” After these questions the clerk will call the FBI to run a background check on the person buying the weapon.

Why do Americans buy guns? Is it for fun? Is it to hurt people? Do Americans buy guns for good or bad reasons… or perhaps both? This paper will answer these questions as well as other target questions, which include: How trustworthy are permit holders? What qualifications do concealed carriers need to meet in order to carry a weapon in public? Most Americans who purchase firearms do so for protection, whether it be for protecting themselves, their families,

That is to say, the absence of mandatory background checks, and making gun licenses a legal requirement for the possession and/or ownership of firearms, will still facilitate the job of the mentally-ill and gangs to commit crimes. The problem is that the gun rights groups, whether the NRA or local advocacy groups all around the U.S, have a great distaste for compromise, and as result, passing such fair gun regulations becomes extremely difficult. But to frame it very clearly, the solution for the crime issue is neither banning guns completely nor giving full freedom for possession and ownership, it is simply the balancing gun rights with realistic restrictions that promote public safety. However, neither gun rights nor gun control advocacy groups acknowledge that fact although the data and studies support it. A deeper look into the development of gun rights and gun control agendas in the US beginning with the pre-Civil War era, explains why the two sides of the debate are so extreme about their ideologies.

Gun violence is a major flaw in our schools and in communities at large. There were 28 people that died in the Sandy Hooks school shooting on December 14, 2012. At the columbine high school shooting on April 20,1999, there were 15 people that were killed. At the Stoneman Douglas High School shooting on February 14,2018, there were 17 students and teachers that had been shot and killed. Since Columbine, there has been 122 deaths from school shootings.

Gun control has been a long debated topic. There are many pros and cons to each side, this essay will discuss both of them. First I will discuss the pros. The first pro to more gun control laws would be it would update the law. To start off many people believe that the gun laws are old and outdated so it’s time for a change. The second amendment was ratified in 1791, it is 2017 and guns today are completely different from guns made in 1791. In 1791 one of the most advanced firearms was a Girandoni air rifle, this gun held about thirty bullets. The first shot was the most powerful and each shot after declined in energy. One of the most advanced guns that can be legally owned today is a Barrett M82, this gun has a maximum range of about 7,450 yards, but the most effective firing range is about 2,000 yards. This gun is very powerful and has about 15,000 foot pounds of energy at the muzzle. Guns today are increasing in power, and are more dangerous which is why people believe that updating gun laws would be beneficial.

The wake of so many recent tragic mass shootings has sparked controversy on gun control. Those who oppose the control on guns present arguments against these proposals. The contentious issue tends to divide people into different sides. Both sides believe they are in the right, while the other is in the wrong. The fact still remains that the United States should enact stronger laws on gun control to further prevent catastrophic tragedies.

Gun control regulation is a set of laws and policies designed to regulate the manufacturing, sale, purchase, and use of guns by civilians. Gun control has been a dividing topic, especially over the last decade among Americans. Firearms are a staple of American culture and society. Many Americans own firearms, for recreational purpose in the form of hunting and/or target shooting. Many also own guns as a method of safety and protection in a society characterized by violence. However, we continue to see a trend in mass shootings were guns are too frequently, being used for senseless violence. The mass shootings in Las Vegas and Texas have prompted the country to revive the tireless debate about gun violence and whether we can combat it with gun regulations. The issue specifically stems from the frequency of gun violence in the U.S. The issues of gun violence continue to be fought by both gun rights activist and gun control groups alike both groups lobbying Congress to craft legislation in their respective favors. The debate continues on whether laxer or stricter gun control laws will help protect citizen and limit mass shooting and violent crimes. In my paper, I will show both the pros and the cons of gun control arguing for both opposing views. I will do this using background information as well other supporting facts and evidence. I will conclude my paper with a possible suggestion of solutions to these issues.

Every year thousands of people die from gun violence because of bad laws and race. In the past there has been lots of gun violence.

The controversy regarding the regulation of guns in America is always a heated topic -- and as mentioned above, one of the main issues people have is the easy access in which people are able to purchase guns; this is an issue not experienced in many other developed countries. The history of gun control in the United States spans back since the colonial era of the Civil war, ever since guns were first used in the country. This history of gun regulation in America is not new, and many incidents concerning gun-related violence have sparked controversies about how the implementation of gun regulation in the country is something that needs to be addressed as an alarming issue (Kwon, Scott,

The most recent news headline lately has been centered on the deadliest massacre in Las Vegas, according to Criss, CNN reporter it killed 58 people and wounded over 500 people by a man who was able to obtain gun ownership, and explicitly killed innocent lives, a tragic lost for everyone affected. Another deadly attack that shaken the nation, happened in Connecticut 2012, it was a tragic school shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary school, the aftermath according to Cowan, of the New York Times, diagnosed the shooter Adam Lanza with Schizophrenia. Both of these massive shootings led to many young lives taken away too soon by destructive gun violence. So the question that’s still on the rise and still a wide ongoing debate, should gun violence be banned? Will banning, or regulating guns stop a person to commit such violence, and crime?. America is home to hundreds of guns, legally or not, people will manage to obtain firearms, and after all under the second amendment of the constitution citizens have the right to bear arms for self-defense. However, when firearms are in the hands of an individual who are not in the right state of mind and use guns as an assault weapons, or gun violence that should be the nation’s priority concern. Shift our attention, and instead closely focus in attempting to prevent people who are at risk; such as people with mental illness, criminal family history of domestic violence, strictly, meticulously monitored, so firearms weapons can thence be kept away out of the hands of these highly at risks individuals, in addition improve economic and increase educational opportunities for mental health care.

Restricting firearm purchases will leave many American’s defenseless from attacks. Criminals would have little problem getting hold of firearms, while the average law-abiding individual will not have hold of firearms. When the average citizen cannot have weapons, criminals whom possess weapons would easily be able to attack. This reason alone is the primary contributor to the use of weapons; people buy firearms to protect themselves and their family. Ms. Alcazar, a 41-year-old mother, lives in a suburb called Chelsea and has little interest in hunting. She explains that her main motivation to carry weapons on her goes as follows, “I have three very important reasons why I carry a gun… And those are my children.” (Troy Griggs) This interview with a

In America weapons have been a piece of the nation’s general public. All throughout history the natives of the US have use guns to ensure the country, secure their families, chase for nourishments and take part in the sporting activities. The issue of gun and weapon control is overwhelming. The definition of gun control is: government regulation of possession and use of firearms by private citizens. In order to purchase a weapon you must go through some background checks. In this month's issue of Preventive Medicine, Sen and Panjamapirom (2012) explored the association between background checks on an individual seeking to purchase a gun and firearm deaths across U.S. They watched that firearm retailers could check no less than six “foundation”