The Pros And Cons Of Harry Potter Books

When a book is in the process of being banned, it first has to be challenged by somebody. “A book being challenged” is basically by a person or a group of people who get together, make petitions and find all the wrong things about a book just for it to be successfully banned. If you research on why some classic books are banned you’d be surprised with the reasons. For an example, the famous,

“Book Banning” may seem like an issue of the past, but, in fact, it is still a very pertinent issue in the U.S. today. These classic books have been banned at one time or another: Catcher in the Rye, To Kill a Mockingbird, The Color Purple, Huckleberry Finn, The Grapes of Wrath, The Harry Potter series. You’re probably wondering how these, extremely famous, books can be so censored in America today. There are many reasons that are given in regards to book censorship. For instance, language or profanity, violence, sexual explicitness, or “uncomfortable” topics, such as rape and race relations. Christian groups have requested that a countless number of books, with Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, or Queer (LGBTQ+) themes, be taken out of schools and libraries The banning and censorship of books can happen in many places and ways; taking them off school reading lists, or even out of libraries and bookstores.

Even though we have the right to the First Amendment, many books have been banned or challenged in the U.S. Books have been banned for many reasons including profanity, sex, violence, religion, etc. The First Amendment states “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a

Isn't banning books disobeying the freedom of speech, and infringing on the freedom of the press? First Amendment, states that "citizens must be free to seek out any media, regardless of content, that they deem appropriate for entertainment, information, or education. With said, banning books stunts the extension of education. In addition, Books containing “Racial Issues, Blasphemous Dialogue, and Sexual Situations” parents' supervision is indicated. So, if read by children; banning books will not be an antidote for bad parenting. But, Most opponents of book banning understand parental preferences regarding their own child’s reading material, but they refuse to grant them the right to make a decision on behalf of all parents about what is or isn’t appropriate. The disadvantages, books can teach you a negative habits and that’s why some books should be banned. Literature will fully-develop children for the real-world.

In our world, firemen fight fires. In “Fahrenheit 451, “the firemen burns books. They do this to fight ideas and to keep their society safe from disruptive influences.

All it takes to challenge a book is for a parent or other citizens to file a complain against a teacher, library, school, or bookseller, for that reason many teachers and librarians choose to remove the books from the curriculum or shelves before an issue is brought up (Pitner). The fear of a lawsuit keeps many people from expressing their belief that banning books is unnecessary (Kennedy, Banned Children’s Books).

Many books have been questioned and challenged. Even as far as to banning them. But what exactly is a banned book and why are they banned? A banned book is a book that has been censored by an authority, a government body, a library, or a even school system. A book that has been banned is actually removed from a library or school system. The actual contextual reasons as to banning them is use of explicit violence, gore, sexuality, explicit language, religion, or dark times in history. On the non-contextual side of the reason why they are banned books are usually because with the best intentions to protect people, frequently children, from difficult philosophies and information. Teachers, or even more common adults, often censor books from

Finding the hostility of reading books is odd and peculiar but what if the world is full of people that feel inferior to those that know more than them or who have read a wider variation of books, and in that they simply decide that knowledge is not a power we need, nor literature. In a futuristic world where few people see meaning and potential one can find people like Clarisse McClellan to bring the light into people like Guy Montag's world and to see through the modern simulation of life without books filled with fast cars, loud music, and advertisements for distraction from a life eerie and sinister that lead deeper in discussion of religion and discrimination. The people of the city are ignorant to the knowledge, messages, and life lessons that the books they are burning hold. Those that read books are punished by having their house with all possessions burned at their feet and if not that then they are on the run with other renegades that crave the information stored in books.

People need to stand up for what they believe in and fight hard for it. In Fahrenheit 451 books are outlawed. Any person with books is evacuated from their home, and their books are burned in their house. The burning of books is a form of censorship by this book’s government because they are trying to limit people's knowledge.

At the present time, at least seventy-five books are being banned. This is hurting our culture more than it is helping. This has to be stopped; books cannot be taken off of the shelves at the rate that they are today. The books that are being taken off of the shelves are, for the most part, considered classics. The act of book banning puts limitations on what authors can say, and what readers can read (Dorshemer p.1). The banning of books in America is a violation of our first amendment rights. Amendment 1 of the United States Constitution states as follows:

It is ever present, always burning, maybe killing, maybe cleaning, maybe restoring in a society that has long forgotten what books were and are, and which, in fear for the loss of its current status, pronounced books as prohibited. In fact, without books, people won’t need to rethink things or philosophize about life, and in the event of transgression, fire is the antibiotic which can be used by firemen to kill the virus. Additionally, Ray Bradbury wrote Fahrenheit 451 not long after World War II, in which the Nazis resorted to burning books during Adolf Hitler regime. In fact, book burning has a long and dark history that represents an element of censorship (United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, n. pag.). Many readers may not recognize the relationship of this novel to the Holocaust, but it is a strong and rigid one because it focuses on the fact that fire is not just a symbol of a fiction novel, but it is a concrete reality that has affected many human beings in the past. For instance, in a symbolic act of ominous significance, on May 10, 1933, university students burned upwards of 25,000 volumes of “un-German” books, presaging an era of state censorship and control of culture (United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, n. pag.). With this last words, regardless of the position that readers may assume, the significance of Ray Bradbury’s novel and fire, along with all the symbols related to it,

The Harry Potter books by J.K. Rowling have been censored in many schools around the world for

In Ray Bradbury’s novel, Fahrenheit 451, Montag, a local firefighter, comes to the realization that the dystopic society he and Clarisse live in encourages book burning to keep the knowledge in the books a secret. Ray Bradbury was born on August 22, 1920 in a small town, Waukegan, just north of Chicago. When Bradbury was a young child he always loved to go to the library with his brother and stay there for hours. His aunt was also one of the first people to get him to find a love for reading and writing. Moreover, the themes found in his novels today are related to books his aunt exposed him to as a child. Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451, is known as his best work to this day. One of Fahrenheit 451’s main points is book burning and how it affected

As I read this passage it began to develop into one key idea that particularly spoke to me: groups were burning books to make a point. It seems that all the people that burned books, even in the far past, were of one race, religion, etcetera. Leaders typically want their group of followers to act in a specific which led to them wanting to find a way to instill certain morals into their heads. So they burn the books that had morals they didn’t want in their society. It was such a shocking event it almost forced people to support it. They simply wanted to erase all ideas in books that are controversial to their own. It shocked me at how Pastor Jones wanted to burn these books because he is a role model for the christian religion and he was tarnishing it by wanting to do this. Overall this passage provided me with the understanding that all groups of people have their own opinions, and sometimes they think the easiest option to get rid of the ideas they hate is to eradicate them.

When Heinrich Heine said “Where books are burned, in the end people will be burned”, he knew not of the atrocities that would come from the hatred of Jews in Germany, and eventually the Holocaust. Heine’s quote was in reference to the Spanish Inquisition and the mistreatment of Muslims and Jews, but Heine was acknowledging the bigger picture behind the burning of literature in relation to hatred of a group (Cole). Heine understood that books are representative of an entire culture and that those who are burning them, are purposefully trying to destroy the culture. He recognized that books can hold traditions, stories, and religious beliefs that are special to a race of people. Heine saw that books serve as a large part of a race’s identity,