preview

The Pros And Cons Of Immigrant Labor

Better Essays

would shrink the labor force by 11 million workers, reduce the real GDP by $1.6 trillion and take 20 years to complete (Trump has said he could do it in 18 months)” (The Street, November 1st, 2015).
"It will harm the U.S. economy," said Doug Holtz-Eakin, president of the American Action Forum and chief economic policy adviser to Sen. John McCain's 2008 presidential campaign. "Immigration is an enormous source of economic vitality." (The Street, November 1st, 2015). Some industries rely on cheap labor especially in agriculture, orange harvests in California rely on migrants from Mexico,” A number of industries that depend heavily on cheap immigrant labor would be devastated -- especially agriculture. "There would be an abrupt drop in farm income …show more content…

from Mexico “Remittances are a big part of workers’ lives, especially lower-skilled workers and a lot of families in Mexico rely on them. It’s big business; it’s billions of dollars,” said Audrey Singer, a senior fellow at the Brookings Metropolitan Policy Program. In an article written by Kathleen Hennessey for the LA Times “It’s not easily measured and it’s not easily regulated. Enforcing something like that would be nearly impossible.” (August, 17th, 2015). In an article for the Business Insider, Jacob Shamsian wrote “Such mass deportation would take 6.4% of US workers out of the country, according to the AAF report. With them would depart approximately $1.6 trillion in wages, spending, and other economic activity, more than the GDP of Texas. The agricultural industry would be disproportionately affected by the move — half of the US' farm workers in the past 15 years have been undocumented. These estimates don't take into account the approximately $15 billion that undocumented immigrants contribute to Social Security, according to Stephen Goss, chief actuary for the Social Security Administration”.(August 18th, 2015). The wall will run approximately 1900 miles and will cost billions to build. The topography is vast and in places completely unsuitable for building. The sheer logistical requirement is astounding. The technical expertise required, not to mention the amount and cost of labour, transport, raw materials, the building of roads and bridges to allow logistics to reach the various sites and the legal quagmire that such a proposal would generate, is mind boggling. Ali F. Rhuzkhan, a qualified construction engineer wrote in the National

Get Access