The Pros And Cons Of Internal Recruitment

This is beneficial to the business so you don’t spend time and money training new employees, meaning that those who are recruited internally are able to get on without needed any form of training that would be as time consuming in addition to the process being cost effective. Another benefit of internal recruitment is that there are opportunities for promotion, this means that it will motivate the employees to work harder which allows the business to run even more effectively. In addition to that, you know that by promoting that someone, they will be perfectly suited for the role in

External sources can also be beneficial if the company is looking for a fresh start or someone with some new ideas. External recruiting can help to diversify an organization while bringing in needed competencies. Hiring externally can be done through various ways such as Internet job boards, and staffing agencies. External hiring might be more costly but may provide more outstanding candidates. Whichever the organization decide internal or external, the position needed to be filled will determine the order of the search. Once you have started recruiting it is time to view your potential qualified candidates.

Situational leadership theory is when a leader adapt’s to the situation and the management styles to the behavioral needs of the individual or group. Trait approach leadership gives more credence to the qualities and traits that people are born with that make them natural born leaders.

According to Russell, K. (2016) internal recruitment is the process of find a suitable employees from exiting workforce of an organisation to carry out a new vacancy aroused in

External recruitment is when job vacancies is filled by a non-existing employee (a person from outside of the organisation).

One internal and two external ways that I could recruit for this role are through an internal

Recruiting inside the organisation has both pros and cons, some of the benefits would be knowing what the person is already capable of in the job and if they are open to learning new things, how well they do in their position already and how motivated they are towards their job. There are also negatives about recruiting from inside the work place, the employee could feel overly comfortable and friendly in the job and with their colleagues resulting in them not being motivated to do work.

Organizations can use internal recruitment and external recruitment activities to find the best employees for a position. Describe these two approaches and provide one advantage for using each approach. (4 Marks)

Situational leadership has very little in common with the other models mentioned herein. This model revolves around the leader changing leadership behaviors to meet the needs in relationship to the follower (Kouzes, 2003, p. 111). The difference between situational leadership and charismatic, servant, and transformational leadership is the lack of an organizational vision and the empowerment of the followers. Situational leadership uses followers based on their readiness level that relate to their ability and willingness to complete the task (Wren, 1995, p. 208). This aspect coupled with the leader’s task and relationship behavior is used in relation to the

The benefits of recruiting externally are that there will be more applicants to choose from which means these applicants may bring new ideas into the organisation which is a massive benefit as it can make developments to the company and make it better. Also when recruiting externally there’s potential for new skills to be brought into the organisation. However there are issues to recruiting externally such as taking a lot of time to advertise and also is very expensive. The person who has been appointed may not be as good as the company thought they would be meaning it would be waste of time.

Leadership can be defined as the process of influencing the activities of an individual or group towards goal achievement in any situation. Different leadership models focus on different aspects that can define how effective a leader can be in guiding the team or individual towards a goal. A support model was used to explore group or individual development based on situational leadership. The leadership support model was introduced

     The situational leadership model is based on certain assumptions. One of these assumptions is that there are different levels (or situations) in which a leadership style is played out. In the same way that there are four different levels of readiness on the part of staff or “followers”, there are also four leadership styles. On the whole it is the level that the followers are to be found that is most important element in the equation when a leadership style is seen to be to be the appropriate style and is chosen from among four possible styles. According to this idea leaders can choose to lead in

Situational Leadership is also called as Hersey-Blanchard Situational Leadership Theory. Paul Hersey the author of "Situational Leader" and Ken Blanchard the author of " The One Minute Manager" are the one who introduced this theory (Hersey-Blanchard Situational Leadership Theory, 2010-2015). The principle behind this theory is that every theory is not perfect in itself and the effectiveness of the theory is determined by the situation (Kreitner, 2013, p. 472). One of the important lesson that I have learned till this day is no one can be prepared for the upcoming problems. Problems may have same nature but may be different in the way it has to be solved. For instance: A Leader may motivate an employee by increasing salary but the same tactics may not work for another employee. Another employee may be seeking challenging job which may influence him/her to

Situational leadership, developed by professor Paul Hersey and author and consultant Ken Blanchard. Their approach was based off of a 1967 article by W.J. Reddin called The 3-D Management Style Theory. In his article, Reddin discusses the need to have different styles based on the demands of the leader. A leader needs to be flexible in their approach to meet the needs of the job, their superior and their subordinates (1967). Hersey and Blanchard progressed this theory by introducing the Situational Leadership II model. Their model breaks leadership into four different styles, and how a leader must alter their approach in supporting and directing their subordinates based on a given situation. These styles are directing (S1), coaching (S2), supporting (S3) and delegating (S4). The model also focuses on the development level of the subordinates by categorizing them between low (D1), moderate (D2 and D3) and

The situational leadership model was developed by two authors, Ken Blanchard, and Paul Hersey in the year 1969. These authors based this model on the concept that leadership should adapt to different management practices and approaches to fit different situations and surpass any diversity of their encounters (Lussier & Achua, 2010). In particular, this model provides guidance on how to analyze a situation, choose effaceable strategies and adopt the most appropriate leadership style. Apparently, the two developers of the model researched and found that, given some case, leadership may fail to accomplish some goals due to adopting single