The Pros And Cons Of Labeling Gmos

Have you ever heard what a GMO is? A GMO is a genetically modified organism, such of which is not labeled on items. Should GMOs be labeled? Some experts say that it should. They say that consumers buy products from companies, of which they trust to list the ingredients. However, most consumers are not informed of what GMO products are in their meals, or even what GMOs are.

A GMO is a genetically modified organism that goes through the process of genetic engineering. This is when genes of one organism are extracted, altered, and then artificially placed into another organism to then grow. We typically see GMOs in the food we consume every day. These foods include fruits and vegetables, however the most common organisms that are genetically engineered include, corn, soy, and cotton. It is ultimately the unnatural cross breeding of plants, animals, bacteria, and virus genes (Non-GMO Project). But now why is there a debate for placing a label to notify consumers of GMOs in their foods? Do we know the potential harm that GMOs can cause? We have the right to know what we are putting into our bodies and what is found in our everyday foods.

The Federal Government should require labeling of GMO’s on genetically modified foods. The people deserve to know what they put in their bodies. Some of the food is very unhealthy and some people are completely unaware of that fact. Many food companies do not put out all the information about what goes into the food in which we consume, if the Federal government were to require labeling of all GMO foods then the people could be well educated about what they put inside their bodies, and know if it is good for them or not. GMO stands for genetically modified foods, a genetically modified food is “..an organism whose genome has been altered by the techniques of genetic engineering so that its DNA contains one or more genes not normally found

Question 1: There are many contrasting viewpoints in relation to the labeling of food containing GMOs. This differing in opinion has brought significant attention to whether, or not, people deserve to know the origin of their food. The people that are against labeling, in particular, the FDA, have taken the position that labeling should only be required if, “the food has a nutritional or food safety property that is significantly different from what consumers would expect of the food (geneticliteracyproject.org).” They also argue that there is too much gray area when it comes to what exactly a “GMO” is. Food has been modified for years, in more ways than one. For example, cross breading, hybridization and mutagenesis. Another argument would be the domino effect. Once people get the green light to label foods that contain GMO’s, they will eventually want to know everything. The list of things we have “the right to know” will know no bounds. Questions such as were workers compensated properly or were the methods to grow environmentally friendly are just the beginning. Perhaps the most important argument against labeling foods with GMO’s, is the fact that despite what people think, GMO’s have been proven to be safe for human consumption. The reality is, is that all the major scientific institutions in the world have endorsed the safety of GMO technology (geneticliteracyproject.org.) There are, however, people who strongly disagree with these arguments and are in

The battle over whether food with GMOs should be labeled as such or not, continuez in The Battle Over GMOs by Alessandra Potenza illustrates what a GMO is and why they need to be labeled. First of all GMO stands for genetically modified organism, meaning GMOs are organisms that have been genetically modified to include a gene from another species to produce a certain trait. The reason that some people are very upset at the whole GMO thing is because some companies that include GMOs in their products are refusing to label the fact that they use GMOs. Outrage has sparked everywhere over this and people are demanding that companies using GMOs in their products must label them. The companies on the other hand are claiming that they have a right to privacy and are claiming that the FDA, which stands for Food and Drug Administration, have approved the GMO usage in their products.. This reader believes that we the people have a right to know what is in our food and decide if we still want to consume it.

The debate over genetically modified foods continues to haunt producers and consumers alike. Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are foods that have been modified through bioengineering to possess certain characteristics. These plants have been modified in the laboratory to enhance traits such as increased resistance to herbicides or increased nutritional content (Whitman, 2000). The debate continues to grow as to whether these genetically altered foodstuffs are the answer to hunger in the coming years, or whether we are simply children playing with something that we do not have the capacity to understand. One of the biggest debates in the GMO issue is whether producers need to use labeling of

The advancement of technology has allowed our generation to genetically modify food for what is believed to be beneficial to consumers. The environmental and health effects of genetically modified foods have generated controversy about whether these foods are safe. With such advances, the use of genetically modified food is expanding, even though they 're unlabeled. Genetically modified foods should be labeled because of the possible health, environmental, and economic risks. Once a consumer knows what they are paying for, it is fair to produce and market such foods.

Writer, Michael specter who has been awarded the Global Health Council's annual Excellence award twice spend his time writing about developing issues such as agricultural biotechnology, before he served as the national science reporter. Specter claims that there is no need for GMO labels and it does not make “scientific sense”(Specter. Par. 6) to include them on food products. Specter main concern is just because food companies are adding GMO labels to the product does not give the consumer enough information about what the actual ingredients are. “They would tell you how your food is put together, but not what it contains. How could that help anyone make a sound decision about his health”(Specter. Par. 6)? The public is getting more curious

Do you find the labels on your favorite snacks to be helpful to most consumers? Many would answer this question yes, and argue that labels contain important information that all buyers should know for health or safety reasons. While this is true, this argument should not apply to GMO labeling. GMOs, of genetically modified organisms, are foods with altered genes from biotechnological techniques. They are used to help foods to be preserved, or prevent certain pests from eating or infecting them, or even to have other desired and beneficial traits. While many may disagree, including use of these GMOs on food labels is completely ineffective. They make GMOs appear to be foreign and dangerous. There are already organic foods for those who are suspicious of genetically altered foods that cause harm. These labels would also make buyers spend more money down the road. A bill to label GMOs would cause multiple issues for producers and buyers everywhere.

One of the many reasons why GMOs should be labeled is that the organism has been modified past its original self. They are not the same organism that was originally produced, and they were genetically engineered. The product should state that it has been altered. Another reason GMOs should be labeled is that it helps people make decisions about what they put into their bodies. With these herbicide resistant crops, the crop can come into contact with herbicide, which can harm the people, but with non-herbicide resistant crops the farmers have to be more careful where they spread the herbicide.

An interest statement: I think this topic will keep me engaged because I did my last essay on the use of GMOs and now I am curious to see why people are opposed to the labeling of them and how they will impact the farmers if the labeling laws pass in certain states. I know families typically prefer organic food, however, it appears that this is the case because the word “organic” sounds pleasing. Most people seem very uneducated on what GMOs really are and just assume from the media that they are horrible technological advances. This topic seems like a very current issue which will allow me to find an abundance of useful information.

The article reviews that, Vermont's GMO labeling became a law. Thus Vermont wants other states to support their way to go. The usefulness of this article is that it demonstrates how Vermont is changing their way of living in a good way and want others do to the same. The bias for this source is for GMO labeling. Information that this source gives me to put into my article is showing Vermont's accomplishment and show the positively you can get from it with just GMO- labeling. I will use this source to show the good outcomes with just switching to GMO- labeling.

Just like every other issue, there is more than one side to this one as well. Many people like the idea of labeling food packages. The Washington House of Representatives voted to pass a bill in April 2015 which does not make labeling GMO, or genetically modified organisms, products mandatory, according to CBS News and naturally many people were upset by this decision (House votes to block mandatory GMO labeling). Vermont 's democratic representative Peter Welch asked "What 's the problem with letting consumers know what they are buying?" To answer his question, the problem here is that there is a

Some of the arguments for labeling GM foods are to prevent food allergens. An example of this would be on products containing protein that require label, since it may contain allergens that the regular product might not contain. Some of the arguments against labeling GM foods is the idea that people will stop consuming them due to the belief they endanger their health. The main concern about labeling is the misunderstanding and misinterpretation of GMO foods opening discussions and turning consumers off from the products (Kling,2014), creating concerns and opening questions among people. I personally think that natural will be healthier for our bodies. We are living in an era where time is precious. We are living in such a rush that we are

​Nowadays the majority of the foods that we eat contain genetically modified ingredients (GMO's). People who consume these foods think they are eating healthy but lack knowledge of what really is inside these foods. Consumers should have the right to know everything that's inside the food they're eating. Labeling Genetically Modified Foods is common sense, it should be presented to us just like we have calorie and cholesterol counters on the back of our food. Along with organic farmers, environmental groups, and other consumers, I believe that we should be aware of what foods that are Genetically Engineered by labeling them.