The most important thing that a law enforcement officer can do is the right thing. We as officers of the law are suppose to be role models. I have been in law enforcement of almost two years and I have never accepted free stuff from any restaurant or local business. I my self-have always taken my top shirt of or just changed my clothes completely. I do not think that I should get any special treatment from anyone just because I am an officer and what I was sworn to do. So I would like to talk about the pros and cons of officers accepting free meals and coffee, not accepting free meals, higher standards, officers getting sued or the department getting sued, and civil liability. Gratuity is a discount or a gift / benefit. Gratuities should be not all the time but sometimes. An officer off duty should never take gratuities because he or she is off duty and if he or she is not in uniform then it is really wrong. An officer that is on duty should be no different. All thought, you are not going to argue with the manager or the business owner. Accepting free meals is unethical if the officer thinks that the meal is already paid for or free. When it is acceptable and ethical, an officer should at least attempt to pay for his or her meal. When an officer is given a free meal, he or she should just put money on the table as a tip. When officer receives a free lunch, he or she is not able to get sued over the act, but in order for an officer or the department to get sued, is if the
There are many key issues that have to be considered by law enforcement agencies when building relationships with the communities they serve. First and for most they have to adequately and fairly address complaints made by members of the community. The police have to provide the same service to minority communities as they would provide a predominately white community. The effect of providing good service could mean that the community will slowly build their trust with police officers. In the long run this will reduce tensions and build trust between the two groups. By building trust the police know they can count on the community when it comes to crime prevention. Reducing the publics fear of crime translates to increased cooperation between
One of the most common gratuities offered to police officers are free meals or meals at a discounted price. This often produces multiple consequences that can result in negative perceptions from the restaurant owner as he or she may expect extra attention to his or her business as a
Gratuity Something given voluntarily or beyond obligation usually for some service. (Dictionary, 2010) When does a cup of coffee become a gratuity for a police officer? What is acceptable and what is not acceptable? If a police officer takes a free cup of coffee or a half priced meal does that make him vulnerable to take more. Does that act make the officer a bad officer or a corrupt officer? Does the person giving the gratuity expect something in return or is it just a gesture for the work the officer is doing?
The criminal justice system is a used to protect our society from those who try to harm it. Departments such as courts, and police officers study the behavior of criminals; they want our communities to be safe. When a crime is committed these departments work together to protect the rights of our society and our own. As stated in the textbook, a crime is the “Conduct in violation of the criminal laws of a state, the federal government, or a local jurisdiction for which there is no legally acceptable justification or excuse” (Schmalleger). Our system is a balanced system, there are times where have to think about our own rights as one person, but there are also times where we have to include other people. We must think of our society and
The criminal justice system has been proven to play a very important role in society. The criminal justice system is used to keep the citizens in check and to make sure that the laws that are made are being followed. It also is there to penalize anyone who disobeys the laws. In the criminal justice system, there are 3 main parts, law enforcement, adjudication, and corrections. Law enforcement is self-explainable. It consists of the law enforcers such as police officers and sheriffs. Adjudication is made up of people in the court house such as judges and lawyers. Corrections is made up of jailhouse matters such as prison officials. In these many components of the criminal justice system, there are all put in place to help correct people to do the right thing. There are punitive efforts and rehabilitative efforts. At time, the system may lean towards one category or more, which can be dangerous in terms of disciplinary action. The criminal justice system is more punitive than rehabilitative which makes the system ineffective.
Law Enforcement officers have one of the most critical jobs in the United States. Their lives are always on the line and they are of high regards. This means they cannot fail! The results of their jobs do not only depend on their actions but also on the people. What this means is the community has a huge role when it comes to solving crime. Though many people may not believe it, they are the key to a successful crime prevention community. The people of the United States don’t really understand both the positive and negative effects that community policing actually brings. Some may say it is very dangerous based on their experiences. Others may say it’s the best way to do away with crime. Today the two will be compared and put to test by true officers serving our country. The facts will be stated and questions will be answered. Let’s take a look at what community policing is really all about!
In chapter 4, the textbook discusses the Criminal justice system and how the system works. The criminal justice system is a system setup to punish those accused of criminal offenses. Crimes such as murder, rape, robbery or crimes that are considered felonies. Many people are found guilty of their crimes and others are found innocent. People find this a good system to properly punish those who have committed offenses. I disagree that the system is a good system that helps people. The reason for me disagreeing is that the system is not perfect. There have been cases where the jury has come to a verdict that was wrong. Cases where the jury wrongly incarcerated somebody or cases where the jury acquitted somebody when they were guilty. A system
It at times has been taken advantage of, when the officer's started using this for after work hours and taking home food for their families. These actions were clearly unethical behavior. While establishments are attempting to show respect and generosity to officer's, some may become offended when the offer is not accepted. It would be a "catch 22", due to the fact they are offering this as generosity, and in the event of needing a favor, would not mind calling this to the officer's attention and hold the free items against
People often wonder why does the criminal justice (CJ) system fail to rehabilitate the inmates before they are released from prison, after all isn’t that part of the process? Isn’t it a mandatory that the inmates participate in this rehabilitation process? Inmates are often released before their sentenced in completed and this can leave the victim and family with a feeling of betrayal from the justice system, they should serve more time, after all they stole my property and my money. This feeling of needing a longer sentence for the crime that was committed is excessive, especially when the crime value may be minimal and wanting the inmate to serve seven to ten years incarcerated in excessive.
Obama once said, “ we need to keep making our streets safer and our criminal justice farrier- our homeland more secure, our world more peaceful and sustainable for the next generation.” The world needs people that are willing to make it a safe environment to make sure to try and stop all the crimes out in the streets and the drugs being influenced out their. A Criminal justice career can have many advantages, even though it has its disadvantages, its problem trying to join in.
“The judicial system of the United States is unique in so far as it is actually made up of two different court systems, the Federal Court System and the State Court System”. ( United States Courts).
As society changes, our legal system evolves with it. Prior to the Criminal Justice Act 2003, the principle of double jeopardy meant that a person couldn’t be tried a second time. This act amended this principle, allowing serious crimes, such as murders, to be re tried if some new evidence became available.We will be asking ourselves if these amendments has greatly improved our system of justice, by focusing on why these amendments were made and whether the advantages of such a reform prevail on the disadvantages.
Would the officer getting the free steak dinner do the right thing and arrest the owner? Probably not, because he feels obligated to look the other way due to him taking the free dinner once a week. According to text “Lawrence W. Sherman of the Crime Control Institute offered a hypothetical moral decline, beginning with the accept- ance of minor perks, such as the free cup of coffee, which leads to compla- cency about accepting a free drink after hours from a bartender, to bribes for traffic violations, then to money from gamblers and prostitutes, and finally to graft from narcotics” (Delattre, 2011). Police corruption is a particular practice of police misconduct intended to gain financial benefits, other private gain, or career progress. One form of police corruption is begging for or accommodating bribes in exchange for not broadcasting drug and prostitution rings or other unlawful actions. One other instance is police officers disobeying the laws code of conduct in order to protect the
With the issue of the officers not returning to the business because the gratuities have stopped is an ethical issue that the officers are going to have to address because the free meal and coffee was inappropriate gifts (Pollack, 2017). Also, when the officers accepted the gratuities that they should not have been receiving in the first place they would effectively be condoning and even collaborating in theft because as the waiter I did not have the authorization to give the gratuities (Coleman, 2004, 41).
There are many different professional and ethical standards that should be considered when discounting uniformed police officers. For example, when Ari the deli owner told the officer his payment is not necessary when the officer ordered a sandwich, the police officer would need to report this information to his superior officer. “Officers shall report any unsolicited gifts, gratuities or other items of value that they receive and shall provide a full report of the circumstances of their receipt if directed.” (Statter,