The Pros And Cons Of Lowering The Drinking Age

There have been arguments, more so now than before, about lowering the legal drinking age from 21 to 18 years of age. Realistically, to do so would be unideal. From 1609 when the first colonist arrived in Jamestown in 1919, in the United States of America there were no age restrictions on alcohol consumption or purchase. Prior to Prohibition drinking laws varied by state, and there was no national law in concerns to a drinking age. Most states had no laws establishing a legal drinking age. In 1920, the 18th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was ratified, making the sale and consumption of alcohol in the United States illegal. When Prohibition ended in 1930 the legal drinking age was 18 until 1984, when Congress passed the National Minimum Drinking Age Act, it forced states to alter their age requirements to legally buy and possess alcohol. The National Minimum Drinking Age Act raised the age limit from 18 to 21 by October of 1986. If states failed to do so, they would lose 10% of their federal highway funding. The goal of the act was achieved by October 1986, which still stand until today. Yet, there are arguments over lowering the drinking age back to 18. To lower the drinking age to 18 would be a defective idea for numerous reasons. The age limit should remain at 21 because all things that can kill you must have restrictions, 18, 19, and 20 year old’s brains are not fully developed, and because it would be in the best for the public interest.

Drinking alcohol has been a very controversial activity in America for as long as many can remember. Back in 1919 to 1933 there was a period of prohibition where the manufacturing and selling of alcohol was completely banned, but they realized that banning alcohol wasn’t the answer to the problems they faced. In fact, today many believe that anyone under the age of 21 is prohibited from drinking alcohol, but that’s not the case. Underage drinking is allowed in 29 states if done on private property with parental consent, 25 states allow drinking for religious reasons, and 11 states allow it for educational purposes (“Drinking Age”). Another misconception is that the minimum drinking age was always 21 in the U.S. Surprisingly, between 1970 and 1976, 30 states lowered their minimum legal drinking age from 21 to 18, 19, or 20. This raises the question, what should the legal drinking age actually be? Is 21 unnecessarily old? This house believes the drinking age should be lowered from 21 to 18 because 18 year olds are legal adults, higher drinking ages make alcohol and drugs attractive to minors, and people need to learn safe drinking habits from a young age.

Many states already allow some alcohol Consumption under age. Even though the legal drinking age is 21. Eighteen is the legal age of adulthood and adults should make their own decisions about alcohol consumption, if they can make other grown up decisions. Most people think that lowering the drinking age will cause more car accidents. In reality a lower minimum legal drinking age does not Protect America from traffic accidents. Alcohol consumption can be a good or bad thing when it comes to lowering it . Should the drinking age in America at least be lowered to 18.

It’s the big 18; as an official adult one can go out and vote for the country’s next president, one can become a real patriot and fight for the country they love, one can even purchase tobacco that they have been dying to try. These are just some of the benefits as a legal adult so why is it that in the United States it is still illegal to drink under the age of 21? Consuming alcohol is a right and just like any other right there are consequences that one must endure for abusing them. Lowering the drinking age has always been a controversial debate, on one hand with a stricter drinking requirement than majority of the world America is taking the precaution to keep their citizens out of harm’s way. But on other hand, even though America has

For years, underage drinking is perhaps one of the most controversial topics of our generation. Why do our young people disobey this law? Are they lost? Who will answer the call of the lost? Having the age to drink legally at the age of 21 may seem like it would never be disobeyed; however, over time, underage drinking has become more and more prevalent. In today’s society, a few choice young people have grown to control the desire to break the law to consume alcohol while at the appropriate age. However, not all teenagers inhabit a sense of self-control. The problem lies within the difference the effects of lowering the drinking age to 18 or keeping the age of 21 can be. With much speculation, this particular topic has become a very intriguing argument that does indeed stir up controversy. What people must understand is that the democracy should not decrease the legal drinking age because it can increase drunk driving arrests, it will cause young people to become academically challenged, it can cause health complications and diseases at a younger age, and it can promote criminal and violent activity.

More than half of American youth of age twelve to twenty have tried alcohol. In the United States, the legal drinking age is twenty-one. Austria legal drinking age for beer and wine is sixteen years old. In Saudi Arabia drinking or possessing alcohol is illegal, and people who drink or possess alcohol are subject to arrest and trial. The problematic argument is whether to lower the legal age of drinking alcohol. And some question this motive because underage and binge drinking have multiple risk factors- that can lead to car accidents, violent behavior, alcohol poisoning, and other health problems. The legal age of drinking has justified because of factors affecting the risk of developing a drinking problem at a young age. Potential targets

The article from Jay Evensen oppose the idea of lowering the age-limit for drinking to 18. He oppose the idea because he believe that by lowering the drinking age, there will be an increase in mortality for the youth (which in this case below 21). He believes that it is true that the 21-years-old drinking age creates lots of binge drinking activities, but it is not the solution to lower the drinking age because the cost that might happened will be even worse. He stated that “there really is no logical connection between being old enough to qualify as a fit and effective soldier and making mature drinking decisions. Rental car companies understand this, which is why they generally don’t trust their cars to anyone under 25”.

Would raising the legal drinking age to twenty-five years benefit our country from hurting the youth? If a twenty-one-year-old can join the military and can help defend the country, then why not keep the legal drinking age there? The drinking age should not be raised to age twenty-five. There are many important reasons that should be considered first. There are some reasons why; you are a legal adult at twenty-one, most people at the age are already out from under their parents, and maybe even in their third year of college living on their own.

Eighteen should be the legal age of adults in United States for using alcohol. There are three reasons to support this contention. First of all, the development of people’s brain will not be completed until people become 25 years old. Therefore, although drinking alcohol may cause some affects the brain, there is no evidence of huge brain destruction, alcohol dependency, or alcohol misuse, which the experts tell us will be the undeniable result of the lowering the age in the United States. Moreover, the prohibition should not be imposed on young people because using alcohol is belong to a person’s consciousness, nor it is belong to an behavior. Second, there are fewer traffic accidents by drunk drivers in many nations with Minimum Legal Drinking Age of 18 (MLDA) than in The United States. In fact, many traffic accidents from driving do not come from drinking, they come from other reasons, which are speeding, distracted driving, and traffic occurrences. In addition, some States denied the lowering minimum drinking age because they will not have ten percents traffic funding from the government, so this purpose is not unfair for people who turn in to eighteen. As shown above, lowering minimum drinking age should be considered explicitly. Last, law of government allows people to go to the army at eighteen because they can sacrifice for their country. In fact, that young people are risking their life with other agents more dangerous than alcohol agents. People who are attending

The minimum drinking age should be raised because younger people tend to make more irresponsible decisions, many DUI's that occur involve people in their twenties, and drinking and driving causes more traffic accidents than anything else.

For my persuasive essay, I wrote about lowering the legal drinking age. I wrote about this topic because it is very controversial and is a popular subject. The essay was quite challenging because I was fighting it and a lot of the reliable information, such as statistics, were going against my opinion. In my paper I think I did a good job of finding a fair compromise between the two sides by using what I researched to point out the pros and cons and coming to a solution. Although I took the side of lowering the legal drinking age, I have explained why people believe it shouldn’t be changed.

Drinking has become a part of every “young adult's” life. It has even taken a toll some. Turning 21 is something that every person is waiting on. You can buy your own alcohol but the main point is are you mature enough, can you control your alcohol can you afford all the risk that comes with it? Just because you turn 21 does not mean you should be able to buy your own alcohol. Increasing the age to buy alcohol should be in consideration and here is why.

So, where do you fit in? Are you pro or con for lowering or keep the legal age at 21? Many factor can change your opinion on the subject from the actually age you had your first drink to if you heavy drinker but one fact remains. Alcohol is not to taking lightly. It can be the beginning of good time but the end to a bad time. Most people are not ready to handle the responsible of drinking. Responsible is of major factor when deciding to drink. I strongly believe that young adult are ready to handle the responsible of drink till they are legal age and even they maybe not. Many study show how dramatic how fragile the young mind is and how alcohol can change a person perceive. Their decision can long term affect at their young age.

Minimum Legal Drinking Age (MLDA) laws are defined as the legal age when an individual can purchase and publicly consume alcoholic beverages. The MLDA in the United States is currently 21 years and this has sparked quite a bit of controversy about lowering or even raising the MLDA.  However, prior to the law being passed ,the National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984, the legal age when alcohol could be purchased varied from state to state.

John McCardell proposes a compromise to the consuming age. Think concerning when you take drivers education. You don’t cross out of being clueless about getting your license as well as riding alone. If you did force out of doors the policies, you would certainly lose the privilege of a driving force’s license. The equal issue might be carried out with the privilege of ingesting. As Sarah Baldauf certainly explains, “decriminalizing drinking via youngsters 18 and older…will convey their alcohol intake out from hiding to wherein parents and also adults might screen it as well as educate duty without war” (Baldouf, 2007). Allowing eighteen yr olds to attain a license to drink would do a few effective things. First, it would make drinking less “cool” to age’s eighteen-twenty, and would certainly reduce the long wait if you want to drink legally. It would also deter humans under age eighteen from consuming due to the fact this license may be taken from minors for breaking the guidelines (Baldouf, 2007). If a minor ever were given stuck drinking under eighteen or without their license, they would then lose their eligibility to acquire this 3-yr license. The option to acquire this license or permit would certainly be the selection of the eighteen 12 months antique; no longer a responsibility. McCardell indicates that as a way to be eligible to acquire this license, the teen would certainly need to pass by means of an academic application at the make use of and also dangers of