The Pros And Cons Of Natural Selection

In social psychology when nature or nurture is mentioned this always brings up arguments and debates. It said to be dated back to Victorian era and it’s a never ending battle (Maribeth Mabanag).They argued that one of either nature or nurture was responsible for how human turned out in life. This is something no scientists have been able to prove up to these modern times. Nature is said to be things that you are acquired your from parents and you are born with such as this like you eye colour, hair texture and your nose. It is said that whatever you are born with is responsible for how you develop in life. When they speak of nurture, this deal with the effect of the environment and how it helps develop a child’s life. However, certain human traits remain a biological mystery. These traits have been studied on the "outside" but whose "inside" origins remain unclear. Such "mysterious" traits can be anything like intelligence, athletic ability, skin tone and muscle mass. So all the assumptions and

Natural selection is the process in which heritable traits that make it more likely for organisms to survive and successfully reproduce become more common in a population over successive generations. Each of us individuals is specifically shaped and formed by our own genetic pattern. We inherit this pattern half from are mother and half from are father. The cause of this is the proximate cause that led it’s phenotype to ultimate causes. Much of we know today about evolution derives from the late great pioneer, Charles Darwin. Charles Darwin was an english naturalist that even from an early age was very interested in outdoor pursuits. Early in his prep career his father tried sending him to the University of Edinburg to pursue his medical

In the process of natural selection, individuals that have certain inherited traits tend to survive and

For more than 150 years, a revolutionary idea has been spreading all over the world. It helped us discover our origins and revealed our place in nature. It led to the unification of once independent fields of scientific inquiry. And it is being used today to tackle some of the most pressing problems facing modern civilization. But its implications go far beyond science. It has shaped our culture, politics, philosophy and religion, and it has been used to justify war and genocide. That idea is Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection.

The belief that various living organisms emerged from previous organisms throughout the history of the earth can be associated with the term evolution. One can therefore assume that there is a vast likelihood that prehistoric evolutionary processes have a significant impact on human behavior today. This paper hypothesizes that the human mind has information-processing mechanisms that are known as adaptions which have developed over time. It is believed that these adaptions were formed by natural selection in ancestral surroundings and have specialised functions that shape behaviour to allow one to solve specific adaptive challenges. Thus evolutionary psychologists suggest that individuals have what Jerome H. Barkow, Leda Cosmides, and John

As well as this, certain blood proteins are found in a number of species. When genetic code (DNA and RNA) is used by a cell, it builds amino acids in a sequence, which forms protein. Chemical tests can determine whether one species has the similar blood proteins to another, thus showing evidence of evolutionary relationships. Organisms with a common ancestor have a close number of amino acid sequences in common. For example, chimpanzees and humans have no difference in their amino acid protein count in their haemoglobin – evidence for a common ancestor.

Evolutionary biology has always interested me, specifically the mechanisms of natural selection and how species adapt to their environment. It started with my love for animals and nature when I was little. I spent my summers working with horses at a local corral, where I would ride around the surrounding wilderness areas. My favorite part about riding in the mountains was watching the change in plant and animal species as the elevation changed. It never ceased to amaze me how the alpine tree line was always so sudden. Humongous pine trees would give way to the short, shrubby plants of the alpine tundra so uniformly and noticeably. I have always wondered about the environmental conditions that cause species to distribute themselves in

The thought that all organisms are perfect after evolution is a common misconception among many individuals. Natural selection does aid in improving the relationship between the environment and organisms yet it does not reconstruct an organism to perfectly suit the environment. Instead, organisms follow a specific process of descent of modification. Descent of modification, one of Darwin's supporting ideas for evolution, states that all offspring inherit traits through their parents by the process of heredity. Therefore, in organisms there is the base of their parents and through selection pressures certain variations will better adapt to the environment. Since there is still an existing form of the parent and the adaptations, the organism will not be perfectly adapted to the environment.

Space and time are linked, stars, worlds, and people are born, grow up, and die. Human beings live about 70-80 years, but the lifetime of the sun is 100 millions longer. Matter is older than life. Millions of years before the Earth was formed, atoms were synthesized inside the stars, and where thrown back out to space when they exploded. From this stellar remains appeared many planets; the Earth, and all living beings are formed from star’s dust, but from our human thinking, evolution has been really slow, from the molecules from the primitive oceans, up until the first bacteria. The reason why evolution is not the same for everyone is because is because it advances really slowly and lasts a long time. Why is it that if human beings who live 75

It is almost undeniable that the technologies cause rapid changes in human relationships, cultures, and societies. While it enormously facilitates us in nearly every aspect of our life, such changes also create consequences that we do not yet realize. Almost all of us know Darwinism and Natural Selection in the biological field, but we often overlook the similar phenomena in the social aspect. In fact, resemble to the way we adapt to our physical environment, we also adapt to our social environment in order to survive and excel in our social relationships. Such adaption is called Social Darwinism. Because technologies have significantly influenced our social environment, humans are forced to adapt not only to technologies, but also to the

In topic 1, the introduction to human uniqueness and social coercion theory, we are introduced to some of the common misinterpretation behind Charles’ Darwin’s theory of evolution, specifically in regards to natural selection and survival of the fittest. One of the biggest contributors to this issue is the lack of exposure to the general public on the overall theory behind these two processes. Instead of a full detailed explanation about natural selection and survival of the fittest, we are just told that it is slow and that to be fit means a level of superiority among competition, respectively. Topic 1 revealed that this is not true, as well as stating that natural selection is about individual risk, benefit and cost is of the utmost importance(Bingham). Based on this newly found insight from the course, how does individual risk, benefit, and cost play such an important role in natural selection even though selection is seen in a population and not a

This question ties with what was mentioned earlier that nature does not identify problems or feautures that make oranisms succesfful but instead natural selection responds to phenotypic variation in a population. Artificial selection doesnt have a direct natural correlation to the phenotypic variation but instead its based on what humans decide to consume/buy etc, doesnt necessarily have to be the best thing for them.

In our world today, there are many different philosophical perspectives regarding human nature that influence the way we think, act, and live. From religious traditions to theories that are widely acclaimed, they all offer people guidance so that they can live a happy life. One of the most famous theories that have been widely debated about is Darwinism which encompasses three theories on the evolution of species. Darwinism provides a perspective on humanity’s role in the universe, the core assumptions that form the perspective, the problem on why many people are unfulfilled, the solution to the unhappiness, and the significance of compassion through the theories of evolution.

GMO stands for Genetically Modified Organism, which is the process of extracting genes from one species into another unrelated species. The process of transferring DNA from two distinct species is through genetic engineering. This displays the new traits of the first donor, which will be part of the genetic make up of the recipient organism. GMO is different from cross breeding or hybridization. Scientists developed GM plants by introducing genes that kill insects and protect crops against viruses. Many of these GM plants require less water so that they are able to grow in areas where water is scarce. The benefit of GMOs help crops grows and ripens faster so that farmers are able to grow more crops throughout the year. On the other hand, GMOs may be harmful to humans if they are not washed and cleaned properly before eating. GMOs include high risk of allergens, toxins, and other unknown side effects that are harmful.

“Eugenics” --- the Greek equivalent of “good birth”, was a scientific term coined by Sir Francis Galton in the 18th century. He believed that all human traits were inherited. Eugenics was promoted as a set of beliefs and practices that would genetically improve the human race through selective breeding. “Positive” eugenics encouraged the breeding of “socially desirable” genes while “negative” eugenics would improve the society by hindering the reproduction of individuals who possessed “defective” traits.