The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Power Plants

There are many different opinions on whether we should continue to create nuclear energy or we should stop it. Some of the positive aspects are there has been no fatalities at nuclear power plants. Another one is nuclear power plants generate 20% of today power. Also nuclear energy is a clean power source with no pollution. Some negative aspects are creating these plants cost a lot of money. Another problem is we are running out of places to store waste. The waste puts off nuclear radiation

Imagine a world in which millions of people are wiped out within minutes due to men’s desire to put their materalistic desires before the well being of others: this is the dangerious path we’ll be undertaking if nuclear energy is used to fill the void left if coal and gas were not available. There should be steps taken to make it unlawful to construct additional nuclear power plants in the United States because these power plants are extremely dangerious to our environment and people; it’s also unclear how radiation exposure can effect people in the long-term; and there are other sources of energy that are available, such as solar energy.

The use of nuclear power is risky, costly, and dangerous. The chances of having it leak are great, and if it ever does manage to leak somehow, it will take millions to clean up the mess. Nuclear power plants are also expensive to maintain and build. The money that goes to building nuclear plants only to have them taken down again could go to greater causes, such as funding other sources of renewable energy. For example, solar power, wind power, geothermal power, hybrid and electric cars, and aggressive energy efficiency are climate solutions that are safer, cheaper, faster, more secure, and less wasteful than nuclear power (“Ten Strikes Against Nuclear Power.” Green America.). Overall, the cons of building and using nuclear power (plants) outweigh

TMI has provided electricity since 1979. The Exelon Corporation might shut down the plant. There are many pros to nuclear power and many cons. I think we should keep the plant open. Here’s why, if we close the plant, employees will lose their jobs. Also, nuclear energy is clean energy. If we close TMI down, then it would take years to build a new kind of energy source.

At this point, it may seem like nuclear power is just a slightly more dangerous method of producing electricity than a more commonly used method like coal-burning. However, environmental impact and efficiency are the areas where nuclear power shines the brightest. Feiveson (2009), a self-titled skeptic of nuclear power, wrote, “Compared to coal-generated electricity in particular, it [nuclear power] is relatively clean, producing almost no emissions” (p. 60). Because turning water into steam is the main method of producing electricity with nuclear power, it is apparent why nuclear power plants do not release very many toxins into the environment. Harrison, Hester, & Walls (2011) stated that during the normal functioning of a nuclear power

The only two nuclear weapons ever used in history killed an estimated 226,000 people.These two bombs are a prime example of the fact that nuclear power is dangerous and should not be handled carelessly.Not only are nuclear weapons dangerous,but nuclear power plants and reactors are also a threat to the human race.Nuclear power provides about 11 percent of the world’s electricity every year which means we can not completely get rid of it due to the amount of energy it produces.On the other hand nuclear weapons are dangerous and do not help the human race in any way therefore they should all be destroyed and never used again.Not only will nuclear weapons eventually wipe out the human race,but there are also huge effects to the environment that

Much of the public is weary of nuclear energy because of past events, though they know very little about how it works or the safety measures that accompany it. A large power plant and the knowledge that one just like it melted down causing mass panic across the globe is enough to put any person on edge. Instead of scrapping the idea of nuclear power all together, researchers have come up with safer and smaller reactors that should be able to calm the public’s worries. Nuclear power has too many benefits to give up on the idea fully. Large nuclear plants are where many of the fears about nuclear energy have stemmed; new advancements and technologies, however, have emerged that could quell many of the concerns of the public. Small modular reactors

Where I stand on the topic is in the middle but slightly to the negative side. While I agree that nuclear power is a better alternative to coal, and oil which are more radioactive than nuclear waste, and kill thousands of people every year, I think that it still isn’t good enough. The people of Earth can’t make a switch to something that won’t prevent the destruction of an entire species. I say that if anything nuclear power should be a temporary switch until we can find something better. There are a few problems with nuclear power being temporary however, it’s expensive, it’s risky, and people don’t like change.

Nuclear power plants are one of the main ways to gather energy, but is it the best and safest way and cleanest way to get energy? Abe gilbert says, “For now I will simply state that Nuclear Energy can never be clean or safe. Look at the hundreds of thousands of cubic tons of nuclear waste that we have no safe place to store.”(Abe Gilbert 4).Nuclear power plants are not, despite of what other people say, the cleanest and safest way to get energy. Nuclear plants are harmful to the environment, are not as durable (long lasting) as other ways of getting energy, and they become potential targets for terrorist who want to destroy the United States. People may argue that nuclear power plants are clean and are safe, but are

Nuclear power has the highest efficiency rate of any of the other power sources, 92.2% of the power made is used. Although there is still a chance of failure there is such a small chance and compared to other power sources such as coal it is much safer. Like I stated above coal burning causes over 10,000 deaths per that is not even remotely close to the amount of deaths that nuclear power plants cause. Nuclear power plants aren't as bad as they are portrayed. You only see the bad that they cause, not the good that they do. Nuclear power is the way to

Increasing the use of Nuclear Power in the U.S is a necessary step for this country. The use of Nuclear power would substantially lower environmental pollution by diminishing the amount of greenhouse gas emissions from popular and harmful fossil fuel energy sources such as coal, crude oil and natural gas. Some argue that the use of Nuclear power is too dangerous, but evidence shows that it is a safe way and efficient way to extract energy without disrupting our earth. Another argument against the use of Nuclear Power is the handling of the nuclear waste. In reality, ninety-six percent of the nuclear waste can be recycled and the amount of nuclear waste is a minuscule amount compared to the impact of fossil fuels. Nuclear power is a safe, environmentally friendly and effective way to obtain energy.

For many decades, Nuclear Power Plants have become a growing argument between the educated and uneducated. Some have grown towards the growth of these plants for their technological innovations and environmental benefits. Others have walked away from the deal, repeatedly exclaiming the risks and money that builds up over time. Though these problems remain open for everyone to see, those arguments are outdated and overstated. In addition, there are far more positives than the eyes can see, the negatives, however, are an eyesore. Nuclear power plants will benefit towns for the strict safety standards, the pricing of a nuclear power plant, promotional factors, and land requirements.

It is no doubt that Nuclear is very powerful and that it can cause some good things to happen but we can not ignore the horrible things that it has done to our planet and ecosystem. There are two sides to this argument if we should close nuclear power plants or we shouldn't in my personal opinion I think that we should close these plants. But before I had to make my decision I had to do some research on both sides so here is what I found.

As of today, eighty-one percent of the United States energy demand is supplied by fossil fuels. Fossil Fuels, like petroleum (oil) and coal, are organic compounds found in the Earth’s crust. They are created from the remains of plants and animals that lived millions of years ago and are used in the form of concentrated biomass. Coal was the first widespread fuel, but eventually alternative ways of making energy without the pollution to the Earth’s atmosphere and surface were found. One of the most influential alternatives is nuclear energy. Believe it or not, one lb of nuclear fuel-enriched uranium contains the amount of energy found in 1,500 tons of coal!

The way a nuclear power plant produces energy is by a process called nuclear fission which is splitting the nucleus of an atom. Fission turns water into steam and the steam makes pressure. Then the steam that is made turns a turbine that is connected to a generator and the turning of the turbine forces the generator to produce electricity (“Nuclear Fission”). The energy source for a nuclear power plant is Uranium and it is a very rare resource. Once it’s gone then it’s gone forever and when that happens then we cannot produce anymore nuclear energy. Depending on the demand of Uranium, it is estimated that this element will only last another thirty to sixty years. I am not for nuclear energy because I think that the cons out weigh the pros.