The Pros And Cons Of Obtaining A Law

Having a licensing system seems to be persecuting someone before the time. For instance, unpredictable things happen all the time, whether someone is not fully ready for a baby, once the child is born some people change their regular bad habits and become responsible, conscientious, and reliable. It’s a complete transformation for majority of parents. Good parenting simply does not just happen; it requires love, work, education and dedication. An irresponsible person before expecting can be the most reckless person, but once he/she knows that they are expecting the burden is on their shoulders and it pushes one to bear

1) Since the injured plaintiff was not wearing a seatbelt, why is Ford being sued for failing to test the seatbelt sleeve?

One reason California should implement this law is because it gives students an incentive to work hard and get better grades. When teenagers get their driver's licenses they have a whole new sense of freedom. When this privilege is revoked, many teens don't want to have to rely on other people to transport them places

(Lafollette.1980:p188) If it is determined someone is going to maltreat a child then a license should be denied. Lafollette infers, “this conditional way of formulating the right to have children provides a model for formulating all alleged rights to engage in hazardous activities”. (Lafollette.1980: p188) Denying licenses to incompetent drivers does not deny their human rights, so by using this model denying parenthood to incompetent parents does not violate their human

The state lawmaking body ought not pass a bill that would require a man to win a secondary school confirmation before he or she could get a driver's permit because of the way that it is a disadvantage. Folks would need to drive kids more places and the children would take more time to grow up.

People are going to do what they want, when they want so there is no possible way that they can control the action of people expanding their families. It is unconstitutional to not have the right to freely breed as often as possible.

Due to state safety concerns many states have raised the minimum legal age to drive. The state of Virginia, which is where I live, is now thinking of doing the same. This state should be looked at with careful consideration. The state of Virginia will look at all reasons why it should not be raised before coming to a conclusion. The driving age should not be raised because it would be much harder to get a job, having another driver in a large family can help with day to day tasks, and social freedom and growing up.

People should have a high school diploma before they get a driver's licences for two reasons they are, some people are too immature to be handling a driver's license, some people who do have a driver's licence but no car sometimes don’t really have enough education about how to drive cars, but for a counter claim ;however, Most people would learn at a younger and better age to drive than those who learn to old and have some difficulties remembering.

Pondering the question Can the law ever be truly just? Takes times because I found myself going back and forth. In deciding with my final thought I can not say that the law can be truly just. I could agree with saying that the law can be truly fair however, ‘truly just’ is not fully capable in Canada. With our current system of common law, I believe we are moving closer to what a just system looks like. When thinking of a man made system my views are quite simple. The law has stemmed down from the law given from God. We have not moved away from our roots making the man made system understandable. Our justice does not come in the court room or the prison cell but the moment that our life ends and God judges us.

The key differences between the “law on the books and “law in action, the phrase law on the books defers because the term law in the books is written and/or codified. Law in the books is written and laws to be followed by a country or state. Law in action refers to how and if a law is applied or enforced it varies depending on the enforcer. (“Answers.com in Criminal Law”, n.d.). The laws in the book includes, but are limited to the laws of this country and state, however, the key difference of laws in action is the enforcement of the laws.

As John Locke asserts in his Second Treatise of Government (1689), in the “state of nature”, men are quite alone in protecting and preserving their property. Each man judges matters for himself, and the security of a common authority is a mere fantasy. There is no larger power that is able to assist a man if he and his property are threatened. Men willingly leave their state of nature in order to enjoy the benefits and protection that the larger and more common power of government can offer them. The laws of the government act as a common restraint over all citizens of a country. Although we use the word “restraint,” in this case it implies liberation.

When President Bush signed the No Child Left Behind Act in 2002, he promised that his education reform would bring hope to children. The law calls for more testing in third to eighth grade each year in reading and math (Bacon, 2003). Students will be tested to make sure that the schools are adequately teaching them the information they should know.

The idea of requiring a license to have children at this time would have no chance of being implemented at this point in time. There are many objections and seemingly insurmountable obstacles that would be nearly impossible to circumvent. With the rapid advancements in technology as well as the evolving points of view of people throughout the country and around the world it is not impossible to think that this may be a viable option at some point in the future.

     I understand getting a license is difficult, but in the end everything you go through is worth it. The driver will have more experience, more time to learn, and the driver will learn to drive with others as well as driving on your own. So I think that establishment of graduated licenseing is a good thing for teenagers and for society. When you take your

Natural Law is a deontological moral theory (with several elements of teleological concepts) that determines the morality of an action based on the primary precepts, whilst also reflecting on human nature and rationally working out what leads us to happiness. One of the perceived strengths of Natural Law is the idea that is shares common human nature across the world. This means that we can uphold a moral standard that everyone must follow, rather than finding ourselves stuck with moral relativism or subjectivism. This is a benefit as if morality was subjective then any individual, such as Hitler would be able to justify his actions due to his interpretation of morality being subjective. Similarly, if morality is relative to a particular social culture, then what we think of being morally correct could simply just be a social construct, and we shouldn’t enforce this social construct onto others who follow their own moral law (an example of this is the Western Laws enforced in the Pitcairn trials). Because of a shared human moral code, Natural Law is one of the few moral codes that could state plainly and clearly that murder is wrong, without considering the time, place or scene. This argument, though having its merits, is a victim to what is known as the “is-ought” fallacy. This fallacy was introduced by David Hume and he said, “If something is a particular way by ‘nature’, it does not logically follow to conform. Therefore, even if we have a natural inclination to act in a