The Pros And Cons Of Precision Medicine

Personalized medicine is currently on the running towards becoming one of the leading advancing fields of health care determined by a person’s individual genetic make-up. It enables an understanding of the molecular framework of the human system so as to augment preventive therapeutic strategies. The move from reactive to preventive health care comes about with the implementation of personalized medicine as an alternative to traditional health care practices.

Concerns about AI also encompass whether it does create the most accurate diagnoses for patient care. Since AI uses large data banks to make decisions for what treatments may be best for a patient or for a diagnosis of an illness, people may be led to believe that this option is less personalized. Some people have made this belief since AI takes information from the general public to make a decision about an individual. However, research has shown that the accuracy of diagnoses when using data banks to make medical decisions is far more accurate than a diagnosis from a typical doctor. Also, doctors normally do not have the same opinions so that creates inconsistency for diagnoses, whereas AI would be consistent (Sissons, Ben. “Using Artificial Intelligence to Bring Evidence-Based Medicine a Step Closer to Making a Difference”). The average doctor gives correct diagnoses less than half the time. The accuracy for different diagnoses depend on the field of study. For example, the accuracy of AI for correctly diagnosing dermatological diseases was 97.55%. The accuracy for diagnosing a group of people with a certain type of diabetes came to be 79.37%, which is still higher than the average for a typical doctor (Lekkas, Stavros. “Evolving Fuzzy Medical Diagnosis of Pima Indians Diabetes and of Dermatological Diseases”). This research shows that AI is capable of making accurate diagnoses. Ethical concerns were

This particular goal mainly focused on privacy of the individual. Invasion to privacy is strictly restricted and all the health information about the patient should be used with their consent only. Moreover every health system manager have aware about legal implications currently in practice to protect privacy.

As described by Dr. Atul Gawande in his book Complications, medicine “is an imperfect science, an enterprise of constantly changing knowledge… fallible individuals” making medicine different from other scientific fields

Recent developments in technology have changed the delivery of health care and the system used to record and retrieve health information. In addition to using paper medical records, healthcare professionals, hospitals and insurers routinely use computers, phones, faxes, and other methods or recording and transferring information. In many instances, this information - which could include medical diagnoses, prescriptions, or insurance information - is readily available to anyone (including clerical and other staff) who walks by a fax machine or logs on to a computer. This lack of privacy has the potential to undermine patients' relationships with providers and adversely affect the quality of care. Patients may also fear that the exposure of personal health information, including the results of genetic tests that are becoming increasing available, could result in the loss or denial of health insurance, job discrimination or personal embarrassment.

In today’s world of technology patient’s face an ever challenging issue of protecting their privacy. One of the biggest areas infringing on a patient’s privacy would be the prescription health information that is being released by pharmacists and the way in which that information is used. Information is given to a wide variety of entities and to individuals, which raises enormous concern about the privacy rights of patients, especially considering the fact that the patient has not given consent for the release of this information.

Confidentiality in the Healthcare arena can be simply defined as the moral and ethical duty of the Practitioner to keep all the patient’s bio-data under lock and key, and offer a disclosure of those facts that the patient is legally mandated to disclose or deems fit to enhance their positive health outcome. According to the Segen’s Medical Dictionary, “Confidentiality is the ethical principle that a physician may not reveal any information disclosed in the course of medical care, unless the patient who disclosed that information poses a threat to him, herself or others’’

Even if you are not familiar with the medical world and all the privacy or ownership rules that are constantly forming, think of this in general terms. Invasion of privacy from the government listening in on your phone conversations, email, and so on. Think of the ways some companies break ethical rules by sharing our private information all over the web. An invasion of

HC2: With personalized medicine comes many areas of concern, including cost and ethics. It is well known that medical testing of any kind is typically very costly, and personalized medicine is no different. Medical institutions are often slow to adopt new technology and unwilling

The need for new and more effective treatment continues to increase and personalized medicine appears to be the answer to our prayers. With further research personalized medicine could revolutionize pharmaceuticals and to go out on a limb even find a cure for aids and other cancers. But it is too early to have high expectations for a science that has not been deeply explored. It seems that the fantasy of finding a perfect match treatment for each individual has raised support from many institutions including the White House and the FDA. There have been some recent personalized medicine treatments approved by the FDA and this has lead President Obama to bring forward the Precision Medicine Initiative (U.S. Food and Drug Administration), which would give millions in monetary support for research to be conducted on personalized medicine. The issue here is whether

In today’s health care industry providing quality patient care and avoiding harm are the foundations of ethical practices. However, many health care professionals are not meeting the guidelines or expectations of the American College of Healthcare Executives (ACHE) or obeying the organizations code of ethics policies, especially with the use of electronic medical records (EMR). Many patients fear that their personal health information (PHI) will be disclosed by hackers or unauthorized users. According to Carel (2010) “ethical concerns shroud the

Wiping out medication errors would diminish stumbles and mistakes, however, in the event that errors were thrown out of it would make it extremely troublesome on medical professionals who might need to work out exceptionally extensive curative terms. That is the reason numerous associations are creating composed arrangements expressing which truncations ought not to be utilized and medical experts are trained to compose clear while utilizing different contractions.

It is no secret that cancer is leading cause of death in the world. It was estimated that in 2012, 14.1 million new cases of cancer occurred worldwide and 8.2 million people died as a result of cancer [1]. Cancer prevalence is increasing at an alarming rate, yet the progress of treatment has been slow, with benefits of treatment being measured in only months or even weeks. Most patients with a specific type of cancer at a certain stage will receive the exact same form of treatment, but it has been made clear that while the treatment works well for some, it does not for a significant amount of others. The treatment that patients receive today is based on

The book The Personalized Medicine Revolution: How Diagnosing and Treating Disease are About to Change Forever is an interesting journey through the evolution of our scientific knowledge and subsequent technologies followed by a final foray into the most current accomplishments in personalized medicine and where it’s going.

Privacy and confidentiality are basic rights in our society. Safeguarding those rights, with respect to an individual’s personal health information, is our ethical and legal obligation as health care providers. Doing so in today’s health care environment is increasingly challenging (OJIN, 2005).