The Pros And Cons Of President Trump

“On January 27th, Trump signed an executive order temporarily banning travelers from seven Muslim-majority countries from entering the United States” (Wulfsohn). This ban did not just stop those from Islamic countries from coming to the United States for the first time in their life, it also revoked the visas from 60,000 people who had been US citizens. This is where most people see a major issue with the travel ban. While most will argue that the ban is in the interest of national security, the argument is that those 60,000 people that used to live in America, those who were born here, have families here, grew up here, are now not allowed back because they simply left the country.

I. Newly inaugurated President Donald Trump has recently approved a ban involving the restriction of travel into the United States of immigrants from seven Muslim countries. Since this ban is only for up to 90 days, this is just the beginning of a potentially longer or even permanent ban. This is not the first time he has demonstrated the lack of regard with social equality.

On January 27, 2017, President Trump issued an executive order that suspended entry of all refugees into the United States for one-hundred and twenty days. The order obstructed Syrian refugees for an unspecific time and blocked entry into the United States for ninety days for citizens of seven Muslim countries, such as: Sudan, Libya, Somalia, Iraq, Iran, Syria, and Yemen. This order also banned green card holder from these seven countries.

On Saturday, January 28th, Donald Trump enacted an immigrant ban on the countries of Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen. Trump believed that the Muslims in those states were terrorists and could possibly hurt the United States. When this ban came into effect, immigrants were stranded at airports and people, nation-wide, were livid and confused as to why the ban was enacted. Immigrants were frightened for their lives and wanted to go back to their home in America, but they were considered dangerous. After the ban, the United States chose sides on whether or not to support or despise the act. In, "Ask a Chicagoan, Mr. President, about 'dangerous' immigrants", the Chicago Sun-Times Editorial Board successfully persuades the Chicagoland

Donald Trump is running for president. He is laying down a lot of proposals. One of the biggest proposal is trying to ban Muslims from entering the United States, when he becomes president. Donald Trump addressed these issues saying that he is trying to protect the US and the people away from danger. This is important issue because it is unconstitutional.

President Trump has been attacking NFL players who have protested against oppression of people of color by kneeling during the National Anthem. In doing this, he has been suppressing the natural rights of the NFL and its players. The Declaration of Independence states, “... they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” (Jefferson 1). Natural Rights are given to everyone at birth and cannot be taken away. Henceforth, the president has been restraining the rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness from the NFL.

President Trump's executive order " Muslim Ban" blocking people of Iran, Iraq, Sudan, Syria, Libya, Yemen, and Somalia from coming to the U.S. Trump’s ideology is to protect the American people from Muslim terrorist attacks to make America safe again. Trump and his team may not be aware that by combining Muslims and terrorists; they spreading the suspicion, fear and consequently rising Islamophobia and racism. The ban disrupting the personal and professional lives of millions of immigrants who have been settled their life in America with the hope of freedom and fortune. Unfortunately, mainstream media have been controlling the flow of information, brainwashing and manipulating people, spreading misrepresentations and fears about Muslim, and

Seven days after taking office, President Trump signed the Immigration Order, more commonly known as his first travel ban. This ban denied allowing citizens from seven countries (Iraq, Iran, Somalia, Libya, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen) into the United States. It also

In Syria, 2,500 people have died on boats due to the current war. They have sought for refuge in the United States only to be turned around. On January 27, 2017 the current president of the United States, Donald J. Trump, signed a travel ban to six predominantly Muslim countries: Iraq, Syria, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and

Starting seven days after President Trump moved into office he signed an order to keep terrorism out of our country. When he signed the order he picked seven countries which were Syria, Iran, Iraq, Sudan, Libya, Somalia, and Lebanon to be kept out of America. Many people were protesting against this so President Trump decided to take Iraq off. The citizens of these countries were to be kept out of the United States, but there were still some exceptions to this law. Based off of many different things like religion, many people end up having different opinions about the Travel Ban. Some people think President Trump made a good decision while others think he is not being American because most Americans are immigrants from the countries he banned.

In the United States, President Trump recently issued a travel ban from seven Muslim majority countries: Libya, Iran, Iraq, Sudan, Somalia, and Syria due to concerns of the safety of American citizens. However, it was recently overruled by Federal Judge James L. Robart but the president has vowed to have the ruling overturned or have another similar executive order written in its place. The ban consisted of visa restrictions in place for ninety days, refugee admission program suspended for one hundred and twenty days, and Syrian refugees’ admission suspended indefinitely until President Trump feels the vetting procedures are strong enough to ensure terrorists are not allowed in the country on a refugee visa.

President Trump has plenty of behavior to show that his opposition to multiculturalism. For example, he announced a new refugee admission cap at 24th October in 2017. This one is tighter than before. (Roberts and Mears, 2017). I found a quite interesting thing that among over two thousands comments of this news, most of people are criticize Trump. I nearly can not find people who support him. Most of people believe that this banning is useless and it will hurt innocents and victims in the end. The people who hold weapons can not be prevented. (Roberts and Mears, 2017). From these replies, I do not think Trump’s view can gain popularity from the majorities. Due to announced this banning is one of the newest political behavior of Trump, I refer

On Facebook, I sought out opinions on this social justice issue by searching through public postings for the hashtags #travelban, #muslimban, #nobannowall, #refugees, #Americafirst, and #buildthewall. The vast majority of views presented by those using these hashtags were against the ban. One common theme held by those against the ban is that it was discriminatory. By adding Venezuela and North Korea to the list, the social media opinion is that Trump is trying to distract from it being a racist ban targeting Muslims. For example, Aram Shahinfard (2017) states in his Facebook update, “So he added a few more countries to make it a not-muslim ban? It is still not acceptable!” His Facebook friend,

According to data obtained by CNN, since the Refugee Act of 1980, which vets refugees thoroughly prior to allowing them sanctuary in the United States, there have been no terrorist attacks conducted by any refugees, from any country. In fact, prior to the Refugee Act of 1980 there were only three attacks and they were conducted by Cuban refugees. On January 27, 2017, exactly one week after Donald Trump was sworn into office as President, he issued an executive order halting the entry of refugees from seven Muslim majority countries: Iran, Somalia, Sudan, Libya and most controversially Syria, Yemen, and Iraq. Essentially this order came to be known as the travel ban. Trump implemented this ban on the basis of national security, claiming the need to protect American citizens. The travel ban has been controversial due to its targeting of primarily Muslim refugees, while still allowing for the influx of refugees of minority religions from the region such as Christians. This essay will explore and compare both the positive and negative aspects of the travel ban by analyzing its components and the possible effects it could have on the United States.

Many people contemplate if the travel ban helps or if it makes stuff worse. The travel ban is an order that was signed by president Trump to forbid some countries to come to the United States. Many people see the travel ban as something good for the United States because there is less fear about surprise attacks. Many other people do not think it helps the United States, that it makes it worse because not everyone is the same as their family or race and the United States is not respecting it is rights. The travel ban is not helpful for national security, it is racist, and it is unconstitutional.