The Pros And Cons Of Slavery In The United States

Slavery. A topic that should never be brought up in a conversation, should never be said casually, and should never happen. Slavery, despite being illegal in every country, is still going on, and at different odds. Slavery has many forms. Many of which, only the cruelest of minds can think up. Slavery is different than in the 1800s because it has many more forms, has more potential slaves, and more profit.

The north figured that giving the African Americans jobs would help improve the economy. This opportunity of work encouraged the people who had yet to migrate to do so. Those who did were soon disappointed when they discovered their salary. Yes, they were given a job opportunity, but their wages were nowhere near as much as a white person’s.

African Americans were slaves during the Civil War and most slaves were in the South. After the Civil War, slaves became free due to the 13th Amendment which abolished slavery. But are African Americans truly free even though slavery has been abolished? African Americans were free because of the 13th Amendment but they were not free at the same time because of how they are treated still after the abolishment of slavery, the laws they made only on African Americans in the Southern states, and the African Americans were given a new life, but they did not know what to do because all they were was slaves, so how is it fair to be mistreated when they do not know what to do? This is how they were free but they were not at the same time.

The South side is a cruel, but not just cruel also bloodthirsty side. Imagine working countless hours in all types of weather, farming or blacksmithing. Slave’s body shaking from the coldness of no warm clothing they can wear or overheating in an outrageous humid climate. Working on their hands and knees every single day. South still not pleased about their work. The North is at a attempt to seek to abolish slavery, but the South does not agree with North and to continue slavery. However, slavery should end because slave’s do get beaten, taken away from people they love, and others say that slavery should not be abolished.

Northern Republicans and Southern Democrats attempted to cure their complete opposition on the regulation of slavery by using federal power to coerce an end to the feud, yet the movement increased tension between the divided nation. By invoking both legislative and judicial power, politicians used laws which included slave codes and freedom laws as well as court decisions like Dred Scott v Sandford (1875) to convince or force the population into acceptance of stances on slavery. Each party viewed their tactics and ideas to be righteous, and though they intended for positive results, national outrage answered the governmental movement.

Slaves and their families were ecstatic after the war, they could finally reconnect with their family. But finding a job to provide for the family was very difficult. Former slaves didn’t have any work experience except for farming and on top of that there was very few jobs available to them as everybody was looking for work. They also didn’t have any savings in their bank account because they were slaves, so they couldn’t start their own business if they wanted to. Nor did they have anything to sell or trade in for food or shelter.

Throughout history there have been many victors in war, and through these victors they would claim all kinds of rewards. These rewards could range from money to slaves. The slaves that were captured were usually not discriminated by race, but when the United States took on slavery it was on a different scale. The slaves were stripped of their basic human rights, taken away from their home by force, and was trained to become better slaves. America had slaves for 245 years the slaves turned out to be a big part in the day to day life, without the slaves America would not be able to get to where they are at today. Even though half of the United States agreed that owning slaves and the idea of slavery was a good thing the other half of the United States did not treat the slaves any better. With the

During the majority of the nineteenth century, slavery was still prevalent until a couple years after the Civil War. This period is when slavery was slowly diminishing as time progressed, but not as much as anti-slavery individuals and organizations would have wanted, particularly in the north. These individuals were willing to put everything on the line to permanently abolish slavery, which was mostly still in existence in the south. Not even official government documents could eliminate the presence of slavery that existed, even if they were from the President of the United States of America, Abraham Lincoln. Therefore, extra help and force were needed, even if it was from someone that the people of the United States were not expecting. Frederick Douglass was continuously called by government officials to offer guidance on how the strategic abolishment of slavery should be completed. Douglass was invited to the White House numerous time to discuss the issue with President Lincoln, and the door was always open to him whenever he needed to discuss ideas of civil importance with the President.

Slaveholder has a negative side just like the slaves did. Douglass first master was named Anthony he was called Captain Anthony, he was not considered a rich slaveholder. He owned about two or three farms and thirty slaves. Douglass thought he was a cruel man and that he didn’t think like all the other slaveholders. For the slaves there was a negative side that most everyone saw.

Lincoln believed that the United States of America was headed down one of two paths; all citizens will accept slavery as a normal law, or we will stop this unconstitutional act. The United States of America will be divided over this political issue based on various reasons.

As far back as we reach, the keeping of slaves/ servants has been a part of civilization, and make no mistake, civilization only. Prior to that, there was no need since life was simple; hunt, gather and eat was the way to go. At the time, a slave would have been simply another mouth to feed, and they would have had to hunt as well. The “need” for slaves comes as man “civilizes” and reaches out for cheap labor. But Slavery as we know it now is not at all as it was in the past. Slaves in Babylon were allowed to own land; slaves in Greece and Rome were afforded privileges based on their status, and was mostly owned by the state. While there were incidences of cruelty, for the most part they were isolated. The Muslims kept slaves as well, and while the Qur’an doesn’t speak against it directly, it espouses good treatment of them and in particular the females. There is altogether no comparison in the way these slaves were kept and treated as opposed to in Christian Communities.

In early 17th century, European settlers used slaves as cheap servants. Slaves were the personal property of their owners, and slave masters had absolute authority over them as human property. Chattel slaves, as they were traditionally referred to in the past, were bought and sold as if they were possessions. Even though owning a person as property was lawfully protected in the United States, enslaved individuals were not protected from mistreatment and abuse they endured. Historically, slaves experienced abuse at the hands of their masters. Slaves were chained, whipped and were often beaten while withstanding days of hard labor. Although we are taught that slavery ended centuries ago and the 13th amendment

Lincoln believed that slavery was ethically wrong, however there was one major issue: It was endorsed by the most noteworthy law in the land, the Constitution. The country's establishing fathers, who likewise battled with how to address subjugation, did not expressly compose "servitude" in the Constitution, yet they included key conditions ensuring the organization, including a criminal slave proviso and the three-fifths proviso, which enabled Southern states to tally slaves for the reasons for portrayal in the government. In a three-hour discourse in Peoria, Illinois, in the fall of 1854, Lincoln introduced more obviously than any time in recent memory his good, lawful and monetary restriction to subjugation—and after that conceded he didn't know precisely what ought to be done about it inside the current political framework.

In the land of the free, saying slavery is a dark part of the United States’ history would be an understatement. From the early 1600’s until the abolition of the practice in 1865, slavery would be a common sight amongst plantations. The slaves would not stand idly in their predicament, learning how to improve their situations and sometimes reaching compromises or rebelling against slave masters. Slavery during the antebellum United States encompassed the ideals of whites in the North and South, the influential relationships between the whites and blacks, and the controversial lives the slaves led.

Generally speaking, slavery is still a rather sensitive topic in the modern day era. Many quarrel about how slavery impacted society, the pros and cons to slavery, and other frivolous matters. In contrast, has anyone ever thought to take under consideration the affect slavery had on one that undergone the experience? Thereupon, Ila Prine ventured down to a district in Alabama to interview one such man. Hence, she met with Joseph Holmes, a slave who proceeded to ascribe to her the working ideals as a past slave.