The Pros And Cons Of Standardized Testing

With such high stakes involved, standardized testing has become less about the student’s progression, and more about the survival of the educational institution itself. Legislations such as No Child Left Behind and Race to The Top have resulted in the very thing they have tried to overcome. Children who score low are being left behind due to instances of teacher intervention during testing or exclusion, and students who excel in schools are being developmentally held back with curriculums being narrowed to focus on the tested materials to ensure they pass as

Standardized tests have been a piece of education dating back to the 1800’s. Letdowns in education have been blamed on teacher quality, rising levels of poverty, tenure policies, and more so the widespread use of standardized testing. Many different typed of standardized tests are being used, but the ones that have triggered the most controversy are the high-stakes assessments. While past generations of students in America have had to go through tests, the tests were not given so frequently and they did not play such a obvious role in education. Exams used to be given mostly to determine where students would be placed or what kind of assistance they needed, but lately scores have been published in the papers and used as the main standards for judging teachers, children, and schools. Through my research I have found that there are just as many people for standardized tests as are against.

In my many years of education, standardized tests have been a widely-used form of academic measurement. Each year of school brought a new, more advanced, test that I had to conquer. These seemed to be preparation for a higher-stakes sort of test. The ACT. A test that would decide where I go to college, and how much money it would cost me. For decades, standardized tests have been the main source for information on student progress in schools. A contrast of views has become more prevalent in recent years on the fairness and validity of the results of these tests. What is it that these exams test for? Do they hold teachers accountable? Do the tests promote academic progress and college

First, standardized test can objectively measure student achievement. The tests ensure that the content is equivalent for all students throughout the nation. Although each teacher may choose different method to deliver the core content that all students should learn, standardized tests can unify such diverse learning experiences on a regular basis to close any gaps among students. Critics may argue that the current standardized tests are not entirely fair, yet they have to

Standardized Testing are required in many schools and states across our country. These tests are said to measure students academic performances in school. More and more students lives are becoming influenced by standardized testing. They are forced to memorize what they learned, not showcase it the rest of the world. People think that standardized testing is a good way to compare the performance levels of different students from different schools and also different locations. But what they don’t understand is that standardized testing is an absolute unreliable way of finding the performance of a student. Although most schools make students take these standardized tests, it for sure does not measure the knowledge and creativity within a student.

In some states, many parents were furious because if their child does not receive a certain score he or she will not be admitted into the middle schools the parents prefer. Today the United Opt Out Movement to end corporate education reform their web page states: “…We demand equally funded democratically based, anti-racist, desegregated public school for all americans…”(1). Standardized testing and whether or not it is the most ideal way to measure one's intelligence and overall proficiency is a controversial topic because not only has the testing been around for 6 decades plus, the problem exists on a national level. Therefore there is no one solution to the

Over the years, a debate has emerged arguing the fairness and the reliability of standardized tests. The outcome of this dispute not only directly impacts students, but also teachers and administrators, many whose jobs are placed on the line when the test scores come back. There are many exceptional points for both why the tests should be completely eradicated and also for why the tests should stay right where they are. A main argument for the tests is that they place students that may not have similar opportunities on a level playing field. The ACT, SAT, and other akin tests are the best way to test not only content knowledge, but also students’ ability to perform under pressure, a skill needed to succeed in college and the workforce.

OH NO! You have to take the standardized test today,and you are not prepared. Standardized tests have been a part of

Standardized testing scores proficiencies in most generally accepted curricular areas. The margin of error is too great to call this method effective. “High test scores are generally related to things other than the actual quality of education students are receiving” (Kohn 7). “Only recently have test scores been published in the news-paper and used as the primary criteria for judging children, teachers, and schools.”(2) Standardized testing is a great travesty imposed upon the American Public School system.

Standardized testing only measures a small portion of what makes education substantial. This means that education isn’t only about what is taught in each subject, but is also about how students learn and use their knowledge as

Taking standardized is very popular when trying to evaluate a student academic achievement. These test are usually taken once you hit junior year in high school or when trying to apply for college. Some students argue that one test is harder than the other, therefore taking these test has both benefits and drawbacks. When picking which test to take you should always consider the following, which suits you best, are you good in science, and are you better at solving problems or remembering the material. The two most common standardized tests in the USA are the SAT and he ACT. The SAT evaluates skills in vocabulary and mathematics, while the ACT test your knowledge and also includes science. The purpose of this test is to be able to look at the

Much of what we hear about standardize testing is false. Because of repeated use and drilling of

To test or not to test, this is currently a subject of an intense debate amongst parents, educators, and administrators in the domain of education. Unfortunately, providing teachers in the K-12 system the freedom to teach for the simplistic joy of teaching, does not typically hold educators accountable. Standardized testing is one of the necessary evils when it comes to the measurement of student achievement. While there are arguments on both sides of the subject concerning high stakes testing, there must be at least a designated method of standardized assessments in order to ensure students are prepared for their future, increase parents or guardian of their child’s academic measurements, and increase teacher accountability with respect to

I Think standardize tests don’t measure a student intelligence. Not everyone would agree with my opinion but testing makes students feel very unsettled and nerves. Standardized testing do not measure a student’s intelligence. Standardized testing has a purpose and it shouldn’t ever challenge a person mind. It could lead them thinking if they are smart. These tests could have a negative impact on student and teacher health and I can add stress to administration because state funding is tied to the scores. But for some people standardized testing can track yearly educational growth patterns and provide local school systems with state and national comparison.

The “No Child Left Behind” era was the major start to the government taking control of the education of students and “holding schools accountable for the academic performance of students”(NCLB). The government requires state testing for students in grades 3-5, 6-8, and 10-12 to show if students are meeting grade level requirements. Often this has negative consequences, because teachers will often focus on teaching the requirements needed for state testing and many core elements are not taught. With these tests not promoting any knowledge or skill, how can the school think students will seek a higher education? These standardized test are biased with the state requiring reports for, “specific student subgroups, including low-income students, students with disabilities, English language learners, and major racial and ethnic groups to be individually profiled based on their test scores” (NCLB). This era continued for over