The Pros And Cons Of The Bill Of Rights

The bill of rights is a popular document that was not originally in the US constitution, but anti federalists wanted a bill of rights really bad because supposedly they were afraid of a strong central government. They did not want another king so some states refused the constitution until there was a bill of rights. Along with being afraid of a central government they wanted a limited government so that government could not control them. The anti federalists also thought the government would not protect their individual rights enough so they wanted a bill of rights.

The Anti-federalists opposed the Constitution because they believed it did not secure their rights and gave the government too much power. (2) Patrick Henry, an Anti-federalist from Virginia said that the constitution took away the states rights to be individual and to make separate decisions as well. (4) The Federalists saw the Anti-federalists complaint and realized that in order for the Constitution to be passed, they would need a Bill of Rights. (6) This Bill of Rights would give rights to the people and the states. 12 amendments were submitted for ratification by congress, but the states only ratified 10 of them. They became know as the Bill of Rights which made most

James Madison presents the Bill of Rights to the First Federal Congress on June 8, 1789 (Primary Documents 1). The First Federal Congress then suggests the twelve amendments to the constitution to their state legislatures (Constitutional Politics in Ohio 1). The very first two articles weren't authorizing. Articles three through twelve were amended on December 15, 1791 (Constitutional Politics in Ohio 1). This was called The Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights became the very first ten amendments to the United States Constitution (Primary Documents 1). Which means the powers delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited because of it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or even to the

The Constitution of the United States was made through compromises that not everyone agreed on but they came to an agreement on what they thought it should be. Before all of the fifty states were founded there was not a Bill of Rights, it was not until the new government was up and running before the Bill of Rights was added. The reason for this was that the framers of the constitution did not realize that the Bill of Rights was necessary to have at the time. A certainly important choice that was made was how our government was to be

When the first ten amendments were added to the Constitution, they were planned to shield the public from the national government and not the states. States had their individual constitutions, and their laws only had to comply with their constitution. The founders of our country were very concerned about creating too powerful of a centralized government that might overstep on the given civil liberties of the public. As a protection of individual liberties, the Bill of Rights was formed. The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of the Constitution and protect and preserve inalienable rights against abuse by the federal government.

During the Constitutional Convention, the Federalists and Anti Federalists disagreed on many aspects of the Constitution.The Federalists wanted a strong central government while the Anti Federalists were more for state rights. That is just a small fraction of the many arguments that these two factions disagreed upon. The Constitution was eventually ratified with the Federalists compromising with the Anti Federalists by adding The Bill of Rights, a list of the general rights that a citizen was entitled to. Although the Bill of Rights gives us our inalienable rights, the government has compromised our rights to a significant extent many times in history due to fear, corruption, and control.

The Constitution did not include the Bill of Rights, the Anti- Federalists believed that this was yet another example of there being no limit on the centralized government’s power, and there was no protection for the

The Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments of the United States constitution and they are basically a list of restrictions of government powers, not all government powers of course, but certain liberties that the authors deemed necessary to restrict the government from having full control over. These amendments cause a lot of controversy between the citizens that they are to protect because they are interpreted differently by different mindsets and are left a bit open to interpretation that causes confusion and dare I say chaos at times. Lastly, it seems that the Bill of Rights is the only section the mass majority of citizens talk about when they are arguing about the constitution or anything that has to deal with liberties.

For example, Federalist Paper 78, published in 1788, justified the judicial system by explaining how it protected the Constitution and thus the people as well as acted in the best interest of the country. Through the collective efforts of the Federalists, eventually, the Constitution was passed by all states. In 1791, compelled by strong public sentiments for protection of individual rights like Mason’s, the first Congress under the Constitution added a list of ten amendments to the Constitution, known collectively as the Bill Of Rights. These first ten amendments to the Constitution, which protected rights ranging from freedom of speech and religion to the due process of law, were able to somewhat reconcile the differences between Federalists and Anti-Federalists (later known as the Democratic-Republicans), and to build and solidify the public’s trust of a democratic, central

Federalists argued that the Constitution would improve the nation’s economy and social status, as well as fixing the errors made in the Articles of Confederation. Anti-federalists argued that the new Constitution’s executive branch received too much power and the poorer and less educated would receive the least power. Anti-federalists also argued that the Constitution would violate their natural rights and freedoms. Although the Anti-federalists may have made solid arguments, the federalists won the debate. In order for the Anti-federalists to agree with the U.S. Constitution. The convention compromised with the Anti-federalists to write the Bill of Rights to protect and secure citizens rights. Slowly, but surely the U.S. corrected other errors addressed by the Anti-federalists Constitution along the way. All in all, this discourse was a healthy debate for shaping the present United States of

The first ten amendments to the constitution make up the Bill of Rights. These amendments were written by James Madison in response to the call for individual liberties. Madison was a member of the United States House of Representatives. He went through the Constitution line by line making changes that he thought they were most needed. Several Representatives, led by Roger Sherman, said that Congress had no authority to make the change to the Constitution. Madison’s changes were added as lists of amendments that would follow Article VII. The Bill of Rights lists the specific liberties that can’t be prohibited by the United States government. This document starts out with the Virginia Declaration of Right, written by George Mason, this document

On June 8, 1789 one of the Founding Fathers of the United States of America, James Madison proposed the Bill of rights to the House of Representatives (Document F). He and many other patriots saw that there were certain areas that had not been addressed in the Constitution that left the ability for those who were in the central government to abuse their powers and unreasonably control the American people. Now you have to take into consideration that the American citizens had to battle for years just to be free of the tyrannical powers of the King of England, and they wanted to make sure at all costs that this did not happen again. A constitution that ensured popular sovereignty was the only answer to this dilemma. The Bill of Rights was soon after ratified and it ensured the people liberties such as, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press…,” (Document G). These rights given to the people among many others which were not mentioned made it so that the central government could do their job of governing the people, but they also gave the people the right to rebel and speak out against the government if they were being treated unfairly. Without the Bill of Rights being added to the Constitution of this country there would be no

Thirty-Three amendments have been proposed by The Congress but only twenty-seven of them have been ratified by the requisite number of states. The First ten amendments were originally approved and later known generally as the Bill of Right. They are in order entitled; The Freedom of religion, Speech, and the Press; The Right to Bear Arms; The Housing of Soldiers; Protection from Unreasonable Searches and Seizures; Protection of Rights to Life, Liberty, and Property; Rights of Accused Person in Criminal Cases; Right of Civil Cases; Excessive Bail, Fine, and Punishments Forbidden; Other Rights Kept by the People; and Undelegated Powers Kept by the State and the People. The lack of a Bill of Right was one of the main points of contention between the Federalist and Antifederalist. On one hand, Federalists says that the Constitution didn’t need The Bill of Rights because the state and the people kept any powers not given to the federal government. On the other hand, Anti-Federalist want a bill of right to protect personal liberty. Thus, the amendments of The Bill of Rights adds to the Constitution a specific guarantees of rights and individual

James Madison wrote the 10 amendments, known as the Bill of Rights when several states requested protection of their individual liberties(BILL OF RIGHTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (1791). The Federalists argued that the Constitution didn't need the bill of rights because the people and states kept any powers that was not given to the federal government. However, the Anti-Federalists felt the need to have the bill of rights for safeguarding individual liberty(BILL OF RIGHTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (1791). In 1789, when the Congress proposed the first ten amendments for their first session, they received three-fourths by several States, so it became a part of the Constitution(1791: US Bill of Rights (1st 10 Amendments) - with commentary). The Federalists supported a stable national government to preserve order, and 2/3 majority of the states must ratify for the Bill of Rights to be a part of the Constitution(Bill of Rights 1791). It went through several changes and The House approved 17 amendments, but the Senate only approved 12. Therefore, they were sent to the states for approval in August of 1789, and ten were quickly adopted (or, ratified). The Bill of Rights was officially passed on December 15, 1791, when Virginia ratified the amendments(Bill of Rights 1791). Although the Constitution doesn’t really focus economic terms in details, it still recognizes the right to own property and enter into contracts(The Constitution - economic rights and opportunities).

The bill of rights has a variety of pros and cons. To start off with, now only it would recognize certain fundamental human rights, it would give further legal protection to the most vulnerable minorities in our society(Bill of Rights Pros, Cons). Next, it would protect protect our society from arbitrary governments and rogue politicians(Bill of Rights Pros, Cons). However, there are also cons in the bill of rights. For example, it erode the sovereignty of the legislature immediately and continually. Next it would be undemocratic since it politicise the judiciary by giving unelected judges virtual executive powers and weakening the necessary checks and balances that are fundamental to good governance(Bill of Rights Pros, Cons). The bill of