The Pros And Cons Of The Boxer Rebellion

Decent Essays
In the debate, one side claims that the Boxer Rebellion was fueled by a large drought, which the boxers claimed was being invoked by the Christians. The other side of the debate says that the rebellion was mainly fueled by the fear and hatred of foreigners, especially christians. The people who claim the drought have a valid point, because in the places where the rebellion was the bloodiest, were also the areas where the drought was the worst. However, the people who say that it was mainly foreign hate, reminding the opposition that people in 1900’s were sophisticated enough to not truthfully blame natural phenomenons on witchcraft. The article says that China had been losing the trust of outside nations. This started when China was unable
Get Access