The Pros And Cons Of The Constitutional Convention

The Southern states wanted to include slaves (who could not vote) in their population counts to increase their numbers of representatives but the Northern states did not support slavery and did not want to give the South too much power. The three-fifths compromise solved the issue of determining state population for assigning the number of representatives in the House for each state. It said that all slaves were worth three-fifths of a free person and this was added to the number of free people to create a population count. This was the method used for determining population for direct taxes as well. This allowed the South to make up forty-seven percent of the house so they were able to protect their own

The Connecticut Compromise, also known as the Great Compromise; settled a conflict within the nation in 1787.

Answer: The first compromise was called the three-fifths compromise and what was compromised was that slaves would only count for partially in representation of states. The Great compromise is the second compromise, which was between Virginia and New Jersey. This created a bicameral government where states represented equal in the upper house (senate) and lower house (house of representatives). This gave a unbalanced influence to states with small populations.

On May 25, 1787, fifty-five delegates from twelve states met in Philadelphia to revise the Articles of Confederation. Instead, they decided to totally scrap the Articles and create a new Constitution, known as "a bundle of compromises." Whatever these leaders ' personal desires, they had to compromise and adopt what was acceptable to the entirety of America, and what presumably would be suitable to the nation as a whole. There were many compromises made at the Constitutional Convention, such as representation, slavery, and laws concerning foreign/ interstate imports and exports.

The main point was that slaves should be counted as three-fifths. The argument was northern and southern states the reasons slavery issue. Because the Southern holds their states as a slave state and adding slave as property on the other way the northern states did not want people as a slave. It was the most controversial issue southern was the large populations the reason won the point because of the percentage. Another main point was the economy totally depended on slavery because cheap labor, but northers was popular in trading like rice, tobacco stuff. They eliminate the fight two states made three-Fifths Compromise. In 1783 the article proposed tax should be a portion of the population, then, had a problem again slaver issue not paying tax equally. It was a great solution to add on three fifths as a

The 1787 Constitutional Convention was paramount in unifying the states after the Revolutionary War. However, in order to do so, the convention had to compromise on many issues instead of addressing them with all due haste. This caused the convention to leave many issues unresolved. Most notably were the issues of slavery, race, secession, and states’ rights. Through the Civil War and the Reconstruction, these issues were resolved, and in the process the powers of the federal government were greatly expanded.

After the American Revolution, the newly created Union had no system of government because the North and South were very divided on many topics, such as representation in the government. Larger states wanted representation in government to be based on population, while smaller states did not. The Great Compromise of 1787 ultimately solved this conflict by creating the House of Representatives and the Senate, but created a new conflict over whether slaves should count towards a state’s population. While the South wanted slaves to count towards the population so that they could have more seats in the House of Representatives, the North did not want slaves to count because they did not want the South to have more power. In 1787, this conflict was solved by the 3/5ths Compromise, where a slave counted as 3/5ths of a person.

The Three Fifths Compromise was for the most part about slaves. To figure out whether slaves ought to be meant representation for every state. The North did not need them

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise between the southern states and northern states during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention. The dispute was over if and how slaves were going to be considered when completing a state’s entire population for voting purposes. Instead of with straining the importation of slave in the southern states, slavery was given something new, a political life. Even when the Act Prohibiting Importation of Slaves of 1807 seized the importation of anymore slaves, the south found another way of trying to increase its political status in Congress by breeding slaves. Most Northern states wanted no part in the dispute about the count of slaves. Some argued that they should be treated as property, since

The first compromise is called the “Three fifths Compromise.” Since the house vote was now based on population, the North and South were arguing if slaves counted. They came to a compromise where slaves would be considered three fifths of a human, instead of an entire human being. (Yes, it was insanely racist and messed up). Basically every five slaves would count as three people, instead of five.

The compromise of 1820 was a shot by the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives to keep up a stability of power among the slaveholding states and free states. The only thing the slaveholding feared is that if they became outnumbered in legislature illustration and that they would not have the capability to protect the interests within the trade and also property. Northern states denied it, feeling that Southern slaveholding states hold an excessive amount of power already. The Constitution accepted states to count every slave as three-fifths of an individual for functions of determining population, and thus, the amount of legislature representatives the state was entitled to. This had given the South a plus in Congress. The slaveholding

Our Constitutional Convention was affected by many things prior to the event. Many discussions were arranged in order to set up alliances and partnerships. As a Southern Plantation owner, my group had many preliminary discussions and we formed an agreement with the Bankers, Workers, and the Farmers. These discussions were necessary because my group needed to form agreements and get others to vote for our cause and this could only be arranged if we held preliminary discussions, which we did. There are many lessons to be taught when it comes to preliminary discussions. Before discussing any topics, you need to know who to confer with. Say you need to discuss about slavery, you wouldn’t talk to the slaves, your best option would to be to talk to the farmers. Also, when setting up agreements you need to make sure that any previous agreements don’t interfere with your current agreement. For example, you made a deal with the Bankers that payment in kind

There were many disagreements and compromises that occurred while in the process of creating the Constitution. Some were: the debate over slavery, the debate of the Virginia plan and the New Jersey plan, and the disagreement about the amount of time the president should work. There was a huge debate over slavery and the states were torn between abolishing slavery and owning slaves. A three-fifths clause was created so that slaves would be considered part of the state’s population. Three-fifths of the slave population was a compromise where some of the slaves would be counted “in determining each state’s representation in the House of Representatives and its

The Compromise of 1850 was written by Henry Clay to try and solve the problems between the North and South. They thought that the compromise would make things better, but it ended up making things worse. The compromise was to fix the Fugitive slave law and make California a free state. There was many reason why the North and the South didn't like this compromise. The whole slave situation was one of the most frustrating of the compromise.

The Republic of Jarth constitutional convention was held on April 26th, 2017. From this convention we the people of Jarth have agreed on certain criteria concerning the future of our country. Although we did not get to all topics, of the ones we did cover, we did so in a simplistic manner and I think that is why we are destined for doom. From the very beginning of how we setup the convention I knew we were setting ourselves up for failure. The UN put us in a spot that we couldn't get anything done. We had representation from each group based on population and had a majority voting during the convention. The votes can be skewed because two groups could vote to pass something for the constitution with two other groups saying that they want to