The Pros And Cons Of The Donald Trump Immigration Ban?

comprehensive immigration reform could bring to this country, to the native- born and immigrants workers as well. Also, he makes emphasis in how the number of undocumented immigrants has increased since 1990’s; therefore, the economy of United States has dramatically increased.

A Federal Judge temporarily barred Trump’s Executive Order concerning the travel ban. This has caused extreme controversy among American’s as topics such as immigration, refugees, vetting, and religion all take tolls on the perspectives of the media as well as the average American. Nevertheless, the travel ban has been critiqued as well as praised by different groups and the Federal’s Judge’s emergency order has sparked debate on the constitutionality of the order.

The Travel Ban marks a major turning point in the policies on immigration in the United States. Due to increased terrorist attacks and illegal immigrant numbers rising, it is believed that temporarily banning immigrants from particular countries is key to ensuring safety within the United States. Though many have expressed their concern towards the ban because of its similarity to previous discriminatory and unconstitutional acts. The ban has even been referred to as the “Muslim Ban”.

Your professor schedules a class debate on pros and cons of the enforcement of federal immigration laws by the local polices. which side would you take? The local police must be involved in the enforcement of federal immigration law.

Met with mass protest and public outrage, the original travel ban was an executive order issued on January 27,2017. The ban rolled out an elaborate scheme said to protect the American people and “Make America Great Again”. The ban set a cap of 50,000 refugees to be accepted into the USA during 2017. It also included a temporary ban on Syrian refugees as well as people arriving from seven countries with predominantly Muslim populations. After being found in violation Immigration & Nationality Act of 1965 due to its discriminatory nature, the order is now back and has been redrafted.

Immigration is a hot button topic today and so many people have different opinions about it, but who oversees its laws? Our government is split into three main branches, Legislative, Executive and Judicial. Every branch contributes in a different way to have a law in action. The Legislative branch, which contributes to the first step of making any law, consists of the house of representatives and the senate, which together form the United States Congress which have the supreme authority to enact legislation, the privilege to confirm or reject many presidential appointments, and massive investigative powers (“The Legislative Branch”, 2017). The Executive branch, contributes to enforcing the laws and it mainly involves the President of the United States, who also acts as head of state and commander-in-chief of the armed forces. The President is responsible for implementing and enforcing the laws written by Congress and, to that end, appoints the heads of the federal agencies, including the Cabinet (“The Executive Branch”, 2017). The Judicial branch, puts the final touches on the law and polishes it. It consists of the United States Supreme Court and lower federal courts. The Supreme Court's primary function is to hear cases that challenge the constitutionality of legislation or require interpretation of that legislation ("The Judicial Branch", 2017). Immigration laws are made within the Legislative branch, carried out by the Executive branch, and evaluated by the Judicial

“In 2014, 5.8 million unauthorized immigrants from Mexico lived in the U.S.,” according to Pew Research Center (Krogstad). Regulating the number of illegal immigrants from entering the United States has become an increasingly significant issue for the federal government’s agenda after, the number of unauthorized immigrants reached a peak in 2007 at 12.2 million, when this group made up 4% of the U.S. population (Krogstad). An abundance of proposed solutions have been offered to limit the steadily increasing number of illegal immigrants from reaching American soil, such as: mandating E-verify, a system that determines whether or a not a person is eligible to work in the United states, strengthening border security, and fortifying interior enforcement measures in the United States (Illegal Immigration and Border Security). Another major plan sources from President Donald Trump, who hopes to build a wall spanning between the United States and Mexico. This idea has ignited numerous opposing arguments that have picked out its irrationalities, and display how Donald Trump’s proposal to erect a wall generates more complications than benefits.

The United States has had numerous presidents varying in political parties, beliefs, and ethical values. And in a country as diverse in race, religion, and culture as the U.S. is, it does not come as surprise that the country has yet to elect a president in which everyone supports. Every president has their flaws and every action of the White House is controversial and scrutinized. Martin Luther King Jr. once said “The ultimate measure of a man is not of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy”. With every presidency comes controversies which can define the legacy of that president and their impact on the country. Following more present day presidencies, President Donald Trump’s executive order on immigration is an extremely controversial topic around the world right now. Using an executive order President Trump has temporarily banned travel from seven countries.

The issue of illegal immigration has become a major debate for everyone. June Johnson wrote “Crossing Borders: Immigration” in her book Global Politics, Local Arguments to introduce the topic of undocumented immigrants in the U.S expanding and the measures that the government has taken to solve the problem. In Chapter 4, Johnson presented Victor Davis Hanson, who wrote “Illegal Immigration Is Immoral” to expose how the proposals to fix illegal immigration has lost all moral credibility. Krishnadev Calamur wrote “What Trump’s Executive Order on Immigration Does-and Doesn’t Do.” on Jan 30, 2017 in The Atlantic to expose the impact that Trump’s Executive Order 1187 to ban the citizens of seven Majority-Muslim

However, since President Trump was elected, the Bureau of Prisons has restored those contracts and ICE is proposing five new private detention centers -- in Detroit, Chicago, St. Paul, Salt Lake City, and south Texas.

Immigration in the United States has been long debated and never solved. Regardless of what is decided, there seems to always be a party who is not happy. With the recent election of the nation's next president, Donald Trump, the immigration debate has rekindled as a result of his radical immigration ideas. Today, there are an estimated 42.4 million immigrants living in the United States according to the Department of Homeland Security. This means that nearly 15% of the people currently living in the United States have immigrated here from another country in which they were born. Sure, fifteen percent doesn't seem like an overwhelming number to someone who is just simply looking at the numbers, especially if you point out that the United States

The travel ban that was imposed on January 27, 2017 restricted people from different nationalities from entering the United States for ninety-days. The United States should not implement this ban because this has already happened with the internment camps that the Japanese were moved after the attack on Pearl Harbor. The travel ban is facing problems with being imposed because the supporters and opponents are arguing to decide whether it is constitutional, racist, attacking the terrorism and if the national security protects it or not.

In today's world, the president of the United States holds the most important position with significant political power in other parts of the world. The president's job description expands further than the United States; he or she holds significant influence in the world. Furthermore, the position allows the president to shape foreign policy, which can affect global decisions such as immigration. For many decades, immigrants from around the world have come to help build America. For example, statistics show how working immigrants have increased the GDP as a result of their employment in the states. Nevertheless, immigrants have not always been welcomed to the country for several reasons such controversy has caused divide among Americans. Those who support banning immigrants cite social and economic drawbacks to the nation. While those who are in favor of immigration applaud their contribution to the nation's economy. Although immigration has some disadvantages, the United States benefits significantly from immigration and it needs control to foster these benefits.

The third article is about Trumps travel ban and how the Justice Department says that the president has some powers to act unilaterally when it comes to immigration and national security. The Justice Department urges the courts to allow Trump’s immigration order to go back into effect. While the opposing side says that the Trump overstepped by banning people from specific countries and of the Muslim religion. They also stated that Trump has violated core principles of the Constitution and ignored laws passed by Congress. Trumps goal for the travel ban was to improve the background checks to make sure terrorists are not admitted accidently. The order was blocked by the U.S. District Judge James Robart, the government appealed asking to reinstate

The article “Refugee Policy Should Be Based on Facts, Not Fear” from New York Times was written by Angelina Jolie. It focuses on the latest issue in the US, which is the travel ban, issued by President Donald Trump. The article focuses on the negative influence of the travel ban which affects the US and many others country around the world. For example, it will greatly affect the US values and beliefs because this decision will be contracted to the foundation of the country and show it is acceptable to deny vulnerable refugees using excuses … The article also shows that there is others way to solve the problem and reminds the America citizens of their value since the beginning. In conclusion, the article “Refugee Policy Should Be Based on Facts, Not Fear” is a good article that focuses on the travel ban’s issues.