The Pros And Cons Of The Lucknow Pact

After the disappointment of Simla gathering, Lord Wavell reported general and take common decisions after which sacred making body was to be set up. Emissary reported the development of official board with the backing of both Muslims and Hindus parties. Be that as it may, both sides dismiss the proposition. Quaid-e-Azam announced that Muslims were not prepared to acknowledge any settlement not exactly a different country for them and the All India Congress Committee described the proposition as dubious, deficient and unsuitable on the grounds that it had not tended to the issue of autonomy. In spite of this, both sides propelled decision battles. Since they realized that the decisions were crucial for the eventual

The general cause of the Indian Independence Movement was India’s desire for independence from British, French and Portuguese Rule. The aim of the movement was “Swaraj, a self-governing India” (Sharma, 2005, p. 22). One, more specific, cause of the Indian Independence Movement took place in 1905 when the province of Bengal was divided into two provinces,

In 1939 World War II broke out in Europe. Britain proclaimed India’s involvement in the war without consulting the Indian people. This led to increased protest and volatility. In 1942 India established a national army and proposed the Quit India Movement. This movement promised to lend Indian military support to Britain in return for complete independence. If they refused this treaty the Indian people promised civil disobedience. In 1947 India was granted its independence and became self governing (Luscombe, 2012). On January 26, 1950 the Republic of India was proclaimed and it drafted a constitution. The first democratic elections were held in 1952. However the Hindus and Muslims were not united and colonial India was divided into Muslim Pakistan and Hindu India (History, 2010).

There were conflicts in the early 1940s at religious events. An example is when the Hindu event Holi, also known as the festival of colors, featured riots. There were also cases when sacred cows were murdered. Additionally, there were times when Hindu music was loudly played by mosques during the prayer time. Segregation of the religions was promoted as Muslim’s could only use ‘Mohammedan refreshment room’ at train stations. Muslims could only use the tap waters labeled ‘Muslim water’ and Hindus could only use the taps labeled ‘Hindu water’. The president of the Muslim League, Muhammad Ali Jinnah, told a British interviewer, “We are different beings, there is nothing in life which links us together. Our names, our clothes, our foods-they are all different; our economic life, our educational ideas, our treatment of women, our attitude to animals….We challenge each other at every point of the compass”. Professor Mohammad Mujeeb from the distinct

The English were quick to inspire Indians to bolster the war exertion. In August 1940 the Emissary, Ruler Linlithgow, made an offer to the Muslim Class. He guaranteed that there would be no official conclusion on another constitution for India without the understanding of the Muslims. Be that as it may, he neglected to consent to equivalent or lion's share Muslim enrollment on the proposed Guard Chamber. The Muslim Group turned down the 'August offer' and the vast majority of its individuals surrendered their positions in the focal and common governments.

There are several instances in which Muslim Americans are discriminated against. The term "Muslim" used as a slur is "still acceptable in many parts of the country" and the fear that "Muslims are moving in and taking over" contribute to the prejudice and discrimination Muslims face. Such negative views, first observed in Khan's short narrative, are shown to be prevalent. These anti-Muslim sentiments discourage them from being politically invested because they are "concerned that public support from Muslims would hurt the candidate." Statistics further show the glaringly obvious absence of Muslim political activity compared to other religious groups, with only "51 percent of young Muslims are registered" as opposed to "78 percent of Protestants under 30 are registered." Muslim Americans are also severely underrepresented: "Currently, in the Senate, there are (...) no Muslim senators. In the House of Representatives, Keith Ellison, the first Muslim congressman in history, was elected in 2006 and was joined by the second, Andre Carsen, in 2008. By comparison, there are currently 33 Jewish and 14 Mormon Representatives." This data confirms the veracity of Khan's claims, that American political life is missing a Muslim presence, effectively convincing the reader of her truthfulness and position. The author is not making unfounded allegations, there is actual proof to support them, and facts cannot be

Source 15 is a statement made by Viceroy Linlithgow during discussions with Muhammad Ali Jinnah in August 1940, concerning arrangements for the wartime administration of India. In this source he is both for and

Specifically, it should be noted that under a single party rule, or under a stalemate of political disagreement where neither party would be able to advance their agenda, particular groups represented in the minority or counterculture would be treated at a disadvantage to the current culture or political system in demand. To develop a clear understanding of whether or not a lack of bipartisanship in Congress has an immediate effect on the minority which did not support the majority’s election and rise to power, it must be made evident that various social and judicial reforms do take place in order to support the empowerment of a single party despite the condition of its

Indians were becoming politically active in the late 1800s. During this period, they founded institutions that would help end colonial rule. In 1885, Indian modernists formed the Indian National Congress to reform Hindu and Muslim practices that did not match up to their liberal ideals and to change British Indian policies that were opposed to democratic ideals. However, many internal issues within the Indian culture were obstacles to independence. Most notably are the differences in language groups. Despite these problems, a nationalist movement took root within the country that ultimately led to the creation of India and Pakistan in 1947. There were three principles to this movement that helped the movement succeed.

In adjudicating upon the ambit of § 123(3), the Court by a majority opinion , adopted the purposive interpretation approach instead of a restrictive literal one, injecting a considerable might into the provision as well as embellishing its scope to formally and explicitly prohibit any appeal as may be made in the name of religion, caste et al to the populace during elections. In the analysis that follows, we shall dissect the qualitative aspects of the judgment in light of its intractable relation to the social realities that prevail. As Philip Allott observed : “Law establishes possible futures for society, in accordance with society’s theories, values and purposes.” In a nation often mired by societal conflicts based upon archaic classifications,

With the use of the practice of the Constitutional Convention and the process of specified speaking needed for such a meeting as well as others, it was learned that many people equal many opinions in which there must be a reach of compromise. Without the discussions between factions and the use of preparation and persuasion, confusion and a many of arguments would have been had. Therefore the discussions gave a sense of knowledge toward the problems given at hand and allowed a greater chance for possibilities. Although, in a Constitutional Convention the wants of each faction would be a little more direct and straightforward. However, the realization of the need for a change of thought may still happen. Of course the use of discussion with

At the turn of the century, many of Indians accepted their life under British rule. However, the racism and discrimination lead by the Europeans inspired Hindus to create a political

Gandhi was really concerned about the increasing divisions between the Hindu and Muslim's. He tried as much he could to prevent the partition between the Hindu and Muslim's. However the amount of success he had been trough this was very different and he did not achieve what he wanted. He was very disappointed about the separation between the Hindu and Muslim's. To prevent the

By the nineteenth century the Indian National Congress (I.N.C.) had been formed and were in union demanding equal opportunities from colonial rule. In attempt to counter out the increasing Hindu educated class, the British sought to make Muslims their allies. This failed but triggered Islamic feeling that in order to protect their culture in the increasingly Hindu I.N.C., believed the Muslims should have their own Islamic state.

A land already divided (to the point of even having been broken up) on religion lines, the last thing one needs in the country is the existence of a law or a body of laws, that actively lay down a different set of rules for people, on the basis of their religion. The Shah Bano case stands as evidence of the unfairness that can arise without a clear-cut separation between the judiciary and the legislation. One set of women (as illustrated in this case, followers of the Islamic religion in India) would have to give up certain rights that were granted to other women in similar circumstances, on the basis of something as arbitrary as the religion that they had been born