The Pros And Cons Of The Seventh Amendment

The Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution protects us to not be putted into cruel and unusual punishments, but when it comes to the death penalty, things become more complicated. In my personal opinion, I believe the absolute interpretation of the 8th Amendment and that the death penalty undoubtedly violates the 8th Amendment. Looking at the case of “Furman v. Georgia (1972)”, the Court invalidated death penalty laws in the end because the justices considered the punishment of the death penalty was too cruel and unusual to the Furman’ sin, accidentally killing people, and disproportionately using the death penalty would result in more serious problems to the poor and minorities. This decision fully reflected the reliability of

The Ninth Amendment is one of the most crucial in the Bill of Rights. It states, “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people,” (“A Guide to the Ninth” 1). As mentioned before, it

In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Eisenstadt v. Baird was a landmark decision by the US Supreme Court. It ruled in favor of unmarried couples using birth control. Griswold v. Connecticut provided the right for secrecy under the marital bedroom only, but not birth control on unmarried couples. The ruling was based it violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The argument was simple. The law which the defendants were penalized was a Massachusetts law of “Crimes Against Chastity”. Because it did not prosecuted marry couples due to buying, possessing, or using birth controls, it was discriminatory this law persecuted unmarried couples for it. Also it was ruled one of the defendants was exercising his freedom of speech, when distributing birth control. Therefore he could not be punished. Judge Brennan wrote in his opinion

The Seventh Amendment is truly a strong method to ensure that human rights are protected. Its importance might not be as obvious as that of the the First Amendment, with the three most known freedoms of religion, speech, and press, as well as freedom to assemble peacefully and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. However, this amendment helps to protect these freedoms, as without it power would be taken from the people and given unfairly to the government.

The Eighth Amendment, ratified in 1791, and it had three clauses. The clauses are Cruel and Unusual Punishment, Excessive Fines, and Excessive bail. The Cruel and Unusual Punishment means that the state and federal government restrict how extreme the punishment is to a person who has done a crime. This clause is made so that the people that are accused are not tortured and killed cruelly. The Excessive Fines restrict the state and federal government the amount of money a person fined for a crime. This clause created was so that the government cannot take a lot of your money away. The Excessive bail means that courts can’t give a tremendous amount of bond to a person who has broken the law. This clause created so that the judge and jury cannot already make their decision before the case even begins. This is why the saying “an accused is presumed innocent until found guilty” is established.

The Eighth Amendment is a wonderful thing, No cruel and unusual punishment, (written to spite Britain’s king) But where does the amendment stand in the world today? Proud and strong, or thrown in the hay? To answer this we can’t just look at one place,

The Ninth Amendment offers a protection to the American people, expressing that Americans have more inherent, fundamental rights beyond those that are listed in the Bill of Rights. Even though the first ten amendments to the Constitution were approved to ensure all citizens were granted the same basic freedoms all persons should have, the Ninth Amendment was instrumental in the foresight towards the future and enumerable rights. Though the Amendment was written out of concern that the Bill of Rights would not in fact cover fundamental human rights, the Amendment is still left to the courts to determine exactly what rights the Amendment does and does not protect. Despite many of the other Amendments within the Bill of Rights explicitly stating rights of the Federal Government and protections of the American people, the Ninth Amendment is more open-ended and left to the judgment of an enforcer.

During 1978, Alan Bakke was denied acceptance into the Medical School at the University of California. Bakke had a higher grade point average and higher test scores than other students who got accepted. Under the circumstances, Bakke stated he was denied acceptance because of his race. Not only did Bakke get denied because of his race, was a white male. Immediately he noticed and took the case to court. The Fourteenth Amendment of the US Constitution stated Bakkes rights being the Equal Protection Clause. (Bakke v. University of California)

The Eighth Amendment is intended to protect prisoners before they’re tried and after they’re convicted. It restricts excessive bail, fines, and cruel and unusual punishments. When looking back at laws from early America compared to the laws now, they were dramatically different regarding the death penalty. For example, in the 1600s, the Divine, Moral and Martial Laws, which provided the death penalty for even minor offenses such as stealing grapes, killing chickens, and trading with Indians, was proposed. Now, capital or first degree murder are typically the only offenses that will result in the death penalty as a punishment, where a couple hundred years ago people could get executed for simple, foolish offenses. Additionally, the Roper v.

Having the 6th amendment helps and protects us by giving us many rights. The 6th amendment has many different rights like A trial by a jury (in most cases) The jury to hear all of the witnesses and see all of the evidence Presence at the trial and while the jury is hearing the case and many more.

The government decided after several years that their comparative weak government under the Articles of Confederation, and proposed a new constitution on September 17, 1787. Hugh Williamson proposed a guarantee of trail by jury in the federal civil cases, but the motion to add this was not supported. The case didn’t go away since James Madison wanted to add the Seventh Amendment to the Bill of Rights. Congress proposed a revised version of the Seventh Amendment to the states on September 28, 1789, and by December 15, 1791, the necessary three-quarters of the states had ratified it. Also, “no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law”. It is against United

The seventh amendment covers the use of trial by jury. Trial by jury is used in federal court cases. It contains a panel of citizen that choose the verdict of the defendant. This amendment is part of the original bill of rights and was written to prevent prejudice in the courts. This amendment is still valid today; I'm glad it is still in use because it is a good way to a fair trial. There are many ups and downs to this method also.

I believe that knowledge of the fundamental principles which form the basis of our freedom and independence should be acquired by every person who benefits from American liberties and protection. The Declaration of Independence and The Bill Of Rights charter our freedom as an independent nation among “powers of the world.” Thomas Jefferson, aided by such great Americans as John Adams and Benjamin Franklin, wrote the Declaration of Independence. The Declaration states that all men are created equal and that God has given them the right to live, to be free, to work, and to be happy. The duty of the government is to secure these rights for the people but the government, however, must get its power from the consent or agreement of the people. Thomas Jefferson presented truths which form the principles of democratic government. Thomas Jefferson strongly believed that our Constitution must protect the rights of all Americans and one of those rights, to be protected, was the right to a jury trial. Thomas Jefferson once said, “I consider trial by jury as the only anchor yet imagined by man by which a government can be held to the principles of its Constitution.” I believe that the right to a jury trial is probably the most important right given to us in the Constitution. The right to trial by jury is one of the most frequently mentioned rights in the Bill of Rights. The founding fathers believed that the right to be tried by a jury of

-In 1968 the Supreme Court decided the Griswold case, stating that the government had no right to interfere in reproductive issues within a marriage.