The Pros And Cons Of The Toxic Substance Control Act?

Through the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), Congress directed EPA to regulate all aspects of hazardous waste. As a result, EPA developed strict regulations for the treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous waste. States may implement stricter requirements than the Federal regulations as needed. Treatment and Disposal: Any process that changes the physical, chemical, or biological characteristics of a waste to minimize its threat to the environment. Storage: The temporary holding of waste before the waste is treated,

In 1996 both houses of congress passed the quality protection act (FQPA) unanimously. This amendment particularly reformed regulations of pesticides. Eliminating the Delaney Clause from being applied to pesticide residues. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) website indicates that this new law sets a single health-based standard instead of the previous multiple standards. The general safety standard is considered to be, “a reasonable certainty of no harm.” When the EPA sets the standards it will have to take in consideration all sources, which include water, and other pesticides with a common “mechanism of toxicity” (http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/regulating/laws/fqpa/backgrnd.htm ). The website also mentions a special provision considering babies and children, where there is to be a clear determination that proves tolerance levels are in fact safe for children.

An area that could cause problems with the Controlled Substance Act would be how states set the laws concerning the use of recreational marijuana. States like Colorado who have laws that allow the use of recreational marijuana have certain limits on plant count, usable product, assistance, applying for a red card, transferring marijuana and privacy (Black, 2014). It has been shown that in Colorado that the Colorado’s Marijuana Enforcement Division has not yet ordered testing of the cannabis that has been grown for mold or any other contaminants or for

Also depicted in this paper is the type of cancers caused by each chemical and other related health problems associated with each chemical. Finally, the role of government agencies such as FDA, EPA and OSHA in preventing excessive amount or zero amounts of toxic chemicals from entering the environment will be discussed. The last paragraphs will enumerate the inferred conclusion from my research on Agent Orange, DDT and Benzene.

Also depicted in this paper is the type of cancers caused by each chemical and other related health problems associated with each chemical. Finally, the role of government agencies such as FDA, EPA and OSHA in preventing excessive amount or zero amounts of toxic chemicals from entering the environment will be discussed. The last paragraphs will enumerate the inferred conclusion from my research on Agent Orange, DDT and Benzene.

McBride Financial Services must control the risk of its use of toxic chemicals. “In its 2009 report Science and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment, the NAS recommended a process to address and communicate the uncertainty and variability inherent in a risk assessment…”

The United States should decriminalize drugs because it would keep people out of jail and stop overcrowding of jails, there are people with worst crimes that should be in jail. It will also stop wasting the taxpayers money, and it could increase the economy, also some states have already legalized drugs and the banning of drugs isn’t effective.

One of the first environmental protection laws included the federal law, primarily a procedural law that the government uses before taking of any action. It puts requirements when it comes to construction or impact the environment in some way. Environmental assessment: asses the impacts the proposed project could have on the environment. If nothing is found, then the law is discarded completely. However, if there was something that challenges the environment. The next step is the environmental impact assessment, this is done by researching scientifically and theoretically the extent that the project could have. This is required if the government wishes to proceed with the project, extensively, this does not mean that it has to comply with the recommendations of environmentalists and the findings of the research, but it must document it. The act was in response to the public’s demand in 1967 after an oil tanker in Great Britain

The EPCRA created a requirement for facilities to report both federally and locally certain quantities of hazardous substances (EPA, 2011). These reports are then used by the Local Emergency Planning Committees (LEPCs) and local fire departments to prepare for industrial accident emergencies. Local residents also have the right to know what chemicals are located within their communities and have the right to access some of this information (EPA, 2011).

Problems Addressed by the Statute: The Toxic Substance Control Act of 1976 (TSCA) was enacted in response to chemical exposure in the biosphere; of these exposures, some have been documented to severely affect and endanger an organism's health. Four years prior to this act being set as law, the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) had encouraged regulation of toxic chemical substances because the legislation at that time was not sufficient in managing these types of substances. Similar to OPA, many previous occurrences of harmful chemical exposures were not dealt with until after the event occurred and damages had already been administered. Once the federal government agreed with the CEQ’s proposal, TSCA was passed. TSCA mandates under the

The EPA stands for the Environmental protection agency. Their job is to protect the people and environment from anything that can be harmful that they can control. It makes sense that they want to ban all

This Act was established in 1976 and give EPA the authorizes to require reporting, record-keeping and testing requirements and restrictions relating to chemical substances and or mixtures. The EPA also control any of the substances that determined to cause unreasonable risk to the public health or the environment. The Act also address the production, importation, use, disposal of specific chemicals like PCBs, asbestos, radon and lead-based paint. However, there are some substance are excluded such as those among the food, drugs, cosmetics and pesticides.

Undoubtedly, the law is a crucial to public health. The enforcement of laws and regulations that protect environmental health and the ensure safety, and assure a competent environmental health workforce are two items in the essentials public health services ("EPHLI Core Essentials | EHS | CDC," n.d.) which refers to law and or policy further solidify the importance of law in public health. An example is Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) was passed by Congress and signed President Clinton on August 3, 1996 ("Summary of the Food Quality Protection Act | Laws & Regulations | US EPA," n.d.). The FQPA regulates the use of pesticide to safe levels that will not harm the environment and the people. This law is associated with the enforcement of

Legalization of drugs has become a huge discussion in the United States. The United States has been battling on the war on drugs. Whether to keep illicit drugs illegal or not. It has been going continuously about the benefits of legalization of drugs. However, illegal drugs should remain illegal. If illicit drugs are legalized, the United States would have more problems to deal with.

with prohibition of illicit drugs and the aftermath is shocking. For decades there has been