The Pros And Cons Of The Woolly Mammoth

Although bringing back extinct animals seem to concern only a small group of people it

De-extinction offers the possibility for extinct species to be brought back to life by reproductive cloning. Critics argue that de-extinction will reduce the will of society to protect endangered species, as well as harm the existing ecosystem upon species’ reintroduction. However, supporters argue that many species would be great candidates for de-extinction and will possibly be beneficial to the ecosystem. I will argue that de-extinction should not be pursued. I will argue that reintroduction of unextinct species could cause humanity to become disinterested in protecting endangered species due to the loss of finality of extinction. Furthermore, re-introduction of extinct species into ecosystems would negatively shift the balance, and may cause endangerment and potential extinction of otherwise unharmed populations.

“Opponents of bringing back extinct species think that it may make people less concerned about future environmental destruction” People would not half to worry about environment distractions if they bring back the Wooly Mammoth because it would make its environment healthy again. “De-extinction could offer insights into evolution and natural resources that are currently unavailable to us.” Even humans could get something out of bringing back the Wooly Mammoth such as resources that we don’t have right now that could help us in the

Think about this, you are wandering through a zoo and you hear they have a surprise exhibit opening. Now you as yourself being curious you wander over to this exhibit and see something you never thought you would see. In your mind all you’re thinking is “OH MY GOSH THERE’S A WOOLLY MAMMOTH THESE THINGS WENT EXTINCT CENTURIES AGO!” Now for starters that would be incredible and I’m going to tell you just how.

Conservations budgets are limited, assuming that the resurrection would be covered, maintaining the animals would be even more costly. A program to prevent the extinction of the Northern Rhino, will cost millions of dollars. A Wooly Mammoth would be even more because scientists know a lot of things about the Northern Rhino. Scientists are almost blind when it comes to the Wooly Mammoths. A study led by Joseph Bennett found that bringing back the Wooly Mammoth could lead to biodiversity loss rather than gain. In New Zealand, there is government funding for 11 extinct animals, and it might sacrifice triple the number of alive species. (Elena Motivans, 2017). Why would anyone want to risk the lives of our living Asian elephants when scientists don’t even know if this experiment will actually work. Spending all that money, and possibly killing another species is to big of a

Today, our society is changing so fast that we barely even notice it’s happening. Soon enough, our society will be able to do what the scientists in Jurassic Park did, and create copies of our “once exist” giants. But while science and technology evolves, we should be the ones to bring up the question not “if we can,’ but rather, “should we?” Dinosaurs are ravenous and dangerous creatures that could tear us apart into pieces, but if properly contained, could be a magnificent sight for many to view. Nature removed the dinosaurs from our planet by selection, but we can use our superior intelligence to play god through biological manipulation. In an article by Thomas Sumner and Bjorn Carey, they discuss the ethics of reviving dead species such as the ones in Jurassic Park, and denote that the technology is in our near future. “Twenty years after the release of Jurassic Park, the dream of bringing back the dinosaurs remains science fiction. But scientists predict that within 15 years they will be able to revive some more recently extinct species, such as the dodo or the passenger pigeon, raising the question of whether or not they should – just because they can” (Sumner and Carey).

According to another article called “5 Reasons To Bring Back Extinct Animals (And 5 Reasons Not To)” by Breanna Draxler, “De-extinction could be a big step forward for genetic engineering.” This means that if scientist can modify DNA to bring back extinct animals, it can help them achieve more with this great accomplishments. Furthermore, according to “Should We Bring Extinct Species Back From The Dead?” by David Shultz, “For decades the notion of “de-extinction” hovered on the scientific fringes, with new advances in genetic engineering.” To explain, when scientist were trying to find out how to bring extinct animals back to life, they discovered new things in genetic engineering that got them one step closer to actually modifying DNA and bringing back extinct animals. So the scientist were being very clever for trying. In addition, according to David Shultz, “researchers believe that it’s time to start thinking seriously about which animals we might be able to bring back, and which ones would do the most good for the ecosystems they left behind.” To explain, it shows here that scientist are being clever by thinking about which animals they should bring back and which ones they shouldn’t. Because they do need some of the animals to come back to life and help out the ecosystems. But others dont need to come back or shouldn’t come back because they could be a waste of time to the scientist or they could just be very

Imagine a world where all the animals we know today in the 21st century are replaced with the Ice age. From dinosaurs, Mammoths, Dados and even a Tasmanian Tiger. Movies like the, “Jurassic Park,” might become a creepy check. DNA and technology has taken scientist to the next level on bringing back extinct animals. Money is being wasted. The space and environment isn’t the same. Our animals today are at risk of becoming long-gone. Cloning extinct animals is not right. It doesn't balance our food chain and is unnatural.

The author chose to say that because you would really feel how it was like with giant dinosaurs and know what it would be like if they would eat the small animals if they would eat the the grass and there would be no more left but if we brought those back we would be able to find out we would be able to know what it feels like and maybe we would see how much it has changed our environment or not and the people would see what it's like to have those animals back and they but the bad thing it what if they start killing more because they know we can bring them back again. After

Mammoths Back? Here’s My Opinion Imagine if you could see mammoths walk the Earth again, do you think it would be a good idea? Scientists shouldn’t bring extinct animals back to life. Just think about how their habitat and atmosphere have changed, how much money it would cost, and the other animals/ the food chain.

Technology in today 's age has suggested that recreating extinct species is feasible. Development in this area brings up the questions of whether or not reintroducing extinct species is ethically and environmentally sound. Human expansion and invasion destroyed the lives of many creatures, and some people believe it is their obligation to return the species back to the wild. However, their habitat is no longer what it once was. Arguments are being made to bring back species that humans have inadvertently eradicated, but the opposition has a rebuttal for every argument that can be made.

George Church, the lead researcher working to de-extinction of the mammoth at Harvard, says that bringing back the mammoths could help convert the Arctic tundra back to the grasslands that existed during the last ice age. Reviving the mammoth could help slow climate change by shifting the landscape back toward the grasslands. This is the case for many other animals, with another example being the passenger pigeon, whose extinction was man made. After its species termination it caused forest fires and many other calamities. Bringing back this this animals and many more can help restore parts of the earth’s environment.

Most of the knowledge that we know about evolution is based on theories if we are able to bring back the extinct animals we can prove if our theories of evolution are correct.when we bring back animals it could provide us insight to the theories of evolution we can see if natural selection is right and if the theory of Inheritance of Acquired Characteristics is right.

Ultimately, the phenomenon of animals that are less attractive or appealing to the public being ignored is a greater reflection on society as a whole. Too often, it’s easy to overlook the “ugly” in favor of the more attractive option. In 2010, the UN released figures stating that anywhere from 150-200 species go extinct every day around the world, and while these numbers may vary, the general message is the same: we are losing animals at an alarming rate. In fact, scientists refer to the “Anthropocene” –the era of humans- as the sixth mass extinction. Most of the endangered species are ones that people have never heard of, but are nonetheless just as important to preserve as are pandas, dolphins, apes and other more sympathetic creatures. Witnessing this problem breaks my heart, and I want to do something.

Have you ever wondered what it would be like to walk with dinosaurs again? Well that could be more near than you think. De-extinction is the process of bringing back extinct species, such as the mammoth and the carrier pigeon. The articles “Should We Bring Back Extinct Species” by Joseph Bennett, “Last of His Kind”, and “We Might Soon Resurrect Extinct Species. Is it Worth The Cost?” by Steph Yin all explore the ideas of de-extinction. Scientist should not be permitted to bring back extinct species because de-extinction is too expensive and it could harm the ecosystem.