The Pros And Cons Of Welfare

There are 109,631,000 Americans on welfare, and only 105,862,000 full time working Americans. The fact that the amount of people on welfare outnumbers those who work, shows how our country is deteriorating. Some individuals on welfare take advantage of the system and exchange the things given to them, such as food stamps, for drugs or alcohol. I think anyone who does that should be taken off of welfare. In order to prevent that from happening in the future, I believe a system should be made. The system would determine whether an individual is deserving of government assistance or not. In order to be on welfare, there would be a drug test that has to be passed to even be considered. If passed, there would be quarterly drug tests that have to be passed in order to continue to get help from the government. There should also be a standard set that determines if the severity of the person’s disability is worthy of governmental assistance. If they meet all the criteria and pass their quarterly drug tests, then they deserve to be on welfare. Those who do not meet the criteria and are qualified to work, should get a job in order to support themselves and their

Changes within the welfare system as a result of policy shifts and by new thinking, more generally in the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), have had many methods, but the one that seemed most important, was that welfare recipients were required to do much more to justify their income support payments than before. The foundation of this new idea is that income support programs should allow individuals to maximise their participation in work. Due to the general shift in welfare administration, the number of activity test requirements an individual in Australia must meet in order to receive unemployment benefits, has expanded significantly since the early 1990s. This complex, overly bureaucratic process means that disadvantaged individuals cannot access the income support payments they require.

The welfare system first came into action during the Great Depression of the 1930s. Unemployed citizens needed federal assistance to escape the reality of severe poverty. The welfare system supplies families with services such as: food stamps, medicaid, and housing among others. The welfare system has played a vital role in the US, in controlling the amount of poverty to a certain level. Sadly, the system has been abused and taken for granted by citizens across the country. The welfare system was previously controlled by the federal government until 1996; the federal government handed over the responsibility to the states in hope of reducing welfare abuse. However, this change has not prevented folks from scamming the system. The

The United States welfare system should not support drug users because they are trying to get those people that need help, help. Therefore those people who are getting help from welfare should be bettering themselves and not hurting themselves. Drug testing should be mandatory, because this would be unfair to tax payers and other resources to support someone who abuses the benefit. Next, drug testing would benefit those who would need abuse treatment programs. Also, welfare should focus on families that would spend the money on necessities. Although welfare helps a lot of families, some use the money they receive to buy illegal drugs.

U.S. Welfare started as a federally funded program in the 1930’s during the Great Depression to help aid those families and individuals who had little to no income. The Federal Government was in charge of the U.S. welfare system for sixty years, until the 1990’s when there was an uproar of Americans who were unsatisfied with the way the Federal Government was handling those who were receiving government aid. Many Americans believed that these individuals were abusing the welfare program by “not applying for jobs, having more children just to get more aid, and staying unmarried so as to qualify for benefits.” (Welfareinfo, 2016) In 1996, the states were handed control of the welfare system due to the passed reform law signed by President Bill Clinton.

The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA) was one of the biggest legislation signed by Bill Clinton that focused on welfare. The main goals of this law were to lessen the dependency on federal government welfare while increasing employment and reducing poverty.

When the United States of America first began, there were small villages with men and women of varying degrees of wealth. Like any society, there were people who had little money and poor living conditions while others were wealthy. In the colonies of the new world, the church and the neighbors of those in poverty helped provide food and clothing, while also finding ways to improve their daily lives. These acts of kindness were an enormous help to the poor but sadly became less effective to those individuals as the population of the colonies increased along with the number of those in poverty. Soon seeing the streets filled with the poor the government of this new country decided that an improved method of help should be put into effect:

The extensive amount the government spends on welfare could easily be spent on more productive things. Not only that, but more has been spent on the war on poverty than the combined cost of all American wars ever. Which considering those go all the way back to the Revolutionary War, that is an absolute disgrace to this country and its citizens. All of this government spending gives people significant incentive to stay on welfare (3). Welfare is meant to be a temporary necessity, not a way of life. With the government money and state money combined, 10.3 trillion is disbursed on welfare (Bandow 2). It is estimated that welfare spending will increase from five to six percent GPA by the end of the decade (Gaiser 2). That is a preposterous amount and there is no reason for our country to spend so much money supporting people who choose not to work. Society would be a better place if people would put in an actual effort in life and not collect the money of those who

You’re invited to pull back the curtain on the ultimate façade that really needs to be exposed. You’ll find them at the nail shop and buying knock off Gucci out of the trunks of Monte Carlos in the parking lot at the Boulevard Mall. The glittering galaxy life of all your favorite Instagram stars and let’s not forget our very special guest, the cunning, the conniving county con artist that lives the lack luster lifestyle of the broke and stressed out. She is this paper’s unchallenged authority on doing it big on a budget and the fabulous food stamp life. She has been all over the country creating a lifestyle that Welfare critics will never stop talking about. A real life Cinderella that never went to the ball and never found her prince charming, America’s Welfare Queen.

The Welfare System’s Desperate Need for an Overhaul According to census.gov, 21.3 percent of people in the United States took part in the use of welfare programs each month in 2012 (Virginia Hyer, 2015). Even though the heart of the welfare system is genuine and pure, the heart of the most promising nation in the world has ultimately become too lazy to live a fulfilling life and dependent on the hard work of others to provide its needs. “The land of opportunity” has lost its passion; instead of chasing dreams and success, our nation seeks the easy way out of nearly every task especially in the workforce. Everyone wants to live a promising, financially stable life, but no one wants to work for it.

Welfare programs like Social Security, Medicare, SNAP, TANF, and Medicaid, do cost the federal government billions of dollars. Clearly cutting costs to these programs would be the best way to save money and or put it elsewhere. However, the programs that cost us the most (Social Security and Medicare) are untouchable while SNAP, TANF, and Medicaid are not. The agreement against these programs is that they cost too much and are abused by those who use it. If it is true that people abuse it then it is clear that funding needs to be cut and the abusers punished. Many believe these programs should be stricter and should focus on helping people get jobs instead of encouraging them to not get jobs. Overall those against welfare programs don’t want

Examining welfare in the United States it always seems to be a complex and controversial subject. Welfare is directed at various aspects of public policy such as economics, education/training, culture diversity, taxation, incentives, actualization as well as the actual role of the government. The paper will commence by briefly discussing the idea of state welfare system, the origin, development, purpose, and specific view on the way welfare system has undergone changes from the error of Depression. This therefore brings us to the importance of having knowledge on the implication of the 1988 Family Support Act (FSA), the attitude change and policy concerning welfare, as well as the most recent way of focusing to the finding methods of training, retraining or educating individuals in welfare for them to get gainful employment especially those who move to the corporate world.

Welfare: handouts to the lazy, or a helping hand to those facing hard times? The debate continues, even in the face of sweeping welfare reform, which, for all of its sound and fury, has not helped or changed much. What's wrong with welfare and how can we fix it? This is not a simple question, and there is no simple answer. However, one thing remains eminently clear. Welfare desperately needs to change. But where are we now? Are we headed backward or forward? Does anybody even care? To answer these questions, we must catch a glimpse of the world of welfare.

The federal welfare system is a group of program provided by the federal government to give aid to the poor. The federal welfare system was first introduced by President Theodore Roosevelt. Since then, welfare programs have expanded to give health care, houses and food to people in need. The welfare programs were designed to aid the poor, elderly, and disabled, but actually led to higher taxes and abuse of the system. These effects led to calls for reform. Reforms caused more damage than good. The public welfare system needs to be mended by reducing federal and state spending on welfare systems, promoting work for the unemployed and a health care reform.

The United States government had established many programs that provide assistance for unemployed or underemployed individuals and their families. Currently assistance is provided through several avenues including cash assistance, Medicaid, and supplemental nutrition programs.