The Pros Of Constricter Gun Control Laws

What gun control laws are going to help stop mass shootings? Even if the government banned the sale of assault rifles and guns in general,people with bad intentions are going to purchase them illegally. In the three recent mass shooting that caused many deaths, the shooters got their guns illegally with no trace of the sale on these weapons. Sandy Hook,Columbine,and San Bernardino were all mass shootings where the shooters got their guns illegally, stole the gun from family members or other people, and caused a lot of danger and harm to people. There would be no regulations to stop them because even if there were stricter gun laws, they still would be able to purchase their guns illegally.Stricter gun laws will not prevent crime,people will still get illegal firearms,and no sales to the public will reduce revenue.

I think that there should be more gun control laws because it can help in the future. Even though many people already own guns and they can't be taken away because of the Second Amendment, it can prevent those who shouldn't own a gun from buying one. Implementing more laws would make it harder to own a gun, which can prevent many attacks and deaths. Even though more gun control laws won’t eliminate attacks are mass shootings completely, it will help lower the number of attacks and save more lives. Having these laws may not seem like it can do much now, but it will make it harder to get a gun in in the future and lower the chances of it falling into the wrong hands.

Gun Control is very controversial many people believe that there is nothing wrong with the gun control laws in place right now. The Republican Party and The Democratic Party has different views on Gun Control. Many tragedies have occurred such as school and mass shootings. This year gun-related shootings have increased. The Second Amendment is the right to bear arms which can be interpreted differently by others. Specifically, the 2nd Amendment states A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. Gun Control Laws should be strict throughout all states in order to insure the safety of others.

Gun Control has been a controversial issue in the United States for a long period of time. There are two sides to this debate, the pro-gun lobbyist who believe they should have the right to exercise the 2nd Amendment right which states that the Federal Government does not have the right to infringe the people from keeping and carrying a firearm. The Anti-gun lobbyist wants stricter run regulation or even ban gun sales all together. This essay will be analyzing the laws regarding gun regulations through the history of the United States. The essay will also look into the 2nd Amendment rights while also giving it a definition. This essay will also be analyzing some of the more important Supreme Court cases in which the ruling of the Supreme Court

“Guns don't kill people; people kill people.” With the United States having the highest gun ownership rate in the world, controversial conversation arises between two groups of people: pro-gun and pro-gun control. Gun control laws should be much more stern as it could decrease gun fatalities in public mass shootings, defeat gun purchasing loopholes, and promote general peacefulness, so that Americans will feel safer.

With more and more people starting to get fed up with all of the gun control laws, the question is, should gun control laws become more lenient or should they become more strict? First point is that people kill people not the guns. Second, people should be able to use guns as they like without breaking the law plus the gun control laws don’t deter crime. Last, if guns are getting taken away then other things should be taken away too that some may not even think about.Many people think that they should be more lenient and that is a very valid side of the story.

What makes people think laws are going to stop all the madness? Mass shootings happen everywhere but nobody can stop them. Passing gun control laws are not going to stop the shootings. People break the law all the time and must of them never get caught. Within all the mass shootings that have gone on and with all the gun laws that are already out, adding more would not be a good idea because the people would not get the reaction that they want. People would just complain more about the laws and the outcome would steady be the same.

in addition,if the gun control laws were strict that would not be the reason for death.

85% of Americans say that they favor making background checks for buying guns stricter. 88% of Democrats and 79% of Republicans support this cause (Dent). Despite this fact the background checks are still debated by the government, while everyday more people are getting their hands on dangerous weapons. Gun control laws need to be stricter to prevent mass shootings and other violent crimes with high powered guns.

Should gun control laws be implemented or not? The United States has about 90 guns per 100 people, or about 300,000,000 guns, which is the highest number in the world. Gun control laws should be enacted but there are more cons then pros about the gun control act of the government.

It will come as no surprise to learn that the United States has the highest rate of gun ownership in the Western World. In fact, the United States is described as a place with its own unique culture around firearms (Kohn, 2004). Given the violence associated with firearms, it behooves policy makers to come up with sound policies that will allow individuals the freedom to exercise their constitutional right as contained in the 2nd Amendment, while maintaining law and order in the society. Laws that regulate firearms in this case, come in two forms. There are those that protect the use of firearms for self-defense, sport and hunting, and those that restrict the access to, and/or use of firearms. There has been a great devotion

Gun control is the set of laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification, or use of firearms by civilians. The debate over gun control has come up for debate across the United States after two mass shootings rocked the country. The common argument for gun control is that gun control works. When simply in reality that argument is invalid because when you limit guns or even take them away in some cases the murder rate rises. Not only does gun control not work but the laws are racist and gives the government to much power. The idea of gun control infringes on the rights of citizens and takes away their safety.

Over the years there have been many debates about whether or not gun control is a good solution for the United States. As a result, two very distinct sides have formed: one for gun control and one against it. Recently, the pro gun control side has argued that the many school shootings were partly a result of our country’s minimal gun control. To many this may seem like a reasonable argument, but in reality it is an overgeneralization; there are many other factors that play a part in horrific events like school shootings. Those against gun control have argued that gun control laws are a violation of citizen’s constitutional rights often saying things like, “to take away the right to have guns is no different from the attempt of the British to “disarm” the colonists during the Revolutionary War” (Hanson 68). But which side is right? Many would say that neither side is completely correct, but when the facts are presented it is obvious that gun control is not a good solution because “guns don’t kill people, people kill people”, self-defense is the number one reason for owning a gun, and because the gun control laws that are being instituted do not work (Zimring 13).

According to gun advocates, “If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns” (Stossel). Many people including government officials and American citizens question whether the gun ban across the nation will actually reduce the overall violence or will it take a turn for the worse by creating a rebellion. In the past, the threat of taking guns away created an uprising in a group of outlaws’ rage and fury. There was a murderous killing spree that occurred in Oregon in the month of October that was a result of the gun control laws being put in place. No matter how many people have their guns taken away, American criminal’s sick obsession for violence will never be abolished. For this and many other reasons, there needs to be less gun control.

Gun control has been a people issue for decades, and the fight for or against it is getting stronger with each coming year. From the Columbine shooting to the most recent Santa Fe High School shooting, it seems as though guns are the perpetrator. The greatest defense against gun control is the Second Amendment, which states, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” John Paul Stevens, a 98 year old former associate justice suggested that America should repeal the Second Amendment, sparking controversy amongst liberals and conservatives. But should the Second Amendment actually be repealed? Should America ban guns completely to limit gun crime? Simply