The Psychological Theory Of Motivation

Having motivation to do something is very important. Motivation plays a huge roll in everyone’s life, even If someone has very little motivation. There are several types of motivation such as Instinct and drive motivation. These two motivations are quite similar, but different at the same time. I will compare and contrast both of these types of motivation and what I think about them. These motivations are very important to your life and can determine an outcome of your life.

Maslow (1943) sets out to provide a theory as to why we as individuals become motivated to satisfy our basic needs and seek to fulfill other needs once the previous ones have been satisfied. He developed a concept called the hierarchy of needs, which he uses to interpret the different levels of needs individuals acquire. This theory is of importance as it provides reasoning and structure for the fulfillment of our everyday needs. After describing the five needs, the author talks about the pre-conditions that must be met in order to satisfy basic needs. Further discussion of characteristics pertaining to the theory will lead into the degree of fixity of the hierarchy.

Throughout my 5 years of college and high school in the U.S, this is the first psychology class that I have taken. This class has helped me understand concepts of the human mind, such as intelligence, problem solving, and differing personalities. These lectures are supported by various scientists and psychologists, and are relevant to real life circumstances. However, the most valuable lesson I have learned in this class is motivation.

Motivation is defined as the ‘process that initiates, guides and maintains goal-oriented behaviors.’ Motivation (arousal by internal energy) is what makes a person want to press forward and achieve their aspirations. Ormrod (2008) shares the need for arousal and refers to the basic need for stimulation

According to DuBrin, “…motivation is an energizing force that stimulates arousal, direction, and persistence of behavior” (2004, p. 121). It is the force inside the individual and process which allows us to get others to put forth effort. There are many motivational theories that can be used to motivate others (DuBrin, 2004).

Motivation is the act of stimulating someone or oneself to get a desired course of action or to push the right bottom to get a desired reaction.” Michal, J. Jucius Motivation is a process of inducing, inspiring and energizing people to work willingly with zeal, initiative, confidence, satisfaction and an integrated manner to achieve desired goals. It is a moral boosting activity.

Motivation can be described as the needs and wants that guide our behaviour towards a goal or purpose. Motivation can also be seen as a movement to a behaviour, or a cause to repeat a certain behaviour (Rani & Sameer, 2012). Three stand-out theories of motivation are the Drive-Reduction theory, the Incentive theory, and the Evolutionary theory or Instinct theory. The Drive-Reduction theory looks at the homeostasis of an individual and states that the motivation of said individual greatly depends on the discomfort experienced due to homeostatic imbalance. The Incentive theory uses positive reinforcement to create a stimulus; motivation is then based off this incentive, driving an individual towards a goal or action. The

The term motivation is derived from the Latin word movere, meaning "to move." Basically motivation is a force which is acting on or within a person that cause the arousal, direction, and persistence of any goal. Motivation theory is thus concerned with the processes that explain why and how human behavior is activated.

Stress and conflict in the workplace can cause major emotional and physical damage to the facility and workers. In the past, there have been reports of tragedies caused by disgruntled workers who may have clocked in with a gun in hand. We are going to look into ‘three motivational theories including the relationship of stress and conflict in relation to individual motivations.’

Frame the context for understanding the concept of motivation, particularly who and what motivates employees;

‘Motivation’ is derived from the Latin term ‘movere’ that means ‘to move’. Thus, motivation is a process that starts with a physiological or psychological deficiency or need that activates a behaviour or a drive that is aimed at a goal or incentive (Luthans). Broadly speaking, motivation is willingness to exert high levels of efforts towards organizational goals, conditioned by the efforts’ ability to satisfy some individual needs (Robbins). Need means some internal state that make certain outcomes appear attractive. An unsatisfied need creates tension that stimulates drives within the individual. These drives generate a search behaviour to find particular goals, that if attained,

The word motivation was derived from Latin words “mover” which simply means to move (Kretiner, 1998). Motivation is a predisposition to behave in purposeful manner to achieve certain unmet needs (Buford et.al 1995). Moreover, motivation can also be described as a drive internally to satisfy unsatisfied needs (Higgins, 1994). Motivation is a psychological process that makes an employee behaves in a purposeful manner and direction (Kreitner, 1995). Robins (1993) defined motivation as willingness to put

This case study discusses the theory of motivation as forces within an individual that account for the direction, level, and persistence of a person’s effort used at work. According to Schermerhorn, Osborne, Uhl-Bien, and Hunt (2012), the research of Motivational Theories is divided into two types of theories, content and process theories. Content theories focus on physiological and psychological deficiencies while process theories of motivation to focus on how cognitive processes as thoughts and decisions with the minds of people influence their behavior. In this case study we will focus on the process theories (p. 102). We begin with a woman named Mary Jones, while she was in the last year of college, she was interviewing for jobs. Mary graduated in the upper part of her class and she was highly respected by her instructors. Being in the top one percent of her class she was offered positions in every corporation she had an interview with. After thinking over several offers, she began working for Universal Products, which was a global company. Along with Mary, Susan Stevens was a recent hire, also working for the same manager. Despite both had the same qualifications, Sue somehow had the advantage. Mary had a great attitude before she met Sue, she held the company in respect and was actually proud of working for Universal. Moreover, her contribution in the company was being valued and she was given inspiring projects which

Having grown up as the youngest of three boys, each of whom had vastly different educational experiences, I have always been intrigued with the concepts and methods of motivation. My two older brothers were adopted in 1970 and 1972 and when my mother “accidentally” got pregnant with me in 1974, my parents were destined to raise three boys with three completely different genetic and psychological make-ups. My oldest brother failed to make it out of eleventh grade despite scoring high on aptitude tests. He had significant behavioral issues and was constantly in trouble with the law. My middle brother had mild dyslexia and emotional problems that later in his adult life was diagnosed as ADHD. Looking back, low self-efficacy and learned helplessness was rampant in the psychology of my brothers within the classroom. Schoolwork was a major struggle and they failed to place value on success or failure. They were not motivated to perform in school despite being raised in a supportive, loving family. And so I have always wondered, why? Did their teachers accept their habituation as laziness and fail to explore different motivating techniques? Could my parents have done more? Why are some children more motivated than others?

Nowadays it is widely accepted that the most important resource of any company are its employees; therefore competent manager need to have the clear understanding what motivates their subordinates to achieve effective performance as from efficiency of their work the success of the organization depends. Consequently, the task of manager consists in as much as possible effectively to use personnel opportunities. In independence on the manager decision the effect from it can be received only in case if this decision would successfully be embodied in the employees’ affairs. And it can occur only in case if workers are interested in results of the work. For this reason, it is necessary to motivate the person, to induce to action.