The brilliant and hilarious mind behind The Psychopath Test is a man by the name of Jon Ronson. Much more than just the author of this single work, Ronson has also written over six other books, including The Men Who Stare at Goats, which has been made into a film in recent years. Aside from writing books, Jon Ronson works as an investigative journalist and writes about some of the oddest happenings in the world. Although he is foreign born, Wales to be exact, he presently lives in New York with his family.
The bulk of the book revolves around the mysterious enigmatic topic psychopathy and how it is essentially all around us; in the highest places and the lowest, inside the best and worst of us, and a bit in the core of us all. The history of psychopathy goes back to the beginnings of civilization itself, but its treatment and study began to take of in the late 1800’s and reached its peak in the mid-1900’s. Ronson dedicates many pages of The Psychopath Test
…show more content…
Ronson is not only, in many cases, presenting you with the story of his own journey with psychotherapy and his research into it, but also presenting you with knowledge and facts on psychopaths, as well as the stories of other individuals rather than always having the focus be on him. However, when the spotlight does shine his way, Ronson does not fail to enthral and entertain. His writing is incredibly easy to follow, and he refrains from using complicated language or allowing his writing to get too uninteresting, often by adding jokes whenever he can. Although, the most intriguing aspect of his writing is that it, ultimately, reads much like a novel, something that is very helpful in a nonfiction piece of writing. Ronson uses his skills in journalism to write a book that gives the reader facts and history, while at the same time giving an interesting and playful
Accordingly, there exists a small group of people who exhibit most-to-all of these specific and peculiar characteristics and behaviours. This particular group of predators presents numerous challenges to morality, safety and policy. For instance, because a "psychopath" may display a general coldness toward others, they are more likely to commit criminal acts, and afterward not respond to punishment or deterrent tactics. Hare’s psychopathy checklist when used as a tool to identify psychopaths prevents harmful exposure of non-psychopaths to this dangerous group of offenders. For this tool to work effectively there must not be significant overlap of the specific characteristics used in the PCL-R to identify psychopaths as in the general population of non-psychopaths. In other words, the psychopath must
He described, clarified and captivated the personality traits and socially deviant behaviors of a psychopath. Importantly, this book served as a “guide” in knowing how to protect oneself if ever cross-paths with a psychopath.
“Psychopathy is a personality disorder characterized by an inability to form human attachment, aggressive narcissism, and antisocial behavior defined by a constellation of affective, interpersonal and behavioral characteristics, most of which society views as pejorative” [1]. Some of these characteristics include irresponsibility, grandiosity, cunning, deceitfulness, selective impulsivity, sexual promiscuity, lack of empathy, etc. People who are psychopathic display not only antisocial behavior but also emotional impairment such as the lack of guilt. They are able to prey on others using their charm, deceit, violence or any other methods that allow them to get what they want. A strong feature of most of the behavior
Psychopathy, in both the mental health and criminal justice systems, has emerged as one of the most important clinical constructs of the 21st century (Hare, Clark, Grann, & Thornton, 2000, p. 623). Where clinically, psychopathy is traditionally described as a combination of inferred socially deviant behaviors and personality traits. Some traits and behaviors a psychopath is seen to possess are commonly known, for example, to being impulsive, selfish, aggressive, lacking remorse, shame, feeling for others, pathologically lying, and having asocial or antisocial behaviors (Hare, & Neumann, 2006, p. 59-60). One of the reasons as to why psychopathy has come to see an increase in the development of its theoretical and applied interest is the
The Psychopath Inside The memoir The Psychopath Inside by James Fallon begins with a shocking revelation: on page three, the author explains that his brain scans indicate he is a psychopath. After the initial disbelief wears off, the story quickly delves into Fallon’s history and current life. The book is extremely detailed with a high level of sophisticated language, resulting in an intriguing storyline that keeps the reader engaged. All aspects of the Deerfield High School curriculum considered, The Psychopath Inside warrants inclusion in the curriculum of psychology courses, specifically AP Psychology.
The media’s focus on the highly publicized trials of notorious mass murders, such as Ted Bundy, Jeffrey Dahmer, and Ted Kaczynski has spurred society’s fascination with psychopaths. Hollywood’s consistent production of films portraying psychopaths, like Silence of the Lambs and American Psycho, is illustrative of the public’s removed curiosity with the mad. Psychopathy, a misunderstood behavioral disorder, traverses the fine line between the mentally ill and the evil. Unfortunately, the perceptions established through popular media prejudice our overall ideologies on the mentally ill, specifically those suffering
This book uses the concept of psychopathy as a way to understand crime. Dr. DeLisi uses hundreds of studies and his own work, plus his own experience of working with antisocial and violent offenders to make this book. Dr. DeLisi then demonstrates how psychopathy explains all sorts of crimes. Dr. DeLisi’s extensive work will help people further research into psychopathy. An with that it will help people better understand crime
When we look at how fragile each one of our lives are, we need to take a minute and realize the different characteristics that form us into who we are today. Studies have shown that there are characteristics within the behavior of an individual that can be linked to the specific behaviors demonstrated by an offender that would classify them as a psychopath. Along with other research that looks into an individual’s genetics to see if that plays a role in defining or making a psychopath. John Allen Muhammad, also known as the D.C. sniper, was labeled as a psychopath when he terrorized D.C. for two weeks, taking thirteen victims and killing ten of them. This paper will go over the behaviors that constitute psychopathy, and the behaviors that
Within the streamlined boundaries of today’s society, many find amenity in discussing their unrest with those who can lessen it or resolve it completely. Similarly, when the burden is too great, those with apprehensions about their mental state are welcomed into psychiatric facilities designed to rehabilitate their patients to their full potential. Psychopathy is defined by a select grouping of symptoms while the classification of psychopaths has changed substantially over the last 60 years, largely by Dr. Robert Hare. Randle McMurphy, One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest’s protagonist displays a combination of psychopathic tendencies and inclinations of those not needing psychiatric care. Within the 1960s definition of a psychopathic individual
This article states that we need to stop interchanging psychopath and sociopath, as they are two different disciplines. Pemment goes into detail about the history, research, and growth of psychopathy. He says that we need to understand the difference between the two, as the behavioral characteristics and potential treatments for each are different. The article includes details on Hervey Cleckley and Robert Hares work on psychopathy. The article describes the PCL-R, and how Hare says the test should be done. The PCL-R is used as a screening tool to identify psychopaths, and
Of all the psychiatric disorders, none are more chilling to the world then the psychopaths and sociopaths. These two disorders, categorized as antisocial personality disorders, bring about the absolute worse people and killers that the world has ever known. The infamous serial killers, the people who do the unimaginable, were all psychopaths. The ability of these people to do what they do and know that what they are doing is wrong, is perhaps one of the most chilling and shocking characteristic of these people. Psychopaths and sociopaths are very often thought by most to be the same disorder, yet they are different when classified by many psychiatric researchers. The people classified as psychopaths and sociopaths are separated by one main difference, and that is if they were born with a lack of the ability to empathize or if they were affected as children in a traumatic environment. Although both of these horrible disorders derive from a different area, the reality is that they are unpredictable, undetectable and most importantly, they can be very dangerous.
The concept of psychopathy originated in the 1800s to describe individuals that consistently failed to conform to societal norms and exhibited antisocial behavior that did not fit the concept of mental illness of the time period. While, psychopathy was a common term used to describe individuals suffering from this disorder other descriptions were coined such as “Pinel’s term “manie sans delvie” meaning mania without delirium in the 1700s, to describe patents whose ‘affective faculties were disordered’” or Pritchard’s term “moral insanity” (Ogloff 520). In the 1930’s Partridge argued that psychopathy was a social rather than a mental disorder and proposed that the concept of sociopathy be introduced as a more accurate description. The American Psychological Association adopted Partridge’s term for their Diagnostic and Statistical Manuel in 1952. However, in 1968 the American Psychological Association changed the diagnostic label from sociopath to “personality disorder, antisocial” for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manuel – II that continued through to the DSM - III in 1980 and the DSM - III-R in 1987 and the DSM - IV in 1994. Today the Diagnostic and Statistical Manuel categorizes antisocial personality disorder as a personality disorder and it is named as such. Unfortunately, not much research has been conducted
“The Psychopath is Not Mentally Ill, He is Evil.” Is a quote delivered to us as a hate-filled phrase. The philosophy behind ‘evil’ and the opinions which stem from that school of thought will not be explored in this essay, for the sake of the word limit and other time related constraints, also not being mentioned is the argument behind what psychopathy is or is not, the assumption for this work is that psychopathy is a mental illness. This essay will focus on the reasons why people think so poorly of people with psychopathy, mainstream media, the type and quality of the information that is accessible to the public and how this has led to the stigmatisation of psychopathy and the act of ostracising psychopaths. This is to be investigated by a number of books, research and journal articles which all point to the same thing, various levels of discrimination that happen because of how psychopaths are represented in the media, because of capitalism and the lack of resources that say anything to the contrary, and how we as a society can remedy this situation.
Introduction The purpose of this study is to compare and contrast the constructs of psychopathy and antisocial personality disorder. The aim is to highlight whether the terms psychopathy and antisocial personality disorder reflect the same construct or whether they differ. Furthermore, recommendations for treatment of criminal behavior will be explored. For the purposes of this evaluation some definitions need to be highlighted: Criminal offence is an act that breaks a law, which relates how to behave in society. The harm caused by the act is seen to be against society as a whole, not just a specific person. Sometimes it refers to the specific law that was broken (Herring, 2009). Crime is the breach of rules or law for which some authority
The social sciences often question if psychopathic behaviour is innate or a product of a social environment. In the movie Psycho by Alfred Hitchcock, Norman Bates’ downfall proposes how crucial a healthy childhood is to the mental state of a developing child. Contrary to nature focused beliefs, not all human behaviour comes from an individual’s genetic makeup, but rather through experiences that become ingrained in the mind like scripture (Cooke 25). Theories proposed by Sigmund Freud and other research comparing the relation between psychopathy and environment can help to rationalize the reasons behind Norman Bates’ unsuccessful childhood, the impact of his parent-child relationship on his self-perception,