The Public And Political Space Essay

Starting during the 1970s, factions of American conservatives slowly came together to form a new and more radical dissenting conservative movement, the New Right. The New Right was just as radical as its liberal opposite, with agendas to increase government involvement beyond the established conservative view of government’s role. Although New Right politicians made admirable advances to dissemble New Deal economic policies, the movement as a whole counters conservativism and the ideologies that America was founded on. Although the New Right adopts conservative economic ideologies, its social agenda weakened the conservative movement by focusing public attention to social and cultural issues that have no place within the established Old

The basis of criminal justice in the United States is one founded on both the rights of the individual and the democratic order of the people. Evinced through the myriad forms whereby liberty and equity marry into the mores of society to form the ethos of a people. However, these two systems of justice are rife with conflicts too. With the challenges of determining prevailing worth in public order and individual rights coming down to the best service of justice for society. Bearing a perpetual eye to their manifestations by the truth of how "the trade-off between freedom and security, so often proposed so seductively, very often leads to the loss of both" (Hitchens, 2003, para. 5).

Progressive Era reformers such as Theodore Roosevelt, Jane Addams, and W.E.B Dubois were largely successful in prompting national reform in issues regarding direct democracy, social equality, and economic regulations through the use of political power, public pressure/opinion, and muckraking however, the progressive change was not met without resistance as multiple political and social belief obstacles prevented such progress, but the overall impact of the Progressive Era was its lasting success.

It was a time for change in America in all walks of life, as well as a time for

The Progressive Era was a period that exposed the contradictions found in American society in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century. Theodore Roosevelt summed up the Progressive/Reform feeling in his "Square Deal" speech - that it was all about morals, not economics. His goal was the "moral regeneration of the business world." He preached that it was wrong for some people to get ahead in business and politics by tricks and schemes, while others were cheated out of the opportunity. This was the kind of talk that millions of Americans from all areas of society could understand and respond to.

Sir Edmund Burke once said “But what is liberty without wisdom and without virtue? It is the greatest of all possible evils; for it is folly, vice, and madness, without tuition or restraint.” (Burke). Although this was stated about hundred years before the progressive era, it shows the importance of morals for producing a great society. Creating a good and moral society was an important goal for the Progressives of early 20th century, and they used the law to create such a society. Many of these goals were good and noble, however, these activities increased the size and scope of the government. The progressives goals, although often noble, produced actions that tread the thin line between promoting a better society and creating a nanny state.

Have you ever thought about why you have the political beliefs and values you do? Where did they come from? Are they simply your own ideas and experiences or have you been influenced by others in your thinking? This process by which individuals acquire their political beliefs and attitudes is called political socialization. In another words, Political socialization is a concept where the study of the developmental processes by which children and adolescents acquire political cognition, attitudes and behaviors. What people think and how they come to think it is of critical importance to the stability of the government. The beliefs and values of the people are the basis for a society's political culture and that culture defines the

The article I have chosen is called “Roadside tests for pot need to rethink before legalization, say defence lawyers”. It is written by Laura Glowacki from CBC News on April 16, 2017.

I think the people have the power in the U.S because, the people are the voice of America and they can be the change that America needs and wants. The people also choose the leader of the Country either Republican or Democrat and the 2 other parties of Libertarian and Green Party. Another thing is that people want more unity for Americans and then finally to let the states make their own laws so they won’t be enraged with the U.S Government and they could work out the law making with the Congress. The people are the change that america wants but nobody is going to say anything.

The question is whether or not businesses, or other organizations have the right to contact and lobby government. According to Steiner, G. et al (2011), the First Amendment to the United States Constitution gives all Americans those rights. The writers explain that the First Amendment gives us free speech. We have the right to speak our minds and criticize our government if we choose to do so. The First Amendment gives us Americans a free press. In other words the government cannot pick and choose which news stories they want covered, and they cannot tell the press how to cover them. The First Amendment gives us the right to form groups such as business organizations or labor unions. The First Amendment gives Americans the right to contact and lobby government. In other words Americans have the right to go before congress and other government officials, and present their side of any issue.

Based on the U.S. National Debt each American citizen contributed debt is $47,724.00. This does not mean that we are accruing debt our self this is a representative number of how much debt is comparison to all the American citizens (US Debt, 2011). According to the U.S. Social Security Office the average income for an American citizen is $41,673.83 (Social Security Administration, 2011). Although these statistics are loosely based the average is a sample. One could argue it is not accurate to the current economic standings although the debt values are. This explains why currently the approval rating for Congress is below 20% according to the new Gallup polls (Gallup, 2011). The Washington Post posted an article called, Poll:

The perception of individual-rights and public-order is quite an interesting controversial double-sided choice in which discussions are to agree or disagree on the US PATRIOT Act. Ever since the PATRIOT Act was issued by George W. Bush to prevent potential terroristic catastrophes has been a controversial concept that surrounds different perspectives. For example, section 206 within the PATRIOT Act, authorizes roving wiretaps in electronic devices (phones, PC, computers, systems, etc.). People argue that it is a violation of the fourth Amendment to have the government (NSA) monitor and see what goes on the digital world. Although, it is true that the government can see everything in the digital world; it does not mean that privacy is compromised. Privacy does not exist anymore in today’s

Furthermore Marx Weber argues that public service is naturally a political foundation and thus cannot be made fully apolitical. (Matheson, 2007).When Bureaucrats deliver a public service to the people they unavoidably take part in the political role of determining who gets what from the public sector and who does not (Matheson, 2007). Also to add on that lobbying has risen over the years, there are extra layers of political elected people even in countries that already hold numerous politically selected echelons like USA. Hence it booms a growing contribution of political performers in duties which usually are played by bureaucrats. (Matheson, 2007)

=The interactions between the economy and the political field are very important to one another for they truly do have a major influence on what each does. Specifically, capitalism and democracy or a republic have major influence on each other as they both create a certain type of environment that for better or for worse affects the other. Namely the effect of private property on the nature of political life in a republic as well as the participation in that political life. Jean-Jacques Rousseau in The Social Contract and The Discourses, James Madison in “Federalist No. 10 and Federalist No. 51” and Alexis De Tocqueville in Democracy in America Volume 2 all discuss the relationship between property and political life. Rousseau argues that property and amour-propre causes humans to destroy their equal society in which there is no need for government as justice is natural, as inequality in the form of injustice and evil which forces them to flee to a government in order to seek protection. Rousseau also asserts that the government established by the social contract needs to always pursue the common good and when people try to alter that they need to be forced to comply as the common good trumps all. Similarly, Madison argues that property is the foundation of factions in the American system as property inequality divides people up and in the same vein, property and greed force the government to create branches and gridlock in order to safeguard against the personal desires of

Although by judging solely from the definition, political expression which covers the matters of public interest seems acceptable, it is undeniable that under the Act 10 of the Federal Constitution, clause 2 has stated that the parliament can impose law to restrict the freedom of speech. Such restrictions are said to protect the security of Malaysia, privileges of Parliament and the public order. Besides, Art 10 (4) also stated that the law can restrict the questioning of any matter, status, privilege and sovereignty. InterNations (2014) has also explained that there are also limitations of civil freedoms