The Puppy That Lost Its Way

Conclusion: refers to the sentences or paragraphs that bring a speech, essay, report, or book to a satisfying and logical end.

22.  A ________________ is a fundamental form of reasoning where one proposition is inferred from two others.

Denotative-the quality present in a thing or person that gives intense pleasure or deep satisfaction to the mind, whether arising from sensory manifestations (as shape, color, sound, etc.), a meaningful design or pattern, or something else (as a personality in which high spiritual qualities are manifest).

Denotation is a word's literal meaning. For example, were Juliet to look up the word 'rose' in the dictionary, she would find something like, 'a bush or shrub that produces flowers, usually red, pink, white or yellow in color.' Similarly, street names, like Sistrunk Boulevard or Northeast Sixth Street, tell people where they are and help them get to where they want to go.

The article ‘The Affective Domain and the Writing Process: Working Definitions” by Susan H. McLeod examines the correlation between the writing process and the affective domain. In examining the two concepts, McLeod provides descriptions for the affective states: feeling, emotion, mood, motivation, drive, and instinct. These definitions work to create a leveled foundation for the discussion, but to also present definitions that might not otherwise been considered. McLeod examines each affective state and its impact on one’s ability to write. Despite her insight, McLeod composes an article that is based on research rather than data and experimental results. This paper will examine McLeod’s research on the affective domain and writing.

Induction and deduction are pervasive elements in critical thinking. They are also somewhat misunderstood terms. Arguments based on experience or observation are best expressed inductively, while arguments based on laws or rules are best expressed deductively. Most arguments are mainly inductive. In fact, inductive reasoning usually comes much more naturally to us than deductive reasoning.

Lawson, A. (1993). Inductive-deductive versus hypothetico-deductive reasoning: A reply to yore. J. Res. Sci. Teach., 30(6), pp.613-614.

Plumlee and Taverna (2013) state “Inductive arguments is an argument in which the acceptance of the conclusion depends upon the strength of the premises”. In an inductive argument, the conclusion is supported (but not proven) to a lesser or greater degree by the premises. Mometrix Academy (2014) states that an Inductive argument starts with facts and details and leads to a general conclusion”. This is labeled as bottom up logic.

Inductive is a method used to determine nature of scientific problems and make hypothesis through testing and theories of particular situations, generalize by observing to image a general explanation of a theory. Deductive reasoning, on the other hand, is the opposite or inductive it has a valid argument. This method starts general ideas and tests the possibilities to reach a

In the article “ Writer-Based Prose: A Cognitive Basis for Problems in Writing,” Linda Flower explains the differences between writer - based prose and reader - based prose, in other words, styles of writing. She describes the characteristics of the writer -based style of writing as a way for a writer to write for himself, where the author reflects on his or her own thoughts concerning a certain topic and not about the actual reader of the text and if they could understand it or not.

Deductive pattern or deductive reasoning uses facts, rules, definitions, or properties to arrive to a conclusion. It follows this sequence: Problem/introduction, recommendations, backgrounds/facts, and discussion/solutions. The problem/introduction talks about the reason of the report. Recommendations precisely and concisely state the recommendations resulting from the analysis. Background/facts provide relevant information and details that concerning issues. Discussion/solutions discusses the issues, develops the arguments, analyses the aspects of the problem, and demonstrates evidence for the report’s assertions. An example of deductive

The Personal writing genre is subjective (based on personal opinions or feelings rather than facts or evidence). When you write personal papers, the content of your writing is based on your own observation, experience, or opinion. Writing assignments that ask you to state your opinion about an issue, to document what you observed, to relate a subject to your own life, to share a story, or to provide a description of a person, place, object, or event are considered personal papers. Personal opinion and narrative essays fall into this category, as do some reflective papers. If you have ever written a paper about what you did on your summer vacation or given your opinion about an issue, you have written a personal paper. Personal writing asks

Denotation is the meaning of the word that contrast to the feeling of the word. An example of denotation from " President Lincoln's Declaration of Emancipation,

There are different ways to reasoning or understanding an issue. Those are deduction, induction, and abduction, but altogether will give a better comprehending. At the stage of abduction, the goal is to explore the data, find out a pattern, and suggest a plausible hypothesis or explanation; deduction is to build a logical and testable hypothesis based upon other reasonable premises; and induction is the approximation towards the truth in order to fix our beliefs for further inquiry. While deduction and induction are more logical thinking, abduction is more about critical thinking due to the search of explanations of an issue. Abduction and deduction are the conceptual understanding of a phenomenon, and induction is the calculable verification.

​Reasoning refers to the process of making use of preexisting knowledge to make conclusions, construct explanations, or make predictions regarding certain issues. According to philosophers, reasoning is broadly categorized into three parts: deductive, inductive, and adductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning begins with assertions of a more general rule and proceeds to a guaranteed conclusion that is specific in nature. Basically, it moves from the general rule to a specific approach. There is an assumption that should the original assertions be true; then, the conclusions are true beyond reasonable doubt. Such kind of reasoning is mostly applied in disciplines like mathematics. Secondly, there is inductive reasoning. In this type of reasoning, specific observations that are limited in scope proceed to generalized conclusions formulated from accumulated evidence; that is, one moves from specific to general. Thus, this approach comes in handy when carrying out scientific research because it entails information gathering, pattern seeking, and formulation of hypotheses to explain the observations. Lastly, there is adductive reasoning. The approach normally starts with an incomplete set of observations and builds towards the likeliest possible explanation. The type of reasoning produces the kind of day-to-day decision making, which relies on the information at hand. This paper will focus on addressing the role of reasoning in