The Purpose Of The First Guard Against Tyranny

In May of 1787, Philadelphia, the constitution was written. The old constitution, Articles of Confederation, had weaknesses which were no court system and no chief-executive. Instead of using the old constitution, they created a new set of laws to hold the states and people together without having the situation that one or a few people having more powers to control people, which defines the word tyranny. The constitution limited tyranny by dividing the powers between the State and the Central governments, separating the the three branches and limiting the number of house representatives and senators in each state.

The U.S constitution guards against tyranny through the separations of powers. This claim is true because the constitution was made in order to avert another tyrannical form of government from ever taking place again through the allocation of governmental powers. An example of the division of powers is seen in the Federalist #51 as the document states, “... the power surrendered by the people is first divided between two distinct governments, & the portion allotted to each subdivided among distinct and separate departments” (Doc. A). These direct words from the Federalist #51 basically state that the power of the government which is given by the people is divided into national and state powers and then furthermore divided into smaller sub powers.

The Constitution guarded against tyranny through federalism. Federalism is a government where the states and federal government share the power. Doc A is an excerpt from Federalist Paper #51 by James Madison made in 1788. The Federalist Papers were a series of essays convincing people

The constitution guards against tyranny through, checks and balances, Federalism, and by giving large and small states powers. One way the Constitution guards against tyranny is through a system called checks and balances. Checks and balances is a way for each of the three branches of government to check on each other to make sure none of them gets too powerful. Some examples of checks and balances include, the Executive checking the Legislative by being able to veto bills, then the Legislative can check the Executive on that by overriding the veto, and finally the Judicial can check both of them on that by declaring that law unconstitutional, but then the Legislative branch could propose an amendment to the constitution (C). It could

The constitution makes use of separation of powers in order to prevent tyranny. In conjunction with his view of tyranny, Madison also said “(L)iberty requires that the three great departments of power be separate and distinct” (James Madison, Federalist Paper #47, Document B). This quote alludes quite clearly to separation of powers. Using this philosophy the founders gave each branch a few set jobs to perform. The legislative branch

The first way the framers guarded against tyranny was by federalism. Federalism splits the power between the central government and the states so they each get equal power. James Madison said in the Federalist paper #51, “The different governments will each control each other, at the same time that each

The second guard against tyranny was the separation of powers which means the government was distributed into three different branches. The legislature powers will vested in a congress of the United States. Executive power shall be vested into the president of the United States. Each president is limited two terms for a total of 8 years. The judicial power is invested into the supreme court. The separation of powers protects against tyranny because it makes it harder to influence over many people instead of just one

The different governments will each control each other , at the same time that each will be controlled by itself .” This helps prove that the creation of Federalism prevented tyranny within the Constitution because they arranged it to where the states and government will have its powers but will also have some powers alike. By this they realized that there won't be no arbitrary use of power within the government because they split up their powers . One of them being that the central government was able to conduct foreign relations versus the states that had the power to pass marriage and divorce laws and both are able to set up courts, which was also shown

from tyranny by diving the branches of government. The legislative branch should be completely different from the executive or the judicial branch (Doc B). This scares people from taking over the government because handling three different branches may seem like a lot of work. From this, the separation of powers protects us from tyranny.

The Constitution defends against tyranny by creating a compound government called federalism. Federalism is the power that is divided into two distinct governments: Central Government and power to the States. The Central Government has the power to regulate trade, conduct foreign relations, provide and army and a navy, and declare war. The power given to the states are to set up local governments, hold elections, establish schools, and regulate in-state businesses. The powers they share are the power to tax, set up courts, make and enforce laws. 'The different governments will each control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself' (James Madison- Document A). The Constitution represses against tyranny

The first guard against tyranny was Federalism. Federalism means the power given to the states, central governments and the powers that they both share. Document A states that the central government can regulate trade, conduct foreign relations, and declare war. Federalism protects against tyranny because the central government and state government have enough power that they do not control everything. James Madison states that "the different governments will each control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself."

Tyranny comes in many shapes and sizes. It can come in the shape of a king, or a group of nobles, or a committee of military leaders. Whatever the shape or the size, tyranny is a problem because it means too much power in the hands of one person or group. In the summer of 1787, the writers of the constitution met in Philadelphia to frame a new government. One of their biggest jobs was to protect against different kinds of tyranny. The framers did this in four ways: federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, and finally, by balancing out power between small states and large states.

The three branches balance each other, so one does not override the others. In Document B it’s showing that each branch has its own job and as James Madison says “liberty requires that the three great departments of power should be separate and distinct” he's admiring that if there's one representative for two powers that there would be tyranny. Separation of powers can prevent tyranny by making people not want to take over the government because it’s hard to take over three separate branches. Checks and balances help make sure the laws are ok and constitutional.

Second way the Constitution guards against tyranny is separation of powers. Separation of Powers means divided the power up among the three branch of government. In Document B it says, “Liberty requires that the great departments of powers should be separate and distinct.” James Madison stated that the power has to be spread and not given to one person or one branch of

A third way that the framers used the Constitution protects against tyranny was checks and balances. “...The constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they check on the other...” The main goal is to make sure that each of the three branches have control over each other but still separated. This protects against tyranny because each branch has powers the control one another. In document C it states how each level of government limits and balances each other out to keep the powers even, and how