The Pursuit of a Theory of Everything

Both these question can be answered on the same page. A number of aspects of the universe can be understood only in the light of more recent unifications theories. To understand the GUT era or Grand Unification Theory era we need to know that it occurred when the universe was subject to the force of gravity and GUT force. The GUT force “predicts that the strong force becomes unified with the weak and electromagnetic forces at energies above 10^14 GeV.” The Grand Unified Theory states that for the three forces to merge together, the temperature of the universe has to be greater than 10^32 K. The GUT era lasted until the temperature of the universe dropped to about 10^29 K. at this point the GUT forces separated into electromagnetic and strong forces. This temperature was reached when the universe was at the young age of about 10^-36 of a second. This sudden cooling caused something called inflation. Inflation was a rapid and sudden expansion of the universe. Basically the unified theories state that the four forces, strong, electromagnetic, weak, and gravitational will merge at extremely high temperatures. Although we have a few assumptions about the GUT, scientist have not been able to succeed in creating the details that have to do with a supergrand unified theory, also referred to as the theory of everything.

To explain, beginning with the basic atomic building blocks, a perfect harmony of protons, electrons and neutrons must be in a balanced existence for any and all to even occur. In addition, through scientific study our species has discovered how notions of gravity, oxygen, and complex interactions between energy and matter all coexist (once again in perfect harmony) to create the moment us ‘humans’ take so fiercely for granted. Whether through direct social control, notions of ‘common sense’, popular norms, and all the other various politics of life it is easy to lose sight of the clarity, divinity, and simplicity of the

Ambrose, E Stephen. “Preparing for the Expedition.” Undaunted Courage: Meriwether Lewis, Thomas Jefferson, and the Opening of the American West. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1996. 80-92. Print.

Aristotle imagines an infinitely vast and eternally complicated universe, all under the control of a divine being. He states that the reason for the universe must be love because if God did not desire the universe, He would not allow the universe to exist. Through further observation, Aristotle then claims that a change must be caused to change. It is through these changes that all physical entities appear only temporarily. He then claims that there are four fundamental principles that describe all causes.

Howard Gardner is my top theorists because I like his idea on multiple intelligence, and how each of us possesses seven distinct and measurable forms of intelligence. I like John Dewey idea of us learning by doing, and how learning occurs through experience. And his idea on teaching children with hands on activity which I think is the best way to teach kids. And I also like Lev Vygotsky I like his idea that an individual can perform independently, while others performed if they have assistance. Skills can be performed with assistance are said to be within an individual’s ZPD.

What scientific theories, laws, hypotheses and models all have in common is that they are part of the process of building a scientific explanation.

Alongside my wider research into physics, I enjoy learning about the history and story of each

Since the dawn of the man we have been wanderers and explorers, looking up at the night sky, studying the stars, and pondering the origin of them. How did we get here? Who are we? Why are we here? Why does anything exist? These are questions that have baffled us since we first looked to the stars, and still do continue to linger amongst us. Will we ever know the answer to these questions? This cannot be easily answered, for we uncover new mysteries every day, but with the uncovering of one mystery, comes the discovery of another. In Steven Hawking’s “The Grand Design” and the “Theory of Everything” he discusses these mysteries that have dominated our lives since the beginning. Starting with a brief history of our understanding of the

General characterristics – The material MCP-4275-PV represents the right ramus of a hemimandible of about 500mm length, which is divided in two parts due a median fracture of taphonomic process. It is noticed that the material was folded over the preservation process, which the anterior part reached out the posterior part causing the break. The hemimandible features the lower anterior portion to the rear with respectively 33mm and 102mm roughly. The glenoid cavity lay beyond the dorsal limit of the dentary bone, suggesting a decreasing anteroposterior height pattern. It features a side compression in the fullest extent. There is a damage in the posterior end, where is positioned the post-glenoid area (PGA), and in the anterior end, where lay

THE SCIENTIFIC THEORY: aka I’ve scoured the net, and yet none have mentioned the following theory pertaining to The Retribution of Mara Dyer

Matter is the thing which takes on form. All change in the universe is the result of opposition between contraries, in this case between the three primary principles of, ‘privation, form and matter’. The theme of opposition between contraries ran through many Aristotelian theories, such as the primary qualities. Matter lacked form and was suitable to receiving all forms. Privation was simply the absence of form and the potentiality of acquiring new form.[9] Through this process of privation, form and matter, elements had the ability to transform in to each other, within Aristotle’s elemental matter theory.

We presuppose that our universe is logical, consistent and orderly. The laws of nature are there when we need them. These laws never fail and they do not change. This constancy is what scientists call the uniformity of nature.

Different theories can help us describe how the universe works. Many people believe that love is a beneficial aspect of life. Love is a variety of different feelings, states, attitudes, that ranges from the interpersonal affection to pleasure. Although this may be true love can be looked at in many different factors. Love can be considered as the center of the universe that affects the lives of most humans. Dewi Lestari’s Supernova tells the story of two men who fall back in love after ten years of being apart, who come together to write a story about the love between two people, and relating it back to how they think the universe works. The novel first starts off telling us about a man named Ferré, who lived a bland and boring life until

The Universal Laws govern all of life without exception; from the glaciers to earthquakes, from spinning tops and spinning planets to newborns and world leaders, from elephants and arachnids to amoebas, to orchids, oranges and microorganisms.

In the scientific community, there are numerous models used to explain data, which despite being argued over, can be used to spread knowledge. One model proposed by Hempel is the “Covering Law Model,” which can be explained when he writes: “The kind of explanation thus characterized I will call deductive nomological explanation; for it amounts to a deductive subsumption of the explanandum under principles which have the character of general laws” (Hempel, 658). Essentially, the D-N model explains scientific explanation as deductive, requiring the truth of its premises to ensure the truth of the conclusion, which also must be backed up by an accurate prediction of whichever phenomenon is being explained. However, there are problems with this model, as explained by Kim when he writes: “In a nutshell, then, the trouble is that we have had models, but not theories, of explanation” (Kim, 53). Hempel’s critics want to include metaphysics under explanation, which would essentially mean putting more emphasis on causal factors to make sense of the world, rather than using readily explainable phenomenon like gravitational pull. Though they have their disagreements with each other, I believe that both methods have merit, and adding causal realism to the Covering Law Model is currently the best solution to explaining scientific concepts.