The Race Between Education And Technology Chapter 3 Summary

In this paper, I will explore the aspects regarding racial inequality pertaining to education in the United States of America. It has come to my attention, based on my observations, that race is a definitive factor that plays a role in establishing socioeconomic status. In relation to socioeconomic status, variables correlating with race that I will be focusing on, is the educational and wealth aspects. An individual’s level of education is pivotal to establishing stable, consistent wealth and vice-versa; the access for quality education is inconsistent primarily among minority races/ethnicities. According to historical records ranging from the year 1980 to 2000, between Whites, Hispanics, African-Americans, and Native Americans, the educational attainment gap is widening (Kelly 2005). Education is seen to be a source of respect and key to gaining a higher income, which transfers over to greater wealth. Acknowledging the slow expansion of the educational attainment disparities, I argue that the society’s perceptions and actions addressing race perpetuates and produces social inequalities by limiting opportunities despite “equal” resources, privileges, and rights through social policies that have contributed towards the quality of America’s education system.

Gary Becker’s and Kevin Murphy’s article, “The Upside of Income Inequality”, analyzes the positive effects of the income gap, and Paul Krugman’s New York Times column, “Confronting Inequality”, stresses the negative impact of the income gap; it is apparent by juxtaposing these two texts that income inequality can be effected by economic development, education, and social equality.

However despite opposing outlooks on the ability of their education systems to aid lucrative employment opportunities, MacLeod observed that both groups seem to have obtained similar low paying and irregular job nine years later. So what exactly is it about the structure of the American Education system that seems to reproduce social inequality? MacLeod analyzes schools as sites on

In 1970, the top fifth of all families had incomes that averaged 223 percent of the national average, while the bottom fifth had incomes of 28 percent of the average. From 1946 to 1960, the difference in inequality did not change much, but from 1960 to 1968 there was a slight decline. On the contrary, between 1968 and 1970 the opposite had happen. To further explain the little difference in Income Inequality from the mid 1940’s to the present, a series of numbers and percentages will be used, but only the salaries made throughout the years are the only difference, it’s obvious that the gap between the rich and the poor keeps increasing. The salaries of course are going to be different due to the minimum wages increasing as time goes by, due to the higher cost of living. That does not mean that the Poor Class is living better, in fact, if anything, the Poor Class is having a harder time surviving due to the increased cost of living, yes the salaries rise, but not to the extent to keep up with the cost of living. It’s almost as if a poor person would have to work at more than one job in order to be able to survive, and in most cases that’s not even enough, depending on the situation that a person is in, family size, debt, etc. Due to those circumstances, if a person is working more than one job, then that will limit that person’s time to actually educate themselves at a higher education institution, and that will lead to yet another highly uneducated American

The educational system has been around for thousands of years, and throughout time, there have always existed equality issues. From girls not being able to attend school as far as the boys, to children being separated into different schools because of the color of their skin, equality in education is an issue that has plagued humanity for far too long. Throughout the years, there have been some important decisions made in an effort to afford equality in education. Perhaps, as we move forward in our thinking and beliefs, we may find a way to make education a right that everyone who has the desire to grow through knowledge should be afforded, regardless of circumstance.

One literature found that despite the steady increase in the average years of formal education attained by Americans, and the shrinking gap in education

Due to the flatteners, countries such as: China, India, Russia, Eastern Europe, Latin America, and Central Asia now actively participate in a flattened world. This is shaping global economics and politics. Furthermore, this has presented a challenge to America to build not only a strong state, but strong individuals as well. With that being said there are three gaps creating a crisis for Americans. The first gap is the “ambition gap”. According to the author, “Americans have gotten too lazy” compared to their Indian and Chinese counterparts. The second is a serious numbers gap building, meaning we are not producing enough engineers and scientists. In the past America would import Indian and Chinese engineers and scientist; however, because the world is flat they are competing from home. The final gap is an education gap. Often times CEO outsource in an effort to save on company cost by paying lower salaries and to get better-skilled and more productive workers.

The strongest claim the author made was that the economy and education are highly intertwined. It is stated that without a public access to a higher level of education, the income equality will grow larger and our country of democracy and prosperity will be in jeopardy. The

The US income gap has increased dramatically within the past 100 years according to Emmanuel Suez, an economics professor at the University of California, Berkley. Daniel Santos has witnessed wealth inequality in the US firsthand. He was raised in a small town north of Lubbock, Texas called O’Donnell. Working long, hot summers and weekends in the fields of America, he has continued throughout his life to persevere past social and economic boundaries. From a lower class family to a financially stable home with a family of five. The American dream can be achieved despite economic disadvantages through discipline, perseverance, and ambition. However, it is insensible to disregard wealth inequality as a modern issue. 20th-Century economics have had various

The focus of Becker and Murphy’s article “The Upside of Income Inequality” is “Growth in the education level of the population has been a significant source of raising wages, productivity, and living standards over the past century.” (585). Becker and Murphy wrote “The Upside of Income Inequality” as a statement “committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise.” (581). They argue that the average income for a person with a higher education keeps getting higher, and the lower class will also see a raise in the income they receive and raise the overall standard of living for communities.

An important factor in the creation of inequality is variation in individuals’ access to education (Becker, et. Al, 2007). According to Bosworth et. Al, (1999) education in a field that requires or demand a high number of workers, creates high wages for those with advance education. As a result, those who are unable to afford good quality education or choose not to participate in schools or colleges, generally receive much lower wages and thus it lowers aggregate savings and investment. In particular, the increase in family income and wealth

Professor of ecology and evolution, Peter Turchin, describes the condition of the U.S. with a few statistics, “Today, the top one per cent of incomes in the United States accounts for one fifth of US earnings. The top one per cent of fortunes holds two-fifths of the total wealth. Just one rich family, the six heirs of the brothers Sam and James Walton, founders of Walmart, are worth more than the bottom 40 per cent of the American population combined.” (Cite) Turchin also analyzes economic inequality within the United States over the past 200 years. Within the time frame of the 1800s to the 1920s, economic inequality “increased more than a hundredfold.” Then from this point until the 1980s there was a period known as the “Great Compression” where economic equality grew. Over the past 40 years the trend has turned back towards inequality, and we find ourselves reentering an elitist, discriminatory system. Using historical economic patterns, the U.S. appears to have entered a new era of stagnation for economic equality.

First, the increased income inequality in the United States is due to increasing problematic issues in the education sector. Education plays an increasingly vital part in the economic success in the United States as technological transformations and globalizations increase. A weakening middle class leads to decreased improvements in the education system, while a stronger middle class leads to increased

America is often enamored of itself as the champion of equality in every aspect of its society; however, this is often not the case. This is true in every aspect of life, but is very evident specifically in the American education system. Although America claims to give an equal education to all, regardless of any external factors, economic class often plays a role in what type and how good of an education a student may receive. Since education is the basis for future success, this inequity resulting from socioeconomic status implies that this is where inequality in everyday life starts, and that the system generates this inequality. If this is true, then one might ask, what then is the purpose of education? If economic class predetermines

Education is one of the most important professions in the working world. Technology has done many things for us in today’s society especially for education and schools. Technology in the school system has impacted the students and teachers in many positive ways, including virtual field trips, testing tips, teacher resources, class web sites, and lesson plans. With computer use in our schools, we have access to many different sources and various types of learning.