South Park Satire

South Park being satirical, it shows some things that are ridiculous in today’s society. In South Park’s last season finale, it is focusing satire on political correctness. Just like microaggressions, political correctness is basically not using tiny offensive words and to think before you speak. A new principal is taking over South Park, Colorado, his name ironically being “P.C. Principal”. P.C.

As something people tend to hold the most dearly, culture can be a sensitive topic to discuss and engage in. Often, it is made even more difficult due to issues of the past and the way different cultures influence one another. Moreover, the concepts of cultural assimilation and mainstreaming have brought light on problems regarding the treatment of minority cultures within American culture, specifically with the use of stereotyped imagery and hijacking outside cultural ideas. The issues of cultural stereotyping and assimilation, as seen in South Park, have garnered attention due to the nature of offence and its subjective nature.

The corpus to be analyzed consists of the most controversial episodes of an internationally popular and long-running adult animation show called Family Guy. This show represents cultural attitudes and embodies how the youth of today see themselves and others, as well as influencing viewers. Some messages in this popular show, and others like it, underscore prejudices and racist attitudes in our society, showcasing the discrimination that minorities and some ethnicities face. Furthermore, these shows actually serve to strengthen existing prejudices, increasing these attitudes in viewers.

South Park has been around for a while now. Since it was aired for the first time on 13th August 1997, the show has constantly pushed the boundaries taking on everything, leaving out nothing. The reception among the wider population and the media had a wide range from “shocking” to “excellent”. One of the aspects of this success story is that, because of its provocative tone the show has managed to stay in the limelight. Public debate was evolving around certain episodes, bringing more and more attention to the show. As it was constantly picking up contemporary themes, topics or events, expectations were growing and “ 'How will South Park deal with x ' has become a common catch phrase” (Johnson-Woods 257). Another

While some religions treat it as the worst thing imaginable, it is a lifestyle is lived by many and cannot be changed. Heterosexual people that do not have a negative opinion of the homosexual community are one of the reasons that they are able to prosper so well. Without the help and support of others that are outside, progress is hard to be mad. As long as empathy plays a role in this then the goal will continually be reached as more people understand. Just as they are seeing that a homosexual couple can raise a child just the same as a heterosexual couple can. The data in the article says that about 70 percent of those who responded to the poll said that gay couples should receive the same treatment and rights as straight couples. This is all out of sympathy. What if children were not allowed to be adopted by a heterosexual couple that was able to love and support them? It would hurt not only the couple, but the child in the long run due to foster care being an inadequate form of nurturing for developing

Adam Liptak, a journalist for the New York Times, explained in Utah, in Opposing Gay Marriage, Find Three Arguments are Better than One why a heterosexual relationship is better for raising children in. The Utah law that would have allowed same sex couples to marry was recently shot down. Liptak goes on to explain why he agrees with the bill not being passed. The article states that this was important in “holding up and encouraging man-woman unions as the ‘preferred’ arrangement in which to raise children” (Liptak, 2014, para. 12). This discrimination towards same sex couples wanting to raise children is appalling. Homosexual couples should have the right to raise children just as heterosexual couples do.

The typical classic rock documentary tends to focus on the musicians and what being a part of the band did to them individually. However, This is Spinal Tap is like no other rock documentary. Through its use of satirical devise such as Exaggeration, Parody, and warped logic This is Spinal Tap follows a band on their American tour, one of the lowest points in their careers. It not only satirizes the typical rock band of the time but it also ridicules American culture at the time.

Many people from older generations argue that same sex parenting is an abomination resisting any other insight into what is truly best for children. But it is true that hundreds of thousands of children are placed in foster care awaiting their forever families, and these children should not be denied a permanent family because of narrow mindedness. It does not take a scientist to figure that two people of the same sexual orientation cannot biologically conceive a child on their own; therefore adoption is the only option homosexuals have. While adoption

South park censorship controversy

South Park have always received mixed response from it’s audiences. Famous for the use of foul language, dark humour which satirizes a wide range of topics (such as politics, racism, gender equality e.t.c.) and portrayal of religion for comic effect, the show generated countless debates and controversy over the course of it’s run. The debate over censorship of some episodes, and the show as a whole continues nowadays, and both sides seem to have truth behind their words. Pro-censorship group states that South Park is harmful for young minds, that religion is not the right thing to joke about and that show has to know it’s limits.

The difference between the intended meaning of media texts and what the audience actually perceives can be shockingly different. Producers of media can do everything possible to force audiences to experience their work in the way they want them to, but in the end they still take away many different meanings even within the same audience. Stuart Hall outlines this in his encoding and decoding model. One of the most apparent examples of this is the television show South Park. The television show South Park is a media text with the producers’ preferred meaning of being decoded as joke or as being satire, but many audience members take an oppositional stance of taking it seriously. This is clear from the examples of controversy when South Park aired episodes focused on Scientology, red-headed people, and Islam. Through these examples it is demonstrated that the producers of media have less power compared to the audience in determining the meaning of media.

Throughout history, generations of Americans have been defined by the freedoms they fought for. Our founding fathers obviously fought for liberty from England, women at the turn of the 20th century bravely campaigned for the right to vote, and the youth of the 1950s and 1960s are perhaps best known for championing racial equality. In many, many years, the historians that reflect upon society today will probably agree that the most substantial battle waged by this generation is the one for LGBT rights. Great strides have been made for the gay community over the past several years, culminating with the Supreme Court ruling to recognize gay marriages as legal in all fifty states. However, the fight for homosexual equality is far from over. Despite having gained the right to marry-which was seen by many as the main focus of the gay rights movement- many people are still discriminated against in a variety of arenas every day because of their sexuality. One such sector is that of adoption. Although their inability to reproduce may make them appear to be the ideal candidates for adoption, many groups feel that gay couples should be prohibited from adopting due to religious or moral convictions. However, a strong case can certainly be made for allowing homosexual adoptions, namely because homosexuals already regularly adopt without incident, research has proven that gay parenting is not harmful to children, and it would support adoption in general.

Imagine for a moment that you are the loving foster parent of a 10 year old boy that you’ve raised since infancy. You consider him your son and are willing and able to adopt this child and have also proven your competency to do just that. Homosexuals have always faced discrimination, mostly for religious purposes, and have been denied basic rights that are not denied to heterosexuals.

Most people believe that children will suffer from having the same sex parents because, According to Ken Connor, who heads up the Family Research Council, “gays should not be allowed to raise children as part of some social experiment to see what the effects might be on these so-called “guinea pigs.” But in my opinion it should not matter if you are homosexual or hetersexual, if you have a good home environment and great income then you are qualified to become a parent to a child in need. Most states believe that. Every states does not approve of the same sex adoption except for, California, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, and Washington, DC.. Gay and lesbian adoption is an question in the United States. It is a twist with the ongoing controversies surrounding sexuality, marriage, and family. As states attempt to sort out these issues according to the wishes of their residents, and as some states’ decisions conflict with those of neighboring states, it is obvious that the country is divided over the issues surrounding the definition of family for gay and lesbian couples. But however, gay adoption should be banned throughout the United States because of the potential for irreparable harm it could inflict on the children

Since the early 1900s, homosexual people have become increasingly popular and greatly resisted. People that are homosexual face barriers placed upon them by the political system and society. Due to these challenges, homosexuals fought to have the same marital and parental rights as heterosexual people. Same-sex adoption is not prohibited in most states in the United States of America and many places worldwide. Family is not determined solely on blood relations and should be legalized in all parts of the world; because homosexual parents are just as good as heterosexual parents, if not better, and can provide an enriching second chance for many children waiting to be adopted.

Nowadays, the question of gay marriage is one of the most heated and controversial. Over the years, same-sex couples are fighting for the legal recognition for their marriages and their right as parents. Parenthood is one of the most valuable experiences in a human life. After finding a partner, it is natural for people to want to raise children. Homosexual parent are the same in ability and commitment to raised healthy children. It would be a big step for improvement in our society to provide necessary support and rights for same-sex couples and their children.