The Rartifiation of the Us Constitution

People had many different opinions on the ratification of the Constitution. There were Federalists and Anti-Federalists that debated on many topics of the Constitution. The main reasons were: what type of government the United States of America should have, the people controlling our government, and some of the powers they should have. The Federalists were the ones who wanted change. They wanted to make changes to the government that was originally proposed. The Federalists wanted the government to protect the people, but not abuse their powers. They wanted to have the powers divided between the national and the state governments. The Constitution also stated that the government

The Federalists political party mostly consisted of the upper class people of the United States such as the big farmers, the merchants, and artisans. The Feds wanted the Constitution to be ratified. They supported the Constitution and all of it’s views. The Federalists wanted a change and wanted to shift the power from the States to the central government. However, they didn’t want the central government to be too powerful and wanted the States to continue to retain some of their powers. The Federalists pointed out that the Articles of Confederation failed to keep the country together and with all the power in the State’s hands, the United

The Anti-Federalist party was made up of people who, for the most part, lived in the country. They were opposed to developing a federal government, and they did not want to ratify the Constitution, which, they claimed, threatened each free person’s liberites, until the authors included the Bill of Rights. (This granted individual rights of citizens. The Anti-Federalists wanted to write down these so that they could not be taken away from the people by the government like England had done.) Instead, they wanted the state governments to keep the power to prevent monarchies and dictatorships. Famous members of this party were Thomas Jefferson, Samuel Adams, Patrick Henry, John Hancock, Mercy Otis Warren, George Mason, Richard Henry Lee, and James Monroe. They favored the Articles of Confederation. However, the Articles of Confederation had a few flaws: if a law was to pass, it would need a majority rule (9/13); it lacked a court system (nationally); and it was missing an executive branch. The Bill of Rights was appreciated because they wanted to make sure that individual rights could not be taken away. The Anti-Federalists may not have been a group that agreed with one another all the time, but as their opinions varied, more rights were thought of and protected. For example, one part of the group held the view that the sovereignty of states could be endangered

In debate of the ratification of the Constitution, the Federalists and the Anti- Federalists agreed on several things: the necessity of some form of national government, the preservation of the right to vote, and the need to secure our liberties. The Federalists wanted a strong central government, whereas the Anti- Federalists wanted more power reserved to the state government. The right to vote is important for both sides, but they hold conflicting views on the amount of involvement through the power of the vote. Finally, individual rights is something that they both strongly agree upon, but where it should be officially held in our documents presents a huge conflict. Between Federalists and Anti- Federalists, there is an understanding in the importance of these matters, however each side has different interpretations in mind.

Between the years of 1783 and 1791, there were continuities and discontinuities between the goals and viewpoints of the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Anti-Federalists were those who opposed the development of a strong government and the ratification of the Constitution in 1788. They preferred for the power to remain between state and local governments. On the contrary, Federalists wanted a stronger national government and they were in favor of the ratification of the Constitution, in an attempt to help effectively manage the debt and tensions that were present as a result of the American Revolution. The Articles of Confederation were adopted by the Continental Congress on November 15, 1777. In the Articles of Confederation, there was one

Federalists argued that the Constitution would improve the nation’s economy and social status, as well as fixing the errors made in the Articles of Confederation. Anti-federalists argued that the new Constitution’s executive branch received too much power and the poorer and less educated would receive the least power. Anti-federalists also argued that the Constitution would violate their natural rights and freedoms. Although the Anti-federalists may have made solid arguments, the federalists won the debate. In order for the Anti-federalists to agree with the U.S. Constitution. The convention compromised with the Anti-federalists to write the Bill of Rights to protect and secure citizens rights. Slowly, but surely the U.S. corrected other errors addressed by the Anti-federalists Constitution along the way. All in all, this discourse was a healthy debate for shaping the present United States of

The Anti-Federalists felt as though the Constitution gave too much power to the national government, taking away all power from the states. They feared that the nation was too large for the national government to be able to represent all of the states without representation from each state. The Federalists countered this by explaining that the federal government had limited powers that were separated into three branches. The idea of checks and balances was also supplied by the Federalists as a way to prevent any branch from having too much power. The Federalists were able to prove that the federal government would not have too much

The Revolutionary War declared America’s independence from Great Britain, which led to the implementation of the Articles of Confederation on November 15, 1777. The government under the Articles of Confederation was extremely weak and did not have the power to enforce laws. The articles of confederation were ratified in 1781 due to many problems such as no separation of power and very limit powers are given to Congress. The ratification divided the people according to their political views, that division of people is known as federalists and anti-federalists. Federalist wanted a stronger central government opposed to the anti-federalist who wanted a weak central government.

After the American Revolution our nation was in major debt and suffering from an ecumenic depression throughout the colonies. The debt and other fiscal issues our nation was facing made some of the founding political members to want a more focused federal power. The opinions of two groups known as the Federalists and Anti-Federalists were divided about the new proposed Constitution. The founding members known as the Federalists wanted a strong central government and weak state governments were in favor of keeping the newly proposed Constitution,whereas the opposing group of men were known as the Anti-Federalists were opposed to it. The Anti-Federalists had believed that the power should belong to the states and not the central government, and that the nation should keep the Articles of Confederation despite the fact that it had failed. In the time period of 1787-1788 the views and ideas of the Federalists would have been better than those of the Anti-Federalists for more than one reason.

The Federalist and Anti-Federalist were groups of men trying to figure out to do with the Constitution. The Anti-Fed were mainly farmers and workers, they believed that the original US Constitution made the government too strong. The Federalist thought different, they felt as if we needed it to keep the US in place. This debate went on for a minute because they couldn’t meet in the middle.

The focus point of the anti-federalist argument revolved around the support of a weaker federal government. After the Declaration of Independence was signed, there was a necessity to unite the nation. A way was needed to govern the land amassed by the thirteen colonies. On the twelfth of July, 1776, eight days after the signing of the Declaration of Independence, the Second Continental Congress began efforts to create the fundamental principles on which to govern the nation while managing the colonial war effort. Once a version was complete it was sent to be ratified by the states in 1777. Ratification by the states was completed in 1781. This document is known as the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation were deliberately weak, which followed logically after breaking away from the strong British government. There was however a group that opposed the weak federal government created by the Articles of Confederation, and they came to be known as the federalists. The group that supported a weaker government thus came to be known as the anti-federalists. As the government played out on the nations stage, members of the anti-federalist party would change, uphold or augment their ideals.

“Articles of Confederation was an written agreement summarizing the agreement between different parties the federalist and the anti-federalist”. Federalist wanted to ratify the constitution,and Anti-federalist did not want to ratify it. One big issue they had was the concern of adding the “Bill of Rights”. The Federalist felt like it was unnecessary because, they believed the Constitution should only limited the government not the people. The Anti-federalist felt like the Constitution gave central government too much power.

Even though America worked hard to obtain independence and faced many challenges along the way, they now had new obstacles with forming a new government that they set out to tackle. Congress faced many problems that consisted with the Articles of Confederation. Getting all states to come together as one nation was a difficult challenge. The Federalists were a strong group that had strong beliefs that the Articles of Confederation or new government was an effective way to build an efficient economy and great nation. The Federalist came up with many ways to strengthen the central government. Their key elements were necessary for the new government to take place.

At the birth of our nation, there were two major political parties the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. Federalists supported a new constitution and were in favor of a strong central government while Anti-Federalists didn’t want a new constitution and supported a strong state government. The leaders of the Federalists were Alexander Hamilton and John Adams and the leaders of the Anti-Federalists were Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. The Federalists were mostly merchants, bankers, and lawyers living mainly in New England. The Anti-Federalists were mainly planters, farmers, and wage earners living primarily in the south. What led to the constitutional convention was that the states had problems in trade, which led to fights over taxes.

After Shay’s Rebellion and the nation on the brink of bankruptcy it was clear that the Articles of Confederation would not be adequate to preserve the nation. So began the great battle for the balance between order and freedom. The main point of dispute between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists in the battle over the ratification of the Constitution surrounded the question of what powers and rights were required in order to insure the security and liberty of the nation. The Federalists advocated that a strong central government was needed, which was supported by the failure of the Articles of Confederation. However the Anti-Federalists were determined on keeping the sovereignty of