The Rational Choice Theory Of Criminology

This essay will outline how crime theories are able to assist in recognizing the causes of criminal activity, as well as demonstrating two criminological theories to two particular crimes. Overviews of trends, dimensions and victim/offenders characteristics of both crime groups will be specified. The two particular crimes that will be demonstrated throughout this essay are; Violent Crime (focusing on Assault) being linked with social learning theory and White Collar crime (focusing on terrorism) being linked to General Strain theory. In criminology, determining the motive of why people commit crimes is crucial. Over the years, many theories have been developed and they continue to be studied as criminologists pursue the best answers in eventually diminishing certain types of crime including assaults and terrorism, which will be focused on.

The classical school of criminology is foundationally based upon the history of crime and punishment. Throughout history, crime was dealt with in an extremely harsh and inhumane manner. Criminals and suspected criminals were quartered, burnt at the stake, tortured, and subjected to other forms of extreme violence. These methods were used to get a confession or punish people for even minor crimes such as theft. The people of the Enlightenment period of the late 1600 's paid attention to this behavior and this is why a

Cesare Beccaria is the “Father of Classical Criminology” and justified punishment on the principle of utility. Beccaria focused on reforming the Criminal Justice System and believed that punishment should be for the better good for society, as well as the individual, and deter others from committing crime and prevent criminals from recommitting crime. He believes effective punishment must certain, swift, and severe to get the desired effect on society and the offender (Robert, Cullen, and Ball 2015). He is also the author of his book Of Crime and Punishment, which discussed his philosophy on the purposes

Classical school of criminology is testing and designing a system of punishment that would result in the minimum occurrence of crime. The Classical school also represents the development and application to thinking about crime and the ideas. In general, the will is free, there were no limitations. Hobbes conceived that fear was an elemental drive causing men to form societies and accept the necessary restraints (1958, p. 9.) Apparently upon Hobbes’s thought, fear affected the will of an individual action to commit a crime. In addition, fear of punishment would perhaps prevent crime from occurring. Punishment was a principal method of operating to create fear, and it was necessary to influence the will and to control behavior.

The classical perspective founded by Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham; stated that at people choose to commit crime after they considered the pros and cons that could be associated with a crime, and believed that the pros outweighed the cons (Tonry,2014). The theory relied on deterring criminal acts by assuring that the consequences of crime are absolute, harsh, and quickly administered (Tonry,2014).

Criminology and the criminal justice system have framed a “taken-for-granted, common-sense” understanding of ‘crime’ and the ‘criminal’ (Tierney, 2010). ‘Crime’ is commonly understood as a violation of the criminal law; originating from religion and the sin of God and then moving towards Classicalism. Classicalism rests on the assumption of free will and recognises rational choice of the individual. It influences much of our system of justice today; especially aspects of due process. It argues that criminality is therefore part of nature; and order is maintained through law and punishments. We can see this through Beccaria’s approach of certainty, celerity and severity (Beccaria, cited in Newburn, 2013, pp116). Positivism, associated with theorists such as Lombroso, offered more of a scientific approach in identifying the causes of crime and could recognise impaired ability such as mental illness. It argues that ‘crime’ is

Classical Criminology The classical school of criminology was around in the eighteenth century. It came abount in a time when the previous dominent spiritual look at defining crime and criminal behaviour was being challenged by a newer naturalistic approach of the social contract theorists. The classical school was the established ideas of monarchs, fedual lords and the fathers of the church.

Theories of crime causation get to the fundamental characteristics of human nature. Theories of crime causation can be separated into trait theories and choice theories. Both types of theories make valid points about the causes of crime, yet they are have different implications for preventing the causes of crime. Thesis: Trait theories and choice theories both assume that humans are self-interested, but their conceptions of self-interest limit the applicability of each to certain types of crime. Trait theories appear more suited for explaining the causes of violent crime, whereas choice theories are more appropriate to property crimes or economic crimes.

The classical school of criminology which was influenced by Cesare de Baccaria. Baccaria is Considered the classical theory founder. This began were the time was during the 18th were crime and punishment were prevalent. This is the time using capital punishment was the decision in consequences of punishment.( The school of Criminology changed a couple things and has been very influential in the case of setting the punishment and determining the crime and how to understand reasoning to why people commit crime. The classical school is credited with eliminating torture and moving the criminal justice system into a new era. The classical school of criminology include various aspects. One of those aspects include rational choice. Which means a person has the right to use free will. The individual makes the choice and he later has to deal with the consequences. In the per-classical school era,there was such a thing called the Demonological theory.(Explanations of Criminology. Mrs. Glory Nirmala) Which is pretty much saying that devil made them do it. In the case of an offender pleading not guilty,they would have to face the judgment of god. It meant that he would decide innocence. The from god as the people from that era believed that stoning,throwing into fire and drowning to decipher innocence from guilt and to punish guilty. The pre classical school era was what seemed to be a trail and error, until Baccaria came with a different approach. The pre- classical may sometimes

Choice theory was born out of the perspective of crime causation which states that criminality is the result of conscious choice. This theory is also known as the rational choice theory. According to this theory, the choice whether or not to commit a criminal act is the result of a rational thought process that weighs the risks of paying the costs of committing a crime, against the benefits obtained. In other words, if the benefits--monetary or otherwise--outweigh the risks of sustaining the costs, such as fines, imprisonment or execution, then according to this theory the individual would be inclined to commit the crime, all other things being equal. In this calculus, the benefits are known. For example, “this diamond that I want to

Criminology earliest development traces back to the early 1700s, however did not fully bloom until the 1800s when criminal laws were being made and enforced (Altrichter, 2015). With this in mind, the first school to be developed through criminology was the classical school. The classical school was founded upon the thoughts and ideas of Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham (Altrichter, 2015). Cesare Beccaria implicated the idea that a crime is to be punished depending on its severity and rather not the criminal (Altrichter, 2015). Jeremy Bentham contributed to the classical school by stating that through a series of weighing the pleasure and pains of their results, this would increase or decrease the chances that a criminal would create a crime (Altrichter, 2015). The most notable idea that developed through the classical school is that criminals have a free will and can thinking

“Classical Criminology was developed in the eighteenth century in opposition to the use of extreme and arbitrary punishments. Classical Criminology advocated a rational approach that punishment ought to be imposed only to the extent necessary to ensure a deterrent.” (Rowe, 2012: 191)

What are the three major principles of the Classical School of Criminology? The major principles in the Classical School of Criminology are that humans are rational and that our behavior comes from free will, and our human behavior is derived from pain and pleasure. To deter criminal’s punishment is necessary, which may set an example for others. As well as crime prevention should be implemented with quick regulated punishment for violations of the law.

The foundation of classical criminology is its central belief that individual criminals engage in a process of rational decision making in choosing how to commit crime

The Classical school of criminology was established at a time around the Enlightenment era, when it was believed that crime was committed by individuals that think rationally and are responsible for their own actions meaning, individuals commit crime to satisfy their self-interest (Macionis and Plummer, 2012). Classicalism focuses on deterrence and punishment, Ceasare Beccaraia heavily influenced the criminal justice system, prior to him punishment was extremely stringent and severe. Jeremy Bentham supported Beccaraia and suggested more rational consequences to crime, the basis of his theory being punishment should be more painful than the pleasure of committing the crime, known as utilitarianism (March et al, 2009). The pleasure-pain principle was not evident in Rollins life, as an adolescent Rollins was stealing phone cards to sell on and progressed to stealing money, this therefore supports that Rollins was pleasure seeker and had minimal fear of punishment. Both Bentham and Beccaraia agreed criminals have free will and are able make their choice, however both philosophers fail to acknowledge social inequality and go on the assumption that there is a general consensus within society regarding norms and values (March et al, 2009). Rollins 2011 discusses how he was as young as 5years of age when he stabbed a peer in lesson, following this act he became withdrawn when an authority figure questioned him about his behaviours. This attack was unprovoked, and therefore