The Real Lincoln Essay

o Lincoln 's reputation as the great emancipator rests largely on his emancipation proclamation, an executive order which went into effect on January 1st, 1863. This order ostensibly freed all the slaves in territory currently rebelling against the United States, i.e. in areas where the US government had no authority to free slaves. This is rather like the United States announcing that, from here on out, North Korea would be ruled by Lady Gaga. Sure, it 's a great idea, but it 's not really your jurisdiction. In areas where the US did have the authority to free slaves--the border states and some of the areas of the Confederacy that had been effectively conquered and occupied by federal troops, those slaves were not freed. So Lincoln

The Emancipation Proclamation was a document that had freed states in the Confederate States. While some people had thought that the issuing of the Proclamation wsa the best idea Lincoln could have came up with in order to begin abolishing slavery. Meanwhile some people thought that the idea was completely terrible and unworthy of attention. As the war progressed further, Lincoln quickly realized that slavery was a noteworthy aspect of the war effort from the Confederacy, and his main goal quickly became to use the slaves to fight alongside the Union. His belief at the time was that any source or thing that could even potentially help the Union was a plan that needed to be put into action as soon as possible. Not to mention, the North would

He knew after the war the union would need to be reconstructed and that was his fundamental core interest. At, to begin with, Lincoln restricted subjugation yet did not think about liberating the slaves unless he thought it would profit the union. A little know truth is that Lincoln really trusted that blacks and whites couldn't live respectively and attempted to discover methods for sending them

“The Real Lincoln written by Thomas J. Dilorenzo published in 2002 gives us details into the Lincoln presidency It shows how Lincoln wanted a more central government he was not a man for all people but for the north. It shows that Lincoln was not the reason for the split in the country but a sense of pride was to blame. He did not support equal rights in slave and white americans. He was for the “ American system” and the expansion of America. Lorenzo is a member of the faculty at Loyola University of Maryland where he teaches economics. Lorenzo also wrote several other books: Lincoln Unmasked, How Capitalism Saved America, Hamilton’s Curse, and Inflating War. He is not the biggest fan of Lincoln in The Real Lincoln; in this book he tends

Lincoln was a self-taught lawyer and give him the advantage of being able to pick up information quickly and retain it (Lincoln as commander, 2009). Once Lincoln took on the role as the Commander in Chief, he was determined to have a strong army and emancipating the slaves would assist him in accomplishing that goal. Initially, when General John Fremont issued military orders freeing the slaves, Lincoln was opposed to because he felt freeing the slaves would agitate the Southern states (Lincoln as commander, 2009). In addition, Lincoln wanted to stay in alliance with the Unionist and anti-abolitionist for war purposes so he wanted to keep his plans for emancipation under wraps. Lincoln was a man that always saw slavery as inhumane but because he took the oath to follow the constitution, which protected property and slave were considered property, Lincoln felt as though he had to abide by it, as those before him (Nagler, 2009). When tension between the North and South began to thicken, Lincoln decided the emancipation was mandatory to win the war against the South. “We must free the slaves or be ourselves subdued” (Lincoln as commander, 2009). Though Lincoln has always been against slavery, to some he did not act on freeing the slaves until he knew it would benefit, and forming a strong Army was what he

In it, as detailed in document five of our appendix, Lincoln declared that all slaves were free. To give this teeth, he declared that he was using his powers as Commander in Chief of the US Armed Forces to instruct the Army and Navy to make sure that they recognized the freedom of these freed slaves Lincoln apparently thought he had Devine guidance to do this, as historians have noted and as a picture from artist David Gilmour Blyhte from the National Archives shows Lincoln with one hand on the Bible and one on the US Constitution as he writes the Emancipation Proclamation. People in the Southern States thought Lincoln was, however, the devil. They thought that, once freed, slaves would rise up against their former masters, They were both angry and scared. They remembered John Brown’s rebellion in 1859, where slaves had, indeed, attacked slaveholders. Southerners thought the same thing would happen again in mass numbers. Lincoln’s purpose in doing this was to reinforce the northern mandate to fight against the south, to satisfy members of his own political party who were strongly anti-slavery, and to punish the south. He was, absolutely, biased in favor of the northern point of view. An important point to make here is that, without Lincoln and the Republicans having such

On March 4, 1861, Abraham Lincoln was elected as the 16th President of the United States. Southern politicians assumed that Lincoln would not take steps to abolish slavery immediately, they were correct, he didn’t, but they pondered on whether he would change his mind in the years to come. It was a well-known fact that President Lincoln did not agree with slavery, and the southern states felt threatened by this. While some southern states opted to secede from the Union, Lincoln, who was against with the secession from the Union, decided not to take

He initially did not admit to wanting to abolish or change rules on slavery. In Abraham's first inaugural speech he states, "I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so." He reassures the South that he doesn't believe he has the right to touch slavery. Whether this was how he truly felt about slavery at the time or not, he felt it was right to tell the South he would not take slavery away from them. Almost two years later in 1862 President Lincoln publicly shares his true feelings about slavery. In a letter to Horace Greeley he finished with, "I have here stated my purpose according to my view of official duty, and I intend no modification of my oft-ex-pressed personal wish that all men everywhere could be free." Abraham now feels comfortable sharing his real view on slavery, and wishes everyone, everywhere could be free from oppression and slavery. In the beginning Lincoln claimed he had no desire to touch the institution of slavery, but later we find out he believes slavery is immoral and wish it didn't

President Abraham Lincoln, sometimes called “The Great Emancipator”, is best remembered today for his Emancipation Proclamation. This proclamation, issued in September 1862 and enacted at the start of 1863, freed all slaves in rebelling states in the Confederacy and had a dramatic impact on the outcome of the Civil War. However, even though Lincoln was morally against the concept of slavery, he had previously stated that he had no intention of abolishing it. Why did he explicitly violate his own word? Multiple factors played a part in Lincoln’s decision to emancipate the slaves. Firstly, as the conflict progressed from a minor rebellion to a full-blown civil war, Lincoln felt that the Emancipation Proclamation would strengthen the Union’s

In Thomas DiLorenzo’s controversial book, The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War, a new light is shed upon the historic President Lincoln. It challenges ideas and beliefs that students are taught in grade school, and incorporates a new way of thinking. Above all, this book provides insight into the real life of Lincoln, and remains controversial due to its impeding and harsh criticisms.

The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War is written by Thomas J. DiLorenzo. He is the professor of economics at Loyola University Maryland and a member of the senior faculty of the Mises Institute. He has received the George F. Koether Free Market Writing Award and his works have been published in the Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics. He has written another book titled Hamilton 's Curse: How Jefferson’s Archenemy Betrayed the American Revolution — and What It Means for Americans Today. As Dilorenzo states in the first chapter of The Real Lincoln, his purpose of writing it was to help his readers to come to realize that Abraham Lincoln was not a “Great Emancipator” as many people know him to be. DiLorenzo says that “[Lincoln] was almost single-mindedly devoted to an economic agenda that Henry Clay labeled “the American System” (2).

Republicans made all three planks: tariff, national bank, and “internal improvements” an integral part of national economic life by 1863 with half the nation in rebellion. The rest of Lincoln's brilliance came with his powerful ways of persuasion, which ultimately backed up by the entire Union army. Lincoln's 1863 Emancipation Proclamation to free the slaves, was admitted by he himself to be little more than a ploy designed to stop European aid to the South with radical abolitionists. DiLorenzo also looks closely at Lincoln's dictatorial political and military policies during war time, and considers what might have happened to southern slaves over time if the Civil War and subsequent bitterness of the “Reconstruction” period had never happened.

He told them that he had said this many times before. Lincoln stated “I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it already exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so.”(Abraham Lincoln: First Inaugural Address.WWW.Bartleby.com) He also told them that he did not care about getting rid of the Fugitive Slave Act. This was a law that said that if a slave escaped to a free state, that did not mean that he was free and he could get sent back to where he escaped from. Lincoln said “No person held to service or labor in one state under the laws therefore, escaping into another, shall, in consequence of any law or regulation therein, be discharged from such service or labor...”(Abraham Lincoln: First Inaugural Address. WWW.bartleby.com) He was basically telling the south not to worry about him being president. He assured them he would not go back on his

According to scholarly article, “ Why Men Fought in the Civil War,” written by James McPherson, it states, “that in the first three ages of the conflict only about thirty percent troops who wrote home assumed that the obliteration of slavery was inseparably associated to the objective of preserving the Union” (McPherson, 1997). Abraham Lincoln constantly thought slavery was one-sided. He alleged that if slavery is not unethical, nothing is unethical. This declaration is a case of transactional management at its best. In this reaction he makes it obvious that he will liberate the slaves only if it is beneficial to saving the merger. By joining the contentious act of release the slaves with the undeniable act of saving the union, Lincoln was organizing the nation in the event liberation became necessary. He led everyone to believe he hadn’t made up his mind yet, but he intended to do what he thought best for the purpose of saving the

President Abraham Lincoln attempted to frame the Emancipation Proclamation as way to preserve the Union and fend off state secession versus the abolition of slavery. Although not abolitionist, Lincoln’s attitudes toward slavery, race, and Southerners shaped his public positions. He pictured slavery as a menace to white America and an immediate threat to the interests of white men. He depicted slavery as invading not only the territories but the free states as well (Escott, 2014).